Do the Wrong Thing Part Three: Spike Lee–Head Nigga in Charge

It was Rachel Jeantel, the prosecution’s star witness against George Zimmerman, who has given me, even as a plain dumb white guy, complete permission to use the terminology, “Nigga.” She asserts it has absolutely no racial or
negative connotations whatsoever. And Ms Jeantel has recently graduated from high school. So obviously she’s qualified to represent the best and brightest of the “black community” on the matter.

Jeantel’s academic progression mind you, took what her bt efactors themselves admit was a “village.” It was more like an entire industry dedicated to making good on the mid-trial boasts of her race-based defenders of honor. This again, due to the response of the jury and the public, and much of the “black community” itself, to her moronic demeanor and belligerent performance in the Zimmerman trial. It became a matter of racial pride to “prove” that she wasn’t just a “Dumb Nigga.” And fine, I’ll take 1111mages_thumb1nothing away from her or the multi-incorporated nation-state of Afro-Americanica that spent billions of dollars and thousands of man-hours (person hours) to get her through the 12th grade. (She and Ricky from Trailer Park Boys can be proud—though Ricky completed his grade 12 in jail on his own…) Praise the Lord. The combined efforts of America’s entire “black community” got Rachel Jeantel through high school. That’s a good thing.

OK, let’s be totally honest now: the boast made by Rachel Jeantel’s black social-working mafia was to actually guarantee a full college scholarship. But then, nobody wants to be accused of beating up on the “retarded” kid. (Even though that’s her terminology.) By the same token, it’s incomprehensible to me that that the “black2a0c30e0634163bbfccf5de28e7e98cdc8e8 community” or any subset of it would take upon itself the likes of a Rachel Jeantel to rub in my ruddy white face as the vanguard of the new Black America. Rachel Jeantel is not an ensign signaling the brilliance of African-American potential to all nations. No. Let’s be fair. Rachel Jeantel is not the brightest bulb in the magnificent, sparkling bright theatre marquee of black America. America–nay, the world, is filled with brilliant minds, bodies, talents, wisdom and artistry possessed by fellow human beings of black, African descent. Rachel Jeantel just isn’t one of them.

How is it then, that so much of the “black community” so obviously feels that admitting that 9ed950ac2b8a7cc0fa8e430b08adf87199fb[1]Rachel Jeantel is an idiot and a bad witness would be confessing the inferiority of the entire “black community?” That’s easy. It’s because, somewhere in the mid-1980’s, the children of the original Civil Rights activists, having benefitted from all the Constitutional, legal, and governmentally-enforced “progress” fought for by their parents, developed as a result, a total sense of “entitlement,” based upon the sentiment, “you exploited my people for four-hundred years, now it’s payback time…” All the educational curriculum changes, the “black history” or “black studies” texts that evolved, much of which was intended to establish parity and equality, only reinforced this sense of entitlement, and taught subsequent generations of black youth why they should hate white people and expect special treatment.

http://llenrad.com/its-a-nigga-thang-maybe-you-would-understand/

While this generation of young black Americans hasn’t personally suffered any significant legal or Constitutional, much less physical persecution, they “read about it.” Or more accurately, had it read to them. Or they saw it in a movie by geniuses like Spike Lee. They were told in highly dramatized and overly-romanticized intonations about all the great black people who ever lived and how the world would be living in caves without them. (Yes, literally.) download_thumb1They are still taught however, that second-class citizenship and institutionalized “racism” in America is a permanent fixture, not a thing of the past. They have been told it all just went underground, and the American dream is still just for white people. Oddly enough they’re still hearing that from billionaires like Oprah Winfrey, and multi-millionaire cinema directors like Spike Lee, while enjoying a two-term, soundly re-elected black president of the United States.

http://humor.gunaxin.com/al-sharpton-idiot-racist/69264

In the “Great Society,” there developed a myth in the “black community,” a doctrine enforced by a sort of “Stockholm Syndrome” of ghettoi-see-you-learned-ebonics-my-nigga_t fellowship, that there’s nothing at all wrong with being a “Dumb Nigga.” Nigga-ness was canonized. Nigga-talk became “Ebonics,” and the “thug life” became “black male culture,” or a “fashion statement.”

http://llenrad.com/its-a-nigga-thang-maybe-you-would-understand/

Except for backwater, redneck rural pockets and a few ignorant urban trailerparks, does the “black community” really think there is a whole nation of white dudes out there who watch Jesse breaking-bad-jesse_thumbPinkman in Breaking Bad and says to itself, he’s just disadvantaged? He’s misunderstood. What a brilliant young man! He just needs a chance. And then there’s Badger and Skinny Pete. A couple of potential Rhodes Scholars? Is that what the average white Americanimages-8_thumb5 would think? Do these obvious dolts only need a “village” to get them on the road to enlightenment and wisdom? Or, to make a finer point of it, moving down the dumbass evolutionary chain, we come to Todd. A-moral, quasi-autistic, sociopathic white-supremist, yeah, but a quick study with lots of potential? Does he just need to be pointed in the right direction? Or do we, the common, white, core-demographic of the show write him off as an ignorant hick without a lick of common sense, 36120_thumb1and a danger to himself and others? Is “white America” mourning the loss of his whole clan of moronic, Aryan master-goofs?

Not really. No.

Spike Lee, actually is one of “black America’s” best and brightest (so I’m told)  He was also one of the first major cling-ons to grasp the chance to get his irrelevant face back into the media after the Trayvon Martin shooting, and he likewise immediately clinged-on to the sad ending of Michael Brown. You wouldn’t think so to listen to him talk, but Spike Lee had a humble, but pretty idyllic childhood and followed a pretty smooth career path to major success.

Shelton “Spike” Lee is an African American filmmaker who adamantly believes that “racism is woven into the very fabric of America.”
Lee was born in Atlanta, Georgia on March 20, 1957. Soon thereafter his family moved to Brooklyn, New York, where Lee was raised. His fatherspikelee060814_2_198 (1) was a jazz musician, his mother a teacher. After graduating from Morehouse College in 1979 with a BA in mass communication, Lee attended the graduate film program at New York University’s Tisch School of Arts. There he began producing short, independent films and earned a Master of Fine Arts in film & television.

Lee is immensely wealthy, with a net worth of approximately $40 million. In 1998 he and his wife, Tonya Lewis Lee, purchased a three-story, five-bedroom, 8,292-square-foot New York City townhouse for $16.6 million. The dwelling has original-detail fireplaces, an interior courtyard, a library, an elevator, and staff quarters. In 2013 Lee put his home on the market, with an asking price of $32 million.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1990

Spike’s mother taught African-American literature at an all-white school. Spike resented her for that. Lee is also still harboring father issues, related to all the stereotypes you might expect from having a black jazz musician for a father. These tensions were exacerbated after his mother died and his father remarried a white Jewish woman.

http://monmouthu12.blogspot.com/p/freudian-analysis-of-spike-lee.html

Lee was asked about this topic in a 1991 interview with Playboy magazine 181195960and said: “I never see black men with fine white women. They be ugly. Mugly, dogs. And you always see white men with good-looking black women.” When the interviewer then made reference to a prior statement where Lee had vowed never to become romantically involved with white women, the filmmaker replied: “I don’t need the trouble. Like I don’t go for that, don’t like that sh*t. I just don’t find white women attractive, that’s all. And it’s way too many fine black women out there.”

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1990

Spike Lee’s own wife, Tonya Lewis, was an exercise in marrying “up.” She comes from a circle of New York elite black families that go back generations in their money and influence. And to be honest, for all Spike’s protestations, she’s lighter skinned than George Zimmerman. But not quite as light I suppose as his step mother.

Bill Lee has said their problems started with his son’s intolerance of his interracial second marriage. The family feud began in 1976, when Spike Lee’s mother Jacquelyn died of cancer and Susan Kaplan moved in with 01LEE-nyregion-articleLargeBill. Spike has been quoted as saying, “my mother wasn’t even cold in her grave.”

Bad feelings intensified with Jungle Fever, Spike Lee’s film on White-Black romantic relationships.[6] “That’s directly talking about me and my wife in a negative way,” said Bill Lee, who has a son, Arnold Tone Kaplan Lee, by his present wife.[6] Mrs. Lee has said, “I’ve never been a Spike Lee fan.”[6] In 1992, when Bill Lee asked his son for a few thousand dollars to cover household expenses, Spike turned him down “and his attitude was very insulting,” said Bill Lee in 1994.[6]

Asked if he would give his side of the story, Spike Lee stated, “Why should I dignify comments my father said, or play it out in a public forum?”[6]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Lee_(musician)

But of course, Spike Lee had just given his side of the story in a very public venue when he made Jungle Fever.

In spite of most of Lee’s film work being awkward, b3a65a6eb88007329d854b664ca6455b_xla[1]cheesy, clumsy and smothered in a thick bag of “blackness” deliberately designed to pander to the “Negro” while490x490xspike-lee-trayvon-ebony.jpg alienating the “White-o,” Spike Lee emerged as the only serious “black” film maker of the 1980’s generation. He made his money essentially being the hip-hop artist of feature films. He’s most famous for Do the Right Thing, which is something of a primer on how to be a faithful and true “Dumb Nigga.” His career benefitted from cultural timing heavily, like the popular rise of “blackness” and “gangsta rap” in the general American social and artistic communities. His actual writing and overall filmmaking skills have been, and remain, somewhat rudimentary. His ability to focus and deliver his “vision” in his work is chiefly hindered by the fact that clearly, the overall message he wants to convey to the world is “F**k You Whitey.” The sentiment leaks through everything he does, so most of his work tends to smell like rotting cheese here and there.

Spike Lee’s transparent Oscar bid Miracle at St. Anna isn’t good, but its criclint-eastwood3_thumb1tical drubbing reveals the cultural underestimation of a great director.

Every once in a while Spike Lee likes to say “fuck you,” or, as one of his characters says in his latest movie: “Progress? Nigga please.” Do the Right Thing was something of a cuss-out, as was Bamboozled and School Daze. One could argue When the Levees Broke is too, but I’d argue it’s a poetic cry for justice, an opera of sorts.

This time Lee almost literally said fuck you to Clint Eastwood, one of cinema’s reigning Great Directors, bashing his “white” Flags of Our Fathers and seemingly dismissing his Oscar-l080930_miracle_spike_thumb1nominated Letters from Iwo Jima. Why go after Clint? Maybe Lee wanted buzz for his new movie, Miracle at St. Anna. Or maybe he simply tired of Eastwood and Scorsese winning Oscars while his masterpiece Do the Right Thing sits at #96 of AFI’s Top 100 movies—just added last year, almost a decade after the list’s inception. I think he’d prefer to be off the list entirely. Surely Lee has a right to be a sore winner. He’s by far the most well-known and critically respected black director living today; there aren’t many to begin with, and this is the thanks he gets?

http://splicetoday.com/moving-pictures/the-angry-black-man

Spike Lee has long been openly critical of mixed race couples, and has frequently taken to pissing and moaning about other “race” films and their directors, notably Quentin Tarantino and his Django Unchained, which he refused to see. Samuel L Jackson, who was featured in the film, answers Lee in a playboy interview:

Spike saying “I’m not going to see Django because it’s an insult to my ancestors”? It’s fine if you think that, but then you have nothing else to say about the movie, period, because you don’t know if Quentin insulted yourreg_634.ab.samuel.041112_thumb1 ancestors or not. On the other hand, Louis Farrakhan, who these blackest of black people say speaks the truth and expresses the vitriol of the angry black man, can look at the movie and go, “Goddamn, that’s a great fucking movie. Quentin Tarantino told the truth.” Dick Gregory’s seen the movie 12 fucking times. I respect what they have to say more than anybody else, because they’ve been through it. They walked the walk with Dr. King. Some of the bullshit criticisms about Django come from people who don’t understand the genre and who didn’t live through that era. They think they need to wave a flag of blackness that they don’t necessarily have the credentials to wave.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2013/09/samuel_l_jackson_on_spike_lee_and_quentin_tarantino.html

Jamie Foxx, who starred in Django Unchained had a word for Spike as well:reg_634.django3.mh.052912_thumb2

“The question for me is: where’s Spike Lee coming from?” Foxx asked. “He didn’t like Whoopi Goldberg, he doesn’t like Tyler Perry, he doesn’t like anybody, I think he’s sort of run his course.”

http://www.thewrap.com/movies/article/jamie-foxx-calls-spike-lee-irresponsible-criticizing-quentin-tarantino-73731/

Where Spike Lee is coming from was plainly detailed in a great scene played by Denzel Washington in X.

Spike Lee’s alter ego

 

Simply put, Spike Lee imagines himself to be the dues-paid, ascended cinematic spokesman for all black people everywhere. He may not have Oscars on his shelf, he may be banging his head against the “white ceiling” of the Academy, his career and earning potential may be hampered by the racism of the box-office, but he’s damned-well notimages (87) going to be upstaged in the portrayal of “black history” by some pasty white Italian-American boy from Tennessee who’s only filmmaking credential is he worked in a video rental shop. He’s damned well not going to have to hustle for dimes on the rough streets of South Central to get a film together, while Tyler Perry’s “coonery and buffoonery” rolls in the big bucks and Hollywood producers and dirstributors beg for more.

Spike Lee may have had street cred in youth. Obviously he wants to hang onto that more than anything in the world. But that was a long time ago. That was a lifetime ago. Mostly what he is now is called a, “bougie black.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X0x1Pra3tQ

While Clint Eastwood might be conditionally faulted for not randomly throwing a token black face in either part of his WWII filmic duo, Flags of our Fathers, and Letters from Iwo Jima, Eastwood is quite right when he responds to Spike Lee’s complaints, to point out that the former focuses on the small group that raises the flag in the famous photo and film sequence of that war, none of whom were black. At the time, black servicemen fought in segregated units so nobody in their vicinity would likely be “colored” either. The latter film is all from the Japanese perspective. There are obviously no “colored” Japanese troops. Lee argues that some black servicemen actually did land on Iwo Jima. But that’s not the point. The point is, what were they doing and where were they doing it?

 

Lee’s argument is this:

“Clint Eastwood made two films about Iwo Jima that ran for more than four hours total, and there was not one Negro actor on the screen,” Lee said at the Cannes Film Festival. “In his version of Iwo Jima, Negro soldiers did not exist.” Eastwood’s counter: “Has he ever studied history? [African-American soldiers] didn’t raise the flag,” he {Eastwood} said. “If I go ahead and put an African-American actor in there, they’d say, “This guy’s lost hisdownload (34) mind.'” Eastwood also told Lee to “shut his face,” prompting Lee to amplify the racism charge: “[Eastwood] is not my father and we’re not on a plantation, either,” he fumed. “I’m not making this up. I know history.”

History, as it turns out, is on both their sides. Lee is correct that African-Americans played an instrumental role in World War II, in which more than 1 million black servicemen helped defeat the Axis Powers. Those efforts include significant contributions to the fight for Iwo Jima. An estimated 700 to 900 African-American soldiers participated in the epic island battle, many of whom were Marines trained in segregated boot camps at Montford Point, within Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.

Those soldiers were restricted from front-line combat duty, but they played integral noncombat roles….

Eastwood’s portrayal of the specific battle is, if narrow, also essentially accurate. Flags Of Our Fathers zeroes in on the soldiers who hoisted the clinteastwood2U.S. flag atop Mount Suribachi, and this task, memorialized in a famous staged photograph, was accomplished by five white servicemen and a sixth, Ira Hayes, of Pima Indian descent. (His other entry in the Iwo Jima category, Letters from Iwo Jima, is told largely from the perspective of Japanese soldiers.)

Eastwood is also correct that black soldiers represented a small fraction of the total force deployed on the island. That argument doesn’t placate Yvonne Latty, a New York University professor and author of a book about African-American veterans. Black soldiers “had the most dangerous job,” she says. “If you were going to show the soldiers’ landing, you’d need to show [African-Americans] on the beach.” In Flags of Our Fathers, which shows the landing in significant detail, African-Americans appear only in fleeting cutaway shots and in a photograph during the film’s closing credits.

http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1812972,00.html

In Spike Lee’s world of black self-importance, the main thing is to throw positive black role models into the faces of black audiences, whom he presumes are just dying to spend their ticket money to be educated. I suppose that’s why he’s known as the greatest black USMC-C-Iwo-p17bdirector in the world, and not the greatest director in the world.

Now, there’s nothing stopping some rich black investor from giving Spike Lee a ship-ton of money to make an Iwo Jima movie about Thomas McPhatter, Lee’s primary source for the deep inside story of the black American experience of single-handedly taking that Island from the Japanese.

Mr McPhatter, who went on to serve in Vietnam and rose to the rank of lieutenant commander in the US navy, even had a part in the raising of the flag. “The man who put the first flag up on Iwo aaaaaJima got a piece of pipe from me to put the flag up on,” he says. That, too, is absent from the film.

“Of all the movies that have been made of Iwo Jima, you never see a black face,” said Mr McPhatter. “This is the last straw. I feel like I’ve been denied, I’ve been insulted, I’ve been mistreated. But what can you do? We still have a strong underlying force in my country of rabid racism.”

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/oct/20/usa.film

With all due respect for Mr McPhatter, the cinematic story of the black ammunition and support images (84)units at Iwo Jima would consist of two hours of “colored” Marines getting blown up and shot all to hell trying to haul stuff onto the beach, highlighted at the end, by some white guy wandering down to ask Thomas McPhatter if he’s got a pipe or a pole or something handy to put a flag on. As the flag is raised moments later, all the black Marines wold look up the hill to see Old Glory rise on Mount Suribatchi.

“That’s my pipe!” McPhatter would shout. (All the Negroes cheer.)

Roll End Credits.

http://www.montfordpointmarines.com/Rev%20McPhatter.pdf

http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/utsandiego/obituary.aspx?n=thomas-h-mcphatter&pid=126998223

Spike Lee did of course, counter efforts from grumpy old war-film directors like Clint Eastwood with a would-be WWII epic of his own: Miracle at St Anna. It did a piddling boxoffice, got very mixed reviews, mostly bad, and in general approximated what you’d end up with if yourimages (92) main goal was to show black soldiers in combat roles in WWII, and all other facets of the film, like a plot, dialogue, entertainment value, or an intrinsic, universal reason for anyone having any interest in the story, were secondary.

Miracle at St. Anna premiered at the 2008 Toronto International Film Festival before it was released on September 26, 2008. It was met with mostly negative reviews from critics and drew controversy in Italy over its historical accuracy. During its theatrical run, Miracle at St. Anna was a box office disappointment, grossing only $9.2 million worldwide.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_at_St._Anna

There was one film you may recall, that did put black servicemen in exciting combat roles, was fairly historically accurate, and put a lot of positive black faces on the screen. That would be 220px-African-americans-wwii-058Red Tails. It was a major work of love for George Lucas, who ended up putting a bunch of his own money into it to get it made. Much preemptive race-baiting was tendered by old George as it was due for release in 2012. He claimed it had been rejected by all of Hollywood’s distributors and production companies because they didn’t know how to market it without any white people in the film. But Lucas hung in there, elicited the benefits of the new social media circles of hype as the film became a “progressive” and “black” social cause, and eventually the film found a decent market and a small amount of critical success. However, though it got an overall positive recommendation, this Rotten Tomatoes review explains:

Critics Consensus: Despite a worthy fact-based story and obvious good intentions, Red Tails suffers from one-dimensional characters, corny dialogue, and heaps of clichés.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/red-tails/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/10/george-lucas-hollywood-download (36)di_n_1197227.html

Red Tails received a nomination at the 2012 Teen Choice Awards for “Choice Action Movie“,[50][N 6] and was also nominated at the 2012 BET Awards for “Best Movie”.[51]

Later, in February 2013, Red Tails won the NAACP Image Award in the categories of “Outstanding Motion Picture” and “Outstanding Independent Motion Picture” at the 44th NAACP Image Awards.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Tails

But not all students and defenders of black history were so happy with it:

Adolph Reed, professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania, said the film “trivializes segregation in the military by reducing it to a matter of bad or outmoded attitudes. The ironic effect is significant understatement of both the obstacles the Tuskegee airmen<sic> faced and their actual accomplishments by rendering them as backdrop for a blackface, slapped-together remake of Top Gun.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Tails

Don’t be silly. It was a blackface, slapped-together remake of Star Wars, not Top Gun.

A lot of black voices on blogs and black media cry out for Spike Lee to keep setting tspike-lee-black-power-700x400hese sorts of “white” entertainment industry “offenders” straight, to answer back and correct the historical record. Show us the struggle of emerging black lesbians in the urban northeast they cry—not this Hollywood Red Tail nonsense! (Yes, I actually read that here: ) And while Lee whines constantly about other major directors not including black faces in big Hollywood productions, it’s clear that when black casts are included, even when the whole cast is black, or major, featured stars are black, it’s just never good enough for Spike Lee.download (38)

The Magical Negro is a supporting stock character in American cinema who is portrayed as coming to the aid of a film’s white protagonists.[1] These characters, who often possess special insight or mystical powers, have been a long tradition in American fiction.[2]

john-coffeySpike Lee, while discussing films with students at Washington State University and at Yale University, said he was dismayed at Hollywood‘s decision to continue using the premise; he noted that the films The Green Mile and The Legend of Bagger Vance used the “super-duper magical Negro”.[3][4][5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_Negro

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Magical_Negro_occurrences_in_fiction

http://www.yale.edu/opa/arc-ybc/v29.n21/story3.html

Cuba Gooding Jr was something of the Jackie Robinson of WWI movies. He was on deck at MV5BMTIzMzk4NjQ2Ml5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwNzc3ODI4._V1_SY317_CR3,0,214,317_AL_Pearl Harbor, a major blockbuster. He played the first black Navy diver in Men of Honor. He was in Tuskeegee Airmen. When he finally won an Oscar, Spike Lee essentially called him an Uncle Tom for thanking Jesus and doing a back flip onstage at the ceremony. Spike also took a shot at Ving Rhames for giving his Golden Globe award to Jack Lemon as a token of his respect.

Lee, whose latest film, Bamboozled, satirizes the media’s depiction of blacks, says that there’s no longer any excusedownload (35) for African-Americans to degrade themselves on national television. “My people have to wake up and realize what’s going on and our responsibility in it,” he says. “I mean, back in the day we didn’t have a choice. Hattie McDaniel and Bill “Bojangles” Robinson didn’t have a choice. Nowadays we don’t have to do this stuff. So anything you do is on you.” A UPN rep had “no comment” on Lee’s remarks.

…In the Newsweek article, on sale this week, Lee also slams Ving Rhames and images (85)Cuba Gooding Jr. for the way they accepted awards. (Rhames gave his Golden Globe to Jack Lemmon and Gooding did a back flip after winning his Oscar).

“When you give an award to a man you never met in your life, what do you expect? That sent chills down my spine, to see him do that to an award he earned,” groans Lee. “The same with Cuba spinning on his head. What was that? But you notice neither has stopped working since. That kind of entertainment will keep you working.”

http://www.tvguide.com/news/spike-lee-friend-40450.aspx

Spike Lee doesn’t live in the ‘hood. He’s picked for himself an extremely light-skinned wife hooked into an imageselite social circle of longtime-affluent black New York socialite families. He’s produced a family of light-skinned, spoiled-rich children. He lives in an exclusive compound with a central courtyard and servantsdownload quarters, in the most expensive part of Manhattan. He lectures other black artists nonstop about their portrayal of black people in racist stereotypes, and yet he’s eager to run down to places like Ferguson Missouri, play the homey, hang out in the street with black thugs losing their drawers, underpants hanging in the breeze, drinking malt liquor and Purple images (1)Drank, cheering on their rioting and looting as if that’s model “black” behavior. His own work is filled with racism, vulgarity, cartoon-Negroes and all-‘round bad black role models. Spike can’t even decide for himself which way he wants it: “Dumb Nigga,” or wealthy, educated, refined socialite and entrepreneur. He thinks if he loses all of the “Dumb Nigga” in himself it would be turning “white,” so he clings desperately to that angry, damaged little black boy inside. He wants his lifetime courtside seat at the ballgame, but he wants to pretend he’s still humping pizza’s around for Sal’s Famous Pizzeria to make ends meet at the same time. He enters forums of higher education and delivers profanity-based lectures against the “white” encroachment on “black culture” featuring the NBA’s favorite epithet every other word and his student minious in the halls of learning applaud his crude diatribes as if it was a combination of poetry and scripture. That’s being “authentically” black. That’s the image Spike Lee imagines to be the standard of black excellence.

Maybe Cuba Gooding Jr just loves Jesus and likes spinning on his head. Maybe Ving Rhames actually admires Jack Lemmon and thinks the old master of the craft should have a trophy of some sort before he kicks off. Maybe Spike Lee just refuses to accept the notion that black people might actually like images (96)the burlesque “blackness” of Tyler Perry’s comedy and when Perry performs it, it’s because he chooses to perform it, and when his very large audience of fans watch it, they’re choosing to support it. Or perhaps it simply blows Lee’s mind that both black and white audiences find something universally enjoyable about Perry’s work, Gooding’s work, Rhames work, Tarantino’s work, and creative product of all those others he chooses to pick apart, whereas, in his own work, he’s playing to what he himself terms a “niche” audience. Maybe the “black community” and black entertainers he chastises are very well-aware they have a choice, and that choice simply isn’t Spike Lee. Whatever his motivation, it appears that Spike has essentially appointed himself to the permanent office of divine arbiter of all people, places and things related to being black and entertaining.

At a Harvard panel on race on Monday, Spike Lee criticized Will Smith for agreeing to play a mystical caddy to Matt Damon’s golden boy in The Legend of Bagger Vance.

According to the New York Post, Lee referred to the movie as “Driving Mr. Damon” for painting such a pretty picture of racial relations in the images (93)Depression-era South.

In real life, black men were being “castrated and lynched left and right,” the Boston Globe quotes Lee as saying. “With all that going on, why are you [expletive] trying to teach Matt Damon a golf swing?”

Could it be that Lee is still miffed that Smith chose to back Michael Mann, instead of Lee, as the director for Ali?

Smith told Mr. Showbiz in a recent interview that he couldn’t initially get past the “Yes, sirs” his character had to say in the script, but finally decided that the role and the story were intriguing enough for him to commit. The Robert Redford movie has so far seen so-so reviews and middling box-images (94)office business.

Lee made similar criticisms earlier of The Patriot, which he accused of “whitewashing … history,” saying that the Revolutionary War flick “dodged around, skirted about, or completely ignored slavery.”

Those who have met with Lee’s wrath before include Quentin Tarantino (for liberal use of the word “nigger” in Pulp Fiction) and “Show me the money” Oscar winner Cuba Gooding Jr. (who is parodied in Lee’s film Bamboozled).

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=113438

And of course, we have this observation in rebuttal from one of Spike Lee’s frequent targets:

I spoke to Oscar-winner Cuba Gooding, Jr. about his role in “Lee Daniels’ The Butler” as Carter, a colleague and friend of Cecil, the character played by Forest Whitaker.images (95)

The whole idea behind it and reason I was so attracted to this screenplay was that it is an expose of the times all the way back from slavery to the inauguration of Barack Obama, and specifically the turmoil of the era after JFK and Martin Luther King were assassinated.  There were different thoughts about how best to respond to racism.  One was the view of Martin Luther King, Jr. mindset download (40)that we should be seen as accessible and approachable and lead by example, and the other more aggressive frame of mind, the “by any means necessary” views of the Black Panthers and Malcolm X.  What’s beautifully expressed in this movie is how it doesn’t alienate people but shows these two approaches in a way that’s accessible and open and un-opinionated.  That’s what makes Lee Daniels such a brilliant director.  I always say to him, “If Spike Lee did this movie, no one would see it.  He would have had his opinions and his personal beliefs encroaching on it.

http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/moviemom/2013/08/interview-cuba-gooding-jr-of-lee-daniels-the-butler.html#ixzz3HDCkAJFZ

Lee’s best film in my opinion however, would be X, the story of Malcolm X. To be fair it was a well told, shot, edited and conceived story with a couple of notable exceptions:

First, Lee couldn’t resist over and over and over again the awkward, film-school contrivance of foreshadowing Malcolm’s assassination by the constant intrusion of exploding, echoing, thundering flashbulbs from the cameras of reporters. Bang. Bang. Pop. Pop.  Boom. All through the damned movie. Yeah yeah, we know he’s going to get shot Spike… And then, just when you were ready to forgive the flashbulbs, instead of ending the movie like a normal human being spike-lee-hobbit_thumb2would, at the end—he abruptly digresses into a flash-ahead, flash-nowhere, confuso-flash to a bunch of kids in elementary school standing at their desks saying, “I am Malcolm X… I am Malcolm X… I am Malcolm X.” Well, no you aren’t. And Spike Lee for one, didn’t apparently learn a damned thing from his so-called research of El Haj Malik El Shabazz.

For one thing, Malcolm X didn’t die “Malcolm X.” So not even Malcolm X was “Malcolm X” by the time he’d completed his earthly mission. It was as if Spike thought the “Dumb Niggas” out in the theatre weren’t going to get the point so he had to throw in an Obama-style community organization meeting at the end to explain it to Rachel Jeantel and her friends. He wanted the local hoodies to be coming out of the theatre with a memorable catch phrase. I’m sure that’s a great marketing gimmick that in its day played well in the “hood.” Today’s youth however, are starting to consider it a joke:

I am definitely not Malcolm X

 

That said, still, every good Leftist, neo-hippy, guilted-out white liberal will be right there with Spike on the protest-era bandwagon, download-6_thumb1back in a nostalgic euphoria full of chanting and sloganing and picket signs with clever snippets of sophomoric wisdom hastily scribbled on them in Sharpie. Hence, today we have a veritable renaissance of little Trayvon marchers dressed in hoodies waving Skittles and iced tea, and riot-monkeys in Fergusson taunting the local trayving200_thumb1cops with their hands up, begging them not to shoot. Civil disobedience. Street theatre. It’s the Left’s gift to American culture, a holdover from the great riots and protests of the 1960’s. It’s passive-aggressive genius of course, designed to get the cops to shoot you. The object is a riot. The object is to get photographic evidence of police brutality, even if you have to spend all night and burn down your own neighborhood to provoke it.

The sole “Spike Lee Joint” I absolutely loved, and have no complaints about whatsoever, for which I have nothing but praise, is download-3_thumb1Passing Strange. That has everything to do with its actual writers, performers, and its real director, (Mark Stewart, who goes simply by, “Stew,”) and almost nothing to do with Spike Lee’s contribution, which was to record the finished product and make money off of it.

But, let’s look at Spike Lee’s real claim to fame: Do the Right Thing. Frankly, it should have been titled: Do the Wrong Thing. And yes, I know I’m not the first, nor will I be the last to make that pun. It could also have been titled:

Nigga’s got a Right!

In Do the Right Thing,  Spike Lee plays Mookie. He’s a deadbeat dad and malingering loaf, who works for Sal, the last of a generation of the Italian-American residents of the ‘hood. Sal runs a pizzeria, in which he hopes to maintain his heritage via posting pictures ofimages_thumb10 famous Italian-Americans on his wall, playing Italian music, and in general maintaining an Italian theme to his Italian premises. He’s got a strict rule about no boom boxes–a very big period fad in the “black community” when the film came out 25 years ago as of this writing–and he’s resisted leaving the neighborhood for years in spite of the urging of his sons who think he’s too nostalgic for his own good.

You can skip the entire first part of the movie because its just a lot of poorly lit, shot, do-the-right-thing-1989-rosie-perez-spike-lee-spike-lee-top-movieswritten and acted, aimless ambiance about Mookie’s environment, his eccentric neighbors and charming friends, intended to show us all how harmless and loveable they all are. It’s the part of the disaster movie where we meet and get to identify with all the characters who are going to end up trapped in a burning building or in an inverted ocean liner under the sea. Yeah-yeah. Slice of period black culture. Consider your childhood validated Spike. By the end of the film however, a handful of his pals become very aggressive social agitators. It becomes a matter of honor to images-11_thumb1bend Sal’s will until he concedes to get some “brothers” up on his trophy-photo wall, which is covered with the faces of famous Italian-Americans. One evening, this little posse bursts into his premises and confronts Sal with a lot of threatening demands about how he’d better get some black faces on his wall pretty soon, screamed right into his face, over the grating thump and wail of a very loud boom box. Sal argues with them for a long time, and then, after repeated warnings, when they refuse to shut off the boom box, Sal smashes it with a baseball bat.

The box’s owner, a “Gentle Giant” named Raheem, pulls Sal across the counter and begins to trounce him and choke him with insane impunity. A riot ensues and spills out into the street. The cops arrive to find Sal being strangled by Raheem, and it takes two cops and Sals’s1-gOu9NlRaMLouBd8oY4RcUg_thumb1 boys as helpers to eventually pull the “Gentle Giant” off of Sal, but then, apparently because even in Lee’s depiction, Raheem is still far from surrendering peacefully, one of the cops uses a baton to choke Raheem down and apparently teach him a lesson, though not apparently actually wanting to kill him. The cop continues the choke hold, even as his partner protests that Raheem has had enough. Consequently, Raheem is killed in front of what is by then the whole neighborhood.

Raheem_Police_Club_thumb1After the cops are gone and Raheem is hauled away and it’s all over, while the crowd has started to calm down, Mookie takes the very calculated opportunity to go over, get a trash can, calmly walk up to Sal’s front window and throw it through—thus sparking the complete pillaging of Sal’s shop, culminated by its torching by Smiley, who serves essentially as the village idiot.

Spike Lee’s message is clearly: Be true to the “Dumb Nigga” Inside You.

Did Mookie do the right thing?

Movie watchers have argued whether or not Mookie did the right thing by throwing the garbage can through Sal’s window. Though he destroyedo-SPIKE-LEE-facebook_thumb1 Sal’s pizzeria, it also distracted the mob from killing Sal himself. Spike doesn’t take too kindly to the question. In Spike Lee’s Do the Right Thing, a book about the political, social and history of the movie, Lee noted that only white viewers have ever asked him this question, revealing, in his opinion, that they value white property (Sal’s Pizzeria) over the black life (Radio Raheem).

http://madamenoire.com/213236/bet-you-didnt-know-secrets-behind-the-making-of-do-the-right-thing/9/#sthash.cZnq5O6H.dpuf

There is only one way to characterize Spike Lee’s claim that only white viewers ever ask if Mookie really did the right thing. He’s lying. Here’s one of many “credentialed” or “authentic” black reviewers that proves him wrong:

Do the Right Thing is still a powerful movie. But today many of the scenes that elicited cheers seem off the mark.

Sal’s racist son Pino tries to persuade his father to leave Bed-Stuy because black people didn’t want them there. Sal, played by Danny Aiello, defends the neighborhood, expressing spike-lee1_thumb1his pride that the people there had grown up on his food. Didn’t Sal have every right to be there?

And what of the supposed triumph at the end of the movie when Smiley pastes up a photo of MLK and Malcolm X on Sal’s Wall of Fame?

Watching it this time around, I found myself wishing to the very end of the film that the inevitable wouldn’t happen, that Sal’s pizzeria would not go up in flames at the hands of a black mob.

I am not immune to the charms of black nationalism. I’m a proud Howard University graduate raising my family in the middle of a blackdotherightthingjordans_std.original_ neighborhood in D.C., the Chocolate City. But I am also keenly aware of black nationalism’s lingering contradictions. Today, Bloomingdale, my D.C. neighborhood, is in the throes of gentrification: Yoga studios bump up against public housing projects; cafes clash with methadone clinics; farmers markets displace bodegas. Today, I see dozens of proverbial white men in Celtics jerseys, laying their historic claim to the neighborhood where their ancestors settled but where a black majority has lived for decades.

http://www.theroot.com/articles/politics/2009/06/why_mookie_did

_the_wrong_thing_in_spike_lees_film_do_the_right_thing.html

Speaking of gentrification…Spike had this to say about that:

Nah. You can’t do that. You can’t just come in the neighborhood and start bogarting and say, like you’re motherfuckin’ Columbus and kill off the Native Americans. Or what they do in Brazil, what they did to thedownload-8_thumb2 indigenous people. You have to come with respect. There’s a code. There’s people.

I mean, they just move in the neighborhood. You just can’t come in the neighborhood. I’m for democracy and letting everybody live but you gotta have some respect. You can’t just come in when people have a culture that’s been laid down for generations and you come in and now shit gotta change because you’re here? Get the fuck outta here. Can’t do that!

And we had the crystal ball, motherfuckin’ Do the Right Thing with JohnSpike-Lee-Kickstarter_thumb1 Savage’s character, when he rolled his bike over Buggin’ Out’s sneaker. I wrote that script in 1988. He was the first one. How you walking around Brooklyn with a Larry Bird jersey on? You can’t do that. Not in Bed Stuy.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/02/spike-lee-amazing-rant-against-gentrification.html

Spike Lee has the insight to be the “crystal ball” of urban renewal, but obviously doesn’t have the insight to see that he’s taking Sal’s side of the argument. That makes him a liar and a hypocrite.

Let’s review the plot so far:

images-18_thumb1Did Sal kill Raheem? No. It was Raheem nearly killing Sal.

Did Sal start a fight with Raheem? No. Raheem started the fight. Sal didn’t even call the cops. He was too busy getting strangled, and his sons were too busy trying to save his life.

Who’s place was it? Sal’s.

Who’s neighborhood was it? Sal’s. It was founded by Sal’s parents and grandparents and his ethnic people in general going back probably to the laying of the first cobblestone.

Who were the newcomers, the interlopers with no respect for the history and tradition of the neighborhood and its founders? Who’s “Bogarting” the ‘hood in Do the Right Thing? Who’s telling the founding residents of the community what music they have to listen to, and what ethnic icons of adoration they have to revere? Well, since the characters he depicts in Do the Right Thing are all his own  creation, thatimages-19_thumb1 would be Spike Lee. So again I say, by definition, that makes Spike Lee both a liar, and a hypocrite. And deaf, blind, and dumb as a post, not to see it. Or just completely disingenuous. And here’s another blaring legal and ethical point Spike Lee still can’t see, or for that matter, neither can the reviewer examining the film here:

Lee’s script marshals a rich cast of supporting characters, chief among them Radio Raheem (Bill Nunn), who paces the streets, blaring Public Enemy’s “Fight the Power” on a never-ending loop at full volume, and Buggin’ Out (Giancarlo Esposito), the would-be revolutionary who sits down that afternoon to eat his slice and suddenly notices that the “Wall of Fame” in Sal’s Pizzeria is inhabited only by Italian-Americans (Sinatra, DiMaggio, DeNiro, Pacino). He asks why “there aren’t any brothers on the wall.” Sal replies, not unreasonably, that it’s his place, and when Buggin’ Out gets his own place, he can put whoever he wants on his wall. Buggin’ Out retorts, also sensibly, that there aren’t a lot of Italian-Americans buying pizza in Sal’s joint, so maybe the wall of fame should include some black folks. (“Two valid points,” Lee maintains, on a recent audio commentary.)

http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/08/when-spike-lee-became-scary/261434/

Well, no Spike. Those are not both valid points. Buggin’ Out is not a partner in
Sal’s Famous Pizzeria. Kids who walk in off the street and occasionally purchase pie are not co-owners of the establishment. Not even if it’s “Nigga’s” ‘hood now. Random local youth have no legal or moral or ethical say in how a neighborhood proprietor decides to market his operation. Sal defines what is or isn’t a valid design scheme for his own wall. Sal has a valid point. Buggin’ images-21_thumb1Out has a point that might be valid if he actually had anything to say about what goes on Sal’s wall—which he doesn’t. Sal might deem Buggin’ Out’s point to be valid, and adopt his suggestion voluntarily. This of course depends upon what Sal feels might best attract his target clientele, or perhaps discourage a type of customer he’d rather not have to deal with. (That’s why they sometimes pipe loud classical music outside those convenience stores after dark…) Buggin’ Out may not have a valid point at all, because Sal is the validator and invalidator–Sal has God-like power and authority over the “validity” of what goes on his own wall. Spike Lee has no apparent understanding of, or respect for “property rights.”

Nigga’s” got a right…. that, he understands.

From his perspective, obviously Spike thinks he made his case clearly. But, even the way Spike Lee concocts it, Radio Raheem and his posse entered Sal’s restaurant while Sal was peacefully minding his own images-13_thumb1business. It was Raheem and his  friends, who  started a threatening, provocative argument, and blasted annoying music in Sal’s face until he couldn’t think straight. Sal was triple-ganged by Raheem, Buggin’ Out, and Smiley—two “Dumb Nigga’s” and a “Crazy-Ass Nigga.” Yes, they had tried reasoning with Sal briefly earlier in the day. They tried organizing a boycott to get Sal to give in to their demands, all to no avail. (This peaceful and legal strategy lasted for only a couple of hours before they got impatient and frankly, found no support in the community.) This time they announced that they were there essentially to physically force Sal to put up some pictures of black role models on his wall or there would be hell to pay. After many warnings to shut off the boom 4453424506_a6004c15cf_o_thumb1box, Sal destroyed the source of the music. It was not Sal who assaulted Raheem. It was Raheem, who clearly had a “Nigga Moment,” in which he decided it was worth his own life to avenge the lost of his “music,” and teach Sal that “Nigga’s got a right…” and “Don’t nobody disrespect this Nigga…”

What Spike Lee actually points out in Do the Right Thing, is that a “Dumb Nigga” values his ghetto blaster more than his own black life. But neither Spike Lee nor the “black community”wants to admit the fundamental truth of this proposition, nor will they allow any such notion to be entertained outside of “black community” circles.

That’s clearly “Dumb Nigga” thinking. That’s Spike Lee’s thinking. And that obviously makes him just another “Dumb Nigga.” But Spike Lee’s even dumber than that. Spike Lee went to college and got multiple degrees to be as dumb as he is. Spike Lee as an MFA in being dumb. In Lee’s fantasy world5086663_std_thumb1 of “blackness,” Mookie shows up in the morning on Sal’s freshly burned-out doorstep while Sal’s cleaning up the ashes and debris, demanding his wages for the last pay period. In real life Sal would have beaten his head in with the nearest blunt object. In Spike’s personal black wonderland, however, Sal says, “You burned down my shop,” and Mookie replies, “They killed Raheem.” In Spike Lee’s ethical system, that’s even. It’s perfectly sensible. That explains it all. In Spike Lee’s all-wise black fairytale, the big bad white man is humbled by Mookie’s simple logic, learns his lesson, concedes the point, and pays up. Sal admits quietly to himself that he brought this all down on himself. No hard feelings.

Watching that scene play out as a plain dumb white guy however, even as Spike Lee wrote them, directed them, I see plainly that Mookie is a weaseley little chiseler. And Sal is a big man with a big heart who realizes that Mookie really is just that stupid. Sal pays up as a point of honor, because Sal has honor, and Mookie doesn’t. But mainly, the kid just isn’t bright enough to ever understand what a self-centered little dickweed he is. Yeah, you took a stand Mookie. Now man-up and live with the consequences.

Back-pay my ass.

Enter video caption here

Enter video caption here

Enter video caption here

 

Now, there’s a much easier way to get into “justifying” burning down Sal’s pizza parlor: White cop kills black man. Sal’s the nearest white guy. Take revenge on nearest white guy. It’s blatantly racist, but that works too, for the “Dumb Nigga.” Though Spike Lee ql-0013-lee_thumb1has argued openly that a “Nigga” ain’t capable of racism, in Do the Right Thing, racism is clearly at play when the black mob is dissuaded from going after the Korean shop across the street, because the owner begs them away claiming “I’m just like you.” Spike Lee very clearly shows us a “black community” that is not only markedly racist, but eager to act out their hatred for all non-black races even when

michael_berg_2these neighbors had nothing to do with the dispute at hand. (Take that Reginald Denny…)

http://www.eurweb.com/2012/04/damien-football-williams-who-beat-trucker-reginald-denny-in-la-riots-breaks-silence/

Upon visiting South Africa in the early 90s, Spike Lee told London’s Guardian newspaper that “I seriously wanted to pick up a gun and shoot whites. The only way to resolve matters is by bloodshed.” And if we’re thinking of chalking that crazy remark up to Lee being carried away in his early 30s, not so fast. Flash forward to the present and we can see that Spike Lee has never met a racial metaphor or racist statement he didn’t like to use.

Lee saw Obama’s triumph in the Democrat primary as a chance to move Bill Clinton Democratic Conventionbeyond “massuh Clinton.” As Spike put it, “The Clintons, man, they would lie on a stack of Bibles…I voted for Clinton twice, but that’s over with. These old black politicians say, ‘Ooh, Massuh Clinton was good to us, massuh hired a lot of us, massuh was good!’ Hoo! Charlie Rangel, David Dinkins—they have to understand this is a new day.” Clarence_Thomas_official_SCOTUS_portrait

Of course, Lee has no use to Republican blacks including Justice Clarence Thomas and Gen. Colin Powell, both of whom he accuses of “think[ing] like whites.” Nor does he have any love for tyler-perry-in-madea-goes-to-jailsuccessful black moviemakers like Tyler Perry who he chided for producing “coonery and buffoonery.” Spike’s beef with Perry seems to originate in the fact that Perry is doing something Lee has seemed incapable of doing over the last decade—creating movies that actually make money and draw a crowd. download (44)

Spike Lee has even lashed out at Eddie Murphy, insinuating that he was a race traitor and Uncle Tom for selling out to a movie business dominated by white interests, as well as African American actors Ving Rhames and Cuba Gooding Jr. for behaving in a “servile” way.

http://humanevents.com/2012/03/26/spike-lee-hollywood-hatemonger/

Sounds pretty racist to me. The truth is, Spike’s overtly racist remarks and snide, bigoted personal attacks could fill volumes.

Films like Bamboozled (2000) and Mo’ Better Blues (1990) portrayed Jews as manipulative, evil racists…When Steven Soderbergh’s Sex, Lies, and Videotape beat out Do the Right Thing for the Cannes Film Festival’s Kobal 002coveted Palme d’Or award in 1989, Lee blamed racism, saying, “They’re always looking for their white golden boy.”

In 1991 Lee publicly reflected on how deeply he despised Lilies of the Field, the classic 1963 film depicting a respectful and loving relationship between a black handyman named Homer Smith (Sidney Poitier) and a convent of white nuns. “I hated that movie,” said Lee. “… I felt like putting a rock through the [TV] screen. Later with these nuns! You [Smith] better get outta here before one of ‘em [nuns] says that you raped ‘em! But we owe a lot to Sidney Poitier, because in order for us to get to where we are today, those films had to be made. And Sidney had to do what he had to do. He was the perfect Negro.”download (45)

In 2004 Lee told Playboy magazine that the NASCAR auto-racing association was a racist enterprise because there was a paucity of blacks among its fans, employees, and participants. Said Lee, “I just imagine hearing some country-and-Western song over a loudspeaker at NASCAR: ‘Hang them ni**ers up high! Hang them ni**ers up high!’ I’m not going to no NASCAR.”

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1990

In fact, in justifying Mookie’s final actions in Do the Right Thing, Spike himself has long owned-up to the overtly racist subtext he claims drives Mookie to start the riot:

There’s balance to it but no justice. Radio Raheem didn’t deserve to be killed for attacking Sal, while burning Sal’s Pizzeria to the ground onlydownload (47) makes sense if you remove Sal’s humanity and see him as a symbol of his race, a representative of the white establishment. Yet, according to Spike, that’s how Mookie sees him. In the director’s commentary, Spike explains it this way: “Sal’s Famous Pizzeria represents everything that oppressed [Mookie] and black people.” The irony with this kind of racial myopia, the reduction of Sal from man to symbol, is that, along with Troy from “Crooklyn” and Jake Shuttlesworth in “He Got Game,” Sal is probably the fullest character Spike Lee has ever created.

http://www.today.com/id/11965382/ns/today-today_entertainment/t/spike-lee-wakes/#.VExj2fldV8E

OK, so let’s pretend all Sal did was call the cops and wait. Sal patiently puts up with the rap music at 140db and the shouting in his face. Then in come the cops. Wouldn’t Raheem have ended up choked to death anyway? You know he was going to throw his “Nigga Moment” one way or another when they arrived to arrest him. Sal had essentially no input into the course of events. Raheem, and Spike Lee, fixed the end of the scene from the beginning. For the purposes of making whatever the hell Spike Lee thought his point was supposed to be when he wrote that film, those white cops were vlcsnap-2011-02-10-17h41m51s213_thumgoing to kill that black young man one way or another and the “black community” was going to call it unjustified no matter what. That’s the hereditary, legendary, mandatory “black community” narrative. I know if you go back far enough it used to be true more often than not. But this film, Spike Lee, and far too much of the “black community” are frozen in a time warp of irrelevance. Some of his growing lash-outs at other directors and motion pictures may have something to do with an impending realization that he’s got nothing worth saying any more. (And he says even that very poorly.)

Basically what Spike Lee is arguing in Do the Right Thing, is: “Nigga’s” got a right to throw a violent fit—a “Nigga Moment”—and when the cops come upon “Nigga” in his “Moment,”images (78) the cops have no right to meet black violence with white violence. Or more specifically, cop violence. (Cops, parents, and white folk are virtually the same thing in Spike Lee’s world view of black arrested adolescence.) White folk have to learn to respect the “Nigga Moment.” Yet, the matter of a vicious white, racist cop fatally choking out Raheem, trying to interrupt his fit of black homicidal lunacy, is almost inconsequential to the Spike’s actual message. Spike wrote that cop as a deliberately brutal thug to cover his own thesis, but in his mindless state of rage, Raheem in real life could have met his death a thousand other ways, including at the hands of an officer attempting to restrain and arrest him, quite accidentally. And cops might never even be involved in his death at all until long after he had met it. Raheem in real life could have assaulted Sal, and Sal could have stoved his brains in quite legally in self defense. He even had a bat handy. It could been a gun just as easily. Sal’s sons Vito and Pino could have whacked him on the back of the head with a chair or two, trying to get him off their father, and he could have slowly and painfully died from blunt force trauma hours or days later.

But’s that’s what real life holds in store for an angry young black man, and we’re talking Spike Lee here—not reality.

Spike Lee doesn’t pop up all that often in his films anymore, which is one reason why his brief appearance in his new film Red Hook Summer is so surprising. The other is that he’s carrying pizzas and sporting a “Sal’s Famous Pizzeria” t-shirt, returning to the role of “Mookie” that he played in Do The Right Thing 23 summers ago. Lee has gone out of his way to insistMay_ComingOfAge_04_480x340_thumb1 that Red Hook, in limited release now, is “not a motherfucking sequel to Do the Right Thing,” but the pictures are very hard to separate, and not merely because of Mookie’s return. Red Hook has polarized audiences and critics in a manner reminiscent of its predecessor (albeit on a smaller scale). “Lee’s latest rambles through almost two hours of unfocused drama, burdened with endless didactic editorializing, before lurching out of nowhere into ugly revelations and violence,” wrote The Hollywood Reporter, a quote which could well have been pulled from a negative review of Do the Right Thing.

http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/08/when-spike-lee-became-scary/261434/

In Do the Right Thing, Spike Lee and all of his cultural or cinematic apologists keep telling me he presents a finely crafted and complex study of the state of “racism” in America. All I saw was a movie about a “Dumb Nigga” who got himself killed over a pointless dispute about the wall décor of somebody else’s restaurant.

Spike Lee will tell you he’s showing you “black reality,” but, at best what Spike Lee is selling is his romantic childhood impression of “black reality.” Though he surely doesn’t see it himself to this Mookie_thumb7day, what Lee exposes is that even when Spike Lee completely controls the narrative, his black martyr Raheem still deliberately creates a violent scene for no legal reason, and dies at the hands of the cops only because he is in the middle of an uncontrolled rage, while willfully engaged in the process of attempted murder. Maybe Spike Lee really is just that stupid and thinks he made a really profound statement about “being black in a racist America.” Or, maybe he’s just making money off the brothers. But the only clear message the film offered to my white eyes and ears was: When push comes to shove, take that one calm moment where you could make it all better if you wanted. Think it over. Then, firm in your resolution, pick up the nearest garbage can and throw it through Sal’s window.2014-08-20-1b774aa2_thumb2

Do the Right Thing.

Have a “Nigga Moment.” You know you want to. Go ahead. Chimp out. You’ve been a good boy for a long time now. You earned it. Give the struggling KKK and other dwindling White Supremist groups of America some concrete evidence that they’re right. Show all those white racists, like Pino, Sal’s bigoted eldest son, they’ve been right all along.

Spike Lee today, is a walking anachronism. He’s mixed up universal youthful violence and stupidity with “blackness.” The sight of black folk and white folk looking, eating, living, earning, loving, laughing together makes him physically ill. He’s part of a mentality that entirely gave up on images (73)“being white” or having equal status with “whites,” just as it was coming into reality. He’s settled on a defeatist, black separatist vibe that tells itself the “Negro” will never be equal with the white man, so the only permanent solution to racial inequality in America is to forcefully and voluntarily segregate the “black community” from the greater “white culture,” ethnically cleanse the black neighborhoods, encourage black youth to be as “black as you can be,” strive not to become president of the United States of America, and seek rather to become the “Head Nigga in Charge.”

Here’s what Spike Lee didn’t tell you about how Mookie’s story really ends:

Sal made out like a bandit off Mookie’s little riot. He collected insurance, and moved his business to an affluent white suburb where he tripled his profits in his first month andslideshow_1158071_do_the_right_thing[2] expanded into a growing franchise that his sons inherited and manage today worldwide. Mookie on the other hand, put himself out of a job, and in the real world Sal would have told him to piss off, probably kicked his skinny black ass, and kept his back wages. Mookie’s dying neighborhood was out its favorite hangout and yet another employer. The Korean shop moved out two years later to avoid the constant threats, robbery and vandalism, and tumblr_inline_ml9q93YRGI1qz4rgp_thumboth their shop and Sal’s old husk of a pizza shop sit empty still today, along with most of the other former businesses that followed suit in a tide of economic flight from Mookie and his little playmates. The entire district has been condemned and is soon to be vacated after a generation of infestation by drugs, gangs, and a population exclusively of those dependent upon the public dole who were living out their fading lives in squalor provided by rich slumlords and paid for by my taxes. It’s due for “Urban Renewal” and has been sold for pennies on the dollar to a developer based in the Cayman Islands who will purge all remaining occupants, convert it to fashionable condominiums and green spaces, and sell them to wealthy young, white hipsters.

So, thanks Mookie. You screwed yourself and your whole neighborhood. And made a few more white guys rich in the process. You did the right thing.

Director Spike Lee has just started the clock on a 30-day attempt to raise $1.25 million through Kickstarter.com for an untitled movie about human beings who are addicted to blood that he calls “funny, sexy, and bloodyphoto-main_thumb1 (and it’s not Blacula).”

On the project’s Kickstarter page, Lee gives almost no details about the project. The moviemaker does not reveal the title, nor does he give more details about the film.

However, he does mention that there will be a lot of sex and that if we are fans of the work he’s done  in the past, and believe in him and his abilities as a filmmaker, he won’t disappoint. He welcomed all contributions to the campaign.

http://atlantablackstar.com/2013/07/23/spike-lee-launches-kickstarter-campaign-to-raise-1-25-million-for-unknown-film/

Posted in That "Race" Thang, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Do the Wrong Thing Part Two: Legend of the Gentle Giant

In 1967, the “black community” burned down Newark New Jersey, because they thought Newark_Riot__thumb1some white cops had roughed up and arrested a black taxi cab driver for illegally passing them. The cops were not at all kind to this offender. When “black community” leaders insisted he be given medical care, other elements in the “black community” who arrived later and noticed his empty cell, then decided he’d died in custody, even though he’d actually been moved to a hospital ward exactly as demanded by the “black community’s” leaders earlier in the day at a well publicized meeting. Days later, after millions and millions of dollars of destruction, death and mayhem, the “black community,” now in ashes, was eventually convinced to stop destroying its own neighborhoods. And it didn’t matter if they got it wrong. Maybe that driver wasn’t dead, but he was manhandled. Any excuse for a riot.

1967 was not a good time for racial justice in America yet, not even up north in Newark. I’ll admit that. The argument could be fairly and logically made that if you oppress a people they can take it just so long and then they lose all self-control and mindlessly lash out. But somewhere in that time period, just as their cause was won and the need for social violence and protest was waning, the “black communitydownload-6_thumb” learned instead, that rioting and outrage, even if affected, even if unfounded, was a rewarding cultural activity. It enriched its neighborhoods and built strength of character. It showed resolve. It showed determination. It became a bonding ritual. “Fight the Power.” It was like the “black community” version of Trick or Treating, or Guy Fawkes Night. It even turned out to be a great way to get goodies from “The Man.” Today the “black community” in large part still subscribes to riot and maniacal protest not because it’s necessary, but because it’s enjoyable. It’s drama. It’s one big community pageant. It’s the black American version of a Passion Play. And more than anything, it’s a lazy habit.

Today, “black America” knows that even the threat of a riot produces results for the “black community.” Riot and you get attention. Riot and you get rewarded. Threaten to riot and you get rewarded. And of course, the threat of a riot wouldn’t be very credible to the “white power structure,” if the “black community” didn’t occasionally pull one off as sample of its work.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_Newark_riots

That’s “Dumb Nigga Thinking.” Thinking like a “Dumb Nigga.” It’s all about perpetuating the social order that allows the “Dumb Nigga” to keep justifying why he’s still just a “Dumb Nigga” in spite of there being no compelling reason for him to remain in that condition—apart from the fact that indeed, he’s just a “Dumb Nigga.”

Brandy Green of the Trayvon Martin case you may recall, who the media kept calling Tracy Martin’s “fiancé,” disappeared quite suddenly and completely after her first couple of public interviews, never to be heard from again. (Just like Alicia Stanley-Martin, the woman who actually raised Trayvon.) Paid off, shamed off, chased off,images-53_thumb1 threatened off, it doesn’t matter much. These women slipped off into the cosmic ether like fog burning away in the new morning sun. That was yesterday, this is today. The “black community” is very keen on the liberation of the “black woman,” and all, but these “black women” no longer fit into the greater “black community” agenda. They thus became irrelevant to the “Justice for Trayvon” narrative and had to go. In the same way, any liability connected to the “black community” has to be purged from the public discourse—like the fact that all the physical evidence and half a dozen (black) witnesses substantiate Ferguson Missouri’s officer Darren Wilson’s version of how Mike Green got himself shot, or that all of this was known within weeks but the family and its black power base simply wouldn’t accept reality. The “black community” likewise, still isn’t accepting the fact that the Sanford Police Department, and local prosecutors had their facts right all along—there never was a case against George Zimmerman. Even Eric Holder and his federal civil rights mafia eventually had to moonwalk their way back to Washington and concede the point.

But the “black community” who burned down Ferguson when they heard the fabricated narrative on Mike Brown’s departure from this life, never were, and never will be interested in hearing the “truth,” and they don’t really want “justice.” Likewise, the facts and evidence of the Trayvon Martin killing were never really relevant to theimages (30) greater imperative of husbanding the hereditary, “black community” narrative–the gospel of perpetual “white” persecution. Ultimately, Trayvon Martin became just another sound bite, a catch phrase, a hoodie-clad icon that makes a clever poster, a snappy slogan on a picket sign. The sainted black martyr “baby Trayvon” provided a short-term boost to the “black community” theatre-going experience. Then he became “irrelevant,” except as a shorthand code word for, “hate Whitey.” Or more precisely, “blame Whitey.” And finally, by the time you read this, today or tomorrow or next year, Trayvon Martin will have become passé—so 2012.

And thus, along comes Michael Brown. Fresh horse for the “black community” express. The same old players in the “black community’s” neo-Civil Rights Era dramatical society production team immediately run down to Ferguson Missouri to do the images (14)outrage-and-camera-dance. Al Sharpton got the big prize as usual, scoring a slot as the center of attention at a funeral that should have been about Michael Brown, but instead was all about where Sharpton and Jackson and Benjamin Crump et al are getting their next big paycheck.

Eric Holder, director of “Operation Get Whitey” for the Obama administration, just announced his resignation, but not before he swooped down on Ferguson to launch, or at least fain to launch (for the sake of the support of the Democratic Party base in the upcoming elections) a federal civil rightsimages-17_thumb2 investigation of essentially how white cops deal with African-American young males in particular. It will proceed upon the assumption of “institutionalized racism” in general based upon the Ferguson PD statistics of stops and arrests. Other “civil rights” advocates around the nation have added their support to expanding the investigation nationally to examine how “cops” black or white treat young African-American males and black people in general.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/ferguson-police-federal-investigation/story?id=25250595

Sure. Why not. Unfortunately, what Holder found out within the first couple of weeks is that officer 0Darren Wilson’s story checks out and the “black community” fairy tale connected with Brown’s apparently self-initiated, stupid and pointless death is entirely untenable. Holder and the Obama administration however, have kept quite silent on the matter, because rioting in Ferguson insures black voter turnout in November.

The whole problem of analyzing why white cops shoot black young men on occasion, could also just be immediately fixed by requiring every cop everywhere to carry a body cam and images (10)dash cam and the real-live evidence thereby gained would prove that much of, if not most of the problem has to do with the way African-Americans in general treat or interact with “cops,” as if they were a warring tribe, or invading race, or rival “gang,” and not any inherently “authoritative” entity. A large portion of the “black community” openly argues that a cop has no more authority than anyone else off the street and that’s the way they treat the police—only, the cop thinks he has special status so he treats other citizens, black or white, as if he does have superior authority. Because he does. And the black person of course, resents being bossed around by somebody off the street with no more authority than anyone else on the street. They easily become pissed off and uncooperative if not outright belligerent. It must be said in particular, that download (13)so many young “black” Americans, male or female, are so pig-ignorant of the American legal system, the Constitution, the concept of civil authority, and civic responsibility in general, that all they can see in a cop, or bouncer, or security guard, or any general “authority” figure, particularly if they are “white,” is somebody harshing their buzz for no reason. They actually believe that “white people don’t have to take sh*t from the cops!” They think they’ve fought long and hard for liberation in America. They demand equal rights–so they think, since white folk don’t have to take sh*t from the copsthen black folk shouldn’t have to take sh*t from cops either.

Nigga’s gotta right…”

But white people, and young white males in particular, in the real world, have no equivalent tradition of “Nigga’s got a right.” No, they see a cop. They see somebody they’d better not cross. They don’t  see just some “Crazy-ass Cracker.” They expect to be in a shipload of trouble if they don’t play it cool with him or her. They have no “race card” or civil rights mafia at their back.

But let’s first take a look at the some of the fuzzy mathematics of this so-called clear indication of racial discrimination in the Ferguson PD arrest and traffic stop statistics:

Residents have said that the encounter between 18-year-old Michael Brown and an unidentified police officer began when the officer ordered Brown not to walk in the street. That sounds like an unimaginably small thing considering what was to follow, yet that small thing hints at an issue facing black residents of Ferguson and other cities.download-11_thumb1

While black residents accounted for 67 percent of Ferguson’s population, black drivers accounted for more than 86 percent of the traffic stops made last year by the Ferguson Police Department, according to a report produced by the office of Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster.

And the majority of the traffic stops (92 percent) that ended with arrests involved black drivers.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/08/12/the-breaking-point-for-ferguson/

http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimdalrympleii/blacks-overwhelmingly-get-stopped-by-the-police-in-ferguson#335icp1

The question then–for anyone not doped out on the Leftist, Establishment Opiate of the Masses—would be: is there anything in the way the average black person, particularly young black males, respond to authority figures, like cops, and particularly white authority figures, like white cops, that almost insures that they are going to get stopped, and if stopped, even more certainly assures that they will be arrested? Are black males just bad drivers? Is there anything images (14)about the way young black males in particular deport themselves in general, that might be prone to attract attention and arouse dismay and suspicion in white folks, or cops in particular–white or otherwise? It would be easy to mitigate the mildly disproportionate statistical representation of black v white stops and arrests in the “black communities,” of places like Ferguson Missouri, if it’s simply a matter of a fair percentage of the town’s black people driving poorly in defective vehicles, looking pissed off, acting like they’re guilty of something, or in general, just acting crazy all the time.

Well, surely there’s bound to be some of the latter. And historically, that’s obviously due to white people in general, and white cops in particular, not being very fair or nice to black images (32)people in general. Encounters with the police have traditionally always set black folk on edge. That’s bound to affect behavior or at least demeanor. And, in 1957, I would have been right there with you on the picket lines protesting it all. (Except you’d have to wait until March of that year for me to be born first.)

But isn’t it just as likely in this modern era, that these statistics merely prove the case of “white” people having learned how not to get stopped and not get arrested, even if they do attract the attention of the police? Is it really a valid proposal that all white people and cops in particular, have some unwritten, moral and legal obligation to accommodate whatever hostile or bizarre eccentricities the “black community” cares to claim as “historic” or “ebonic” or “part of the black culture?” Isn’t that just admitting that the “black community” endorses a self-images (17)imposed apartheid and chooses to relegate itself to a permanent sub-class of what is more broadly considered to be “civilized,” “American” or ihasadream“Western” society? Isn’t that just an euphemism for saying that the “black community” has canonized the “Dumb Nigga,” as a treasured cultural icon and “Nigga-ness” is its universal baseline of standard social conduct?

Before you give me guff about my tone or word choice, don’t insult my intelligence or powers of discernment by pretending that the “black community” doesn’t say the same thing in far more pointed and colorful ways safely within the haven of the local barbershop or beauty parlor. I’ve seen the movie. And Bill Cosby has said worse.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-cosby-tells-don-lemon-black-men-need-to-raise-their-kids-has-message-for-no-groes/

What if we just examine the testimony of one of those young black males who claim the “white power structure” is victimizing them–Mike Brown’s best buddy, Dorian Johnson? He’s the main creator of the current Michael Brown “hands-up” narrative, and even his version inadvertently confesses that he and Mike were walking down the middle of the street and basically told the cop ordering them out of the road to piss off:

Dorian Johnson, the primary witness to the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, has an outstanding warrant for a 2011 theft in Jefferson City and pleaded guilty for filing a false police report related to that theft.

St. Louis ABC affiliate ABC 17 cross referenced Johnson’s name against several records and discovered the warrant.

downloadJohnson will be the star witness for any potential prosecution proceedings against Officer Darren Wilson for the shooting of Brown. Johnson was walking with Brown when the shooting occurred.

He has already done multiple media appearances where he falsely claimed Brown was shot by Wilson in the back.  He also has claimed that Brown never reached for Wilson’s gun, was “shot like an animal” and that Brown had his hands up and told Wilson he was unarmed.

images-285_thumb1

Johnson’s claims helped inspire the protests and riots in Ferguson over the past 10 days, as well as the “Hands up, don’t shoot” rallying cry of the protesters and their supporters.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch has details about the 2011 charges against Johnson:

During the summer after his first semester at Lincoln, Johnson was 1408737716431_wps_14_Dorian_Johnsoncharged with a misdemeanor after giving police a false first name after he was arrested on suspicion of theft. He later pleaded guilty.

He was accused of stealing a package containing a backpack belonging to someone else from an apartment complex. When he was arrested in that case, he identified himself as Derrick Johnson and said he was 16.

He is wanted for failing to appear in Jefferson City municipal court to answer to the theft charge, court officials said.

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/170048-star-witness-

download (1)michael-brown-shooting-charged-theft-filing-false-police-report/

Johnson got his defense into the “black community” mythos early. Initial representations claimed he was a “witness,” to Mike Brown’s death, but of course, it turned out he was actually Mike Brown’s accomplice in a strong-arm robbery at the time. His NAACP handlers saw to it that his several evolving and ever-more-self-flattering versions of the incident became widespread almost overnight with the help of CNN. A lengthy transcript of one of his interviews is here:

http://www.democracynow.org/2014/8/12/the_killing_of_michael_brown_missouri

But, in truth, at the time, the only eye-witness who apparently claimed to have seen the whole incident in completion and in context, has yet to be publicly identified. In fact, very few main media sources have been interested in pursuing his identity, nor his testimony, even though it was posted inadvertently on You Tube almost instantaneously after Brown’s death:

A previously unnoticed detail in a background conversion of a video taken minutes after the Ferguson shooting could change the course of the investigation into Mike Brown’s death.

The original video poster appears sympathetic to the narrative that Mike Bimages-26_thumb1rown was shot unarmed with his hands in the air. But he unknowingly picks up conversation between a man who saw the altercation and another neighbor.

An approximate transcription of the background conversation, as related by the “Conservative Treehouse” blog, who originally discovered the conversation:

@6:28/6:29 of video

#1 How’d he get from there to there?

#2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck

{crosstalk}

#2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him

{crosstalk}

#2 Then the next thing I know he doubled back toward him cus - the police had his gun drawn already on him –zv

[there is dispute here whether he says “doubled back” or “coming back.”]

#1. Oh, the police got his gun

#2 The police kept dumpin on him, and I’m thinking the police kept missing – he like – be like – but he kept coming toward him

{crosstalk}

#2 Police fired shots – the next thing I know – the police was missing

#1 The Police?

#2 The Police shot him

#1 Police?

#2 The next thing I know … I’m thinking … the dude started running …images (70) (garbled something about “he took it from him”)

This is terribly important because if Mike Brown had been shot, and he advanced towards the cop instead of surrendering, it would substantiate the narrative that the policeman shot in self-defense due to the fact that he was being threatened with severe bodily harm. This corroborates an account of the event given by a friend of Officer Darren Wilson:

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/08/168698-eyewitness-recalls-important-detail-background-video-mins-ferguson-shooting/]

This would be interesting in and of itself, but more so, since it substantiates the independently given initial account of the event as  claimed by officer Wilson.

Earlier, another friend who identified herself only as Josie called “The Dana Show” on radio station KFTK to say that Wilson told her the tall, burly Brown, 18, had “bum-rushed“ him before the shooting.

images (68)Josie — who said she heard the version from Wilson’s girlfriend — said the cop encountered Brown and his pal Dorian Johnson walking down the middle of a street, pulled up and ordered them onto the sidewalk.

Wilson then noticed the pair were carrying cigars, and had heard the report of the robbery and recognized the pair as possible suspects.

“And he’s looking at them and they got something in their hands and it looks like it could be what, you know, those cigars or whatever. So he goes in reverse back to them,” Josie said.

Wilson, she said, “tries to get out of his car. They slam his door shut violently. I think he said Michael did. And then he opened the car again. He tried to get out. He stands up.

“And then Michael just bum-rushes him and shoves him back into his car. Punches him in the face and then Darren grabs for his gun. Michael grabbed for the gun. At one point he got the gun entirely turned against his hip. And he shoves it away. And the gun goes off,” Josie said.

“Well, then Michael takes off and gets to be about 35 feet away. And Darren’s first protocol is to pursue. So he stands up and yells, ‘Freeze!’ imaasdfagesMichael and his friend turn around. And Michael taunts him … And then all the sudden he just started bum-rushing him. He just started coming at him full speed,” she told the station.

“So [Wilson] really thinks [Brown] was on something, because he just kept coming. It was unbelievable. And so he finally ended up, the final shot was in the forehead, and then he fell about two to three feet in front of the officer,” she said.

http://nypost.com/2014/08/19/witnesses-say-ferguson-teen-attacked-cop-before-shooting/

The story officer Wilson told to these friends, is apparently the same story more or less imaasdfasestold by the first actual full-event eye-witness who inadvertently recounted the event only moments after-the-fact on the YouTube video. Every single other so-called “witness” in the media so far, came forward a day, days, weeks later repeating essentially the story Dorian Johnson had by then standardized all over the neighborhood–a story that fit the poor, innocent, “Dumb Nigga” boilerplate narrative perfectly.

If you listen to the phone-camera operator and his female partner in the discussion linked below, you can hear them spontaneously fabricating the “black community’s” Mike Brown story bit by bit as they stand there ironically, simultaneously admitting that they actually didn’t see a thing:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/08/18/youtube-video-captures-purported-witness-backing-police-version-in-ferguson/

As I write this, bits of the testimony and evidence from the grand jury hearing is leaking out. The short version is: Mike Brown assaulted officer Darren Wilson first by slammingnewprotests him back into his car, then through the window of his vehicle and/or the open door, there was a furious struggle over the officer’s gun. Mike was shot in the hand grabbing at it. Mike bled on the officer, his gun, and all over inside of his car. Half a dozen black, neighborhood witnesses have testified that Brown was at the police vehicle, beating on Wilson, then lit out and Wilson came out of the vehicle shooting. Then Brown turned back on him. Contrary to a few self-interested perjurers and internet liars, like Dorian Johnson, Brown made no obvious gesture of surrender and was killed at fairly close range, charging Wilson exactly as the officer contended. This is supported by blood spatter analysis, gunshot residue, the several autopsies, and multiple witnesses. Most of this was all known at the time of the original autopsy, yet the family paid for two more of their own, trying to make the physical evidence come out differently, because it simply didn’t fit the narrative they had already written for Mike and the “black community” agenda. But by then, they’d set loose the dogs of riot and canonized the “Justice for Mike Brown” litany.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/new-evidence-supports-officers-account-of-shooting-in-ferguson/2014/10/22/cf38c7b4-5964-11e4-bd61-346aee66ba29_story.html

Holder ‘exasperated at Ferguson leaks

On Wednesday, Attorney General Eric Holder told Justice Department lawyers who are conducting an independent federal inquiry of the shooting and an investigation of the Ferguson Police Department that he is “exasperated” at the “selective flow of information coming out of Missouri,” a Justice official said.

In addition to the autopsy information, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch download (11)published this week accounts of testimony presented to a St. Louis County grand jury.

Holder called the leaks “inappropriate and troubling” since both the federal investigation and the grand jury proceedings are ongoing, the Justice official said.

Holder said he is highly suspect of local authorities, the Justice official said, because the recent leaks are reminiscent of the decision by local police to release surveillance video showing Brown stealing cigars from a convenience store just before the deadly police confrontation.download (12)

Holder, at the time, denounced the release of the video as intended to skew perception of the case.

In an interview with CNN this week, Holder tried to temper expectations on the streets of Ferguson. He noted that when he traveled to Ferguson in an attempt to calm tensions, he promised two things: a fair investigation and reform of the Ferguson police.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/22/justice/ferguson-michael-brown-autopsy/index.html

Four points about Holder’s take on Ferguson: 1 His very presence, his very insertion into the case is an attempt to “skew perception of the case.” 2 His promise of a fair investigation presumes there wasn’t one going on, and he could have no idea whether there was orHolder-Columbia-montage wasn’t at the time. 3 His promise to “reform” Ferguson’s police departement presumes he has that authority, which he doesn’t, not unless he’s proven a case against them and a federal court has made a ruling on it, so again, this promise is a blatant attempt to “skew perception of the case.” 4 The Brown family team, Barack Hussein Obama, and Eric Holder initiated the “skewing of perceptions of the case” when they coined the phrase “gentle giant” and spread their riotingdownload (25) minions into the night to prance in front of riot squads and cameras, with signs and firebombs, while play-acting Mike’s fictional “surrender,” and eventually to loot, pillage, and throw Molotov cocktails into the Quick Trip.

But the truth is, Eric Holder isn’t exactly neutral in his racial politics. Eric Holder came of age in a black-separatist gestalt where only “black people” demand “justice.” White people prevent justice. Holder simple hasn’t shown any willingness to see it any other way.

A while ago, The Daily Caller reported that, as a student at Columbia StudentTakeoverCornell1969University, Eric Holder participated in an armed takeover of the University’s former ROTC office. John wrote about this at the time, but I want to expand.

According to the Daily Caller, Holder was among the leaders of the Student Afro-American Society (SAAS), which demanded that the former ROTC office be renamed the “Malcolm X Lounge.” The change, the group insisted, was to be made “in honor of a man who recognized the importance of territorydownload (20) as a basis for nationhood.”

This statement shows the separatist nature of the group Holder helped lead. And, indeed, Stefan Bradley, professor of African-American studies at Saint Louis University and author of the 2009 book “Harlem vs. Columbia University,” has described the Columbia organization as separatist.

The Daily Caller’s information comes in part from statements by a friend of Holder at Columbia and in part from Holder himself. The friend, Steve Sims, told GQ magazine that he, Holder, and others “took over the ROTC lounge in Hartley Hall and created the Malcolm X Lounge.” GQ calls Simsimages (52) “the attorney general’s closest friend” and “a man Holder describes as his ‘consigliore.’”

Holder himself said in a 2009 speech that he and his fellow students decided to “peacefully occupy one of the campus offices.” Presumably, this was the ROTC office.

The information that the occupiers were armed comes from a deleted Web page of the Black Students’ Organization (BSO) at Columbia, a successor group to the SAAS. It states: “In 1970, a group of armed black students seized the abandoned ROTC office on the first floor of Hartley Hall.” If this account is correct, then Holder either has forgotten about the arms, pretends there were no arms, or means that the occupation was “peaceful” in the sense that no one was shot.

Student takeovers of college buildings were all too common on Ivy League download (17)and others campuses during this period. Armed takeovers were not. However, guns were not unheard of when Black students conducted the building takeovers. The most notorious example occurred in 1969 at Cornell. A picture of armed black Cornell students made it into Newsweek Magazine.

Forty years later, Holder still seems proud of his militant activity. During a 2009 commencement speech at Columbia, he boasted: “I was among a large group of students who felt strongly about the way we thought the fulleratmxluworld should be, and we weren’t afraid to make our opinions heard.” He didn’t add that they felt so strongly they violated the law and, it would appear, armed themselves in the process.

Nor did Holder tell his audience what, specifically, he and his comrades felt so strongly about. As noted, his outfit — SAAS –favored racial separatism. Additionally, according to Professor Bradley, they actively supported the Black Panthers, who were widely viewed by black campus radicals as role models.

Indeed, the Daily Caller reports that in March 1970, the SAAS released a download (16)statement supporting twenty-one Black Panthers charged with plotting to blow up department stores, railroad tracks, a police station and the New York Botanical Gardens (what the Botanical Gardens ever did to the Black Panthers, I don’t know). And they held a campus rally on March 12, 1970 featuring Afeni Shakur — one of the Panthers out on bail and the future mother of rapper Tupac Shakur.

Among the black Columbia professors who publicly supported Holder anddownload (18) the SAAS during this period was Black history teacher Hollis Lynch. Holder says that Lynch is one of four professors who has “shaped my worldview.”

As Attorney General, Holder presided over a Justice Department that declined to prosecute members of the New Black Panther Party who intimidated white voters (with a club, not guns) outside a Philadelphia polling precinct in 2008. Does part of the “worldview” Holder formed at Columbia consist of the notion that, when it comes to race, you have to break some eggs to make an omelet?

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/12/portrait-of-the-attorney-general-as-a-young-militant-2.php

http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/30/as-college-sophomore-eric-holder-participated-in-armed-takeover-of-former-columbia-university-rotc-office/

The problem is, I don’t believe the “black community” can solve any of its problems until it first, admits there is such a thing as a “Dumb Nigga,” and then admits there’s nothing romantic or heroic or more “authentically black” about being one. They aren’t reliable.images (54) They aren’t honest. Their first instinct is to lie or just spin a story to cover their own asses. They aren’t a credit to the race—not the “black” race, not the human race. They actually are too stupid for their own good. It’s not an act. It’s not “cool.” They’ll riot and loot at the drop of a hat. And they are aided and abetted by a “community” of fellow “Dumb Niggas” who are happy to expand the lies and delusions of any one in their brotherhood. At this moment there is a whole town full of them in Ferguson Missouri standing at the line, just waiting for the starting gun to go off if the grand jury doesn’t indict officer Wilson for the “assassination” of Mike Brown.

 

“I think there’ll be a bunch of trouble if something right don’t happen,” said René Jones, who lives in an apartment opposite the makeshift memorial to Brown, of tributes, candles, signs and stuffed toys, that has grown up on the spot in the street where he died. “There’s nothing that’s going to convince people around here that it’s not the system protecting its own if Wilson walks free.”

Across the road, Norma Webb was leaning over a balcony.

“The justice system isn’t doing its part,” she said. “They need to indictCasdfapture Darren Wilson. That’s what’s got everyone enraged. They are ducking and diving. We want justice. Even though he’s a cop he should be treated the same as everybody else.”

The man next to her, who give his name as Big Woody, interjected.

“It’s going to get real ugly if they don’t indict him,” he said.

Webb agreed.

“I pray to god this is settled in a human manner,” she said.

Among the city’s white residents, the mood is no less concerned.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/oct/19/ferguson-awaits-grand-jury-decision-michael-brown-killing

Now of course, if you care to argue that there is no such thing as a “Dumb Nigga,” or that “Dumb Niggas” won’t just fabricate a load of BS for the sake of a good rant and a shot at some payback at “Whitey,” have a look and listen at one of them here…my case in point:

 

By the way, the fellow above is enjoying some “Purple Drank” or “Lean,” or “Sizzurp,” with his friends as he rants. This is the drink made famous by Trayvon Martin and other young black males indownload (4) the “thug life” community. It consists of codeine-laden prescription cough syrup and some choice of fruit juice, often grape or watermelon, ice tea, but originally mainly lemon/lime soda, and sometimes sweetened with Skittles or Jolly Rancher candies for sweetness. Again, I remind you that this “crazy” YouTube character wasn’t anywhere near the Michael Brown killing and is nothing more than a leaned-out parrot for whoever and whatever he’s heard on the street or online.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_drank

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=purple%20drank

And more to the point, here are a few pictures of some of Mike Brown’s personal friends, pulled out of his social media contacts, flashing gang signs, as is Mike himself in a few:

http://charlestonthuglife.net/2014/08/14/what-a-sham/

download (3)

All of these web sites, like those “thug life” web pages of Trayvon Martin, were almost immediately deleted and purged of years of gang-related and thuggish poses, references to violent and homicidal boasts and desires. But in Brown’s case, we really don’t need to look at anything more than his highlight reel in the Quick Trip to get some insight into his “gentle” character.

ScreenHunter_7441-Aug.-14-16.56

 

ScreenHunter_7439-Aug.-14-16.56_thumScreenHunter_7437-Aug.-14-16.14_thum

ScreenHunter_7437-Aug.-14-16.19

Now, two construction workers have recently submitted testimony, some two months after-the-fact, and appear in a video apparently watching the Michael Brown shooting from well across the way, and one of them does appear to raise his arms–which CNN, other media and these witnesses now claim was illustrating what Michael Brown was doing just before he was shot.Capture Unfortunately, this doesn’t actually record the event in progress, and the man doesn’t actually raise his arms as if in surrender, just lifts them a bit like a large “shrug,” as if in dismay at what he’s looking at. They too claim to have only seen the last few seconds of the incident, and claim that by the time Brown was stopping, turning around, and, in their estimation “surrendering,” he’d already been shot, and the officer in question was already in hot pursuit with his gun blazing.

One of Michael Brown’s “thug life” buddies from social media

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/13/michael-brown-shooting-video_n_5815072.html

And that’s where all witnesses except one pick up the story–the last few seconds of Michael Brown’s life, at which point he had already had a major, bloody fight with a cop, and the cop he’d just roughed up was already in a highly charged fighting stance with a gun drawn and images-25_thumb1 firing. For some reason, none of the “black community” of Ferguson Missouri, or the US of A  in general, has any interest in exploring how Michael Brown ended up in that position in the last few seconds of his life. They’ve already decided who’s fault it was. It’s got to be that the cop is a racist killer, and that’s the end of reasoning. None of the “black community” seems it to be unreasonable to expect this officer to relax, take a clear-headed pause from his course of pursuit at the first hint of submission, and instantly calm down long enough to have a chat with our dear Michael, and see if the large violent monster he’d just been manhandled by has suddenly come to a state of repentance. It’s entirely incumbent upon the cop to make that split-hair decision and get it right. One can’t suggest Mike Brown was the chief instigator who led himself to his own fatal predicament. It wasn’t Mike Brown who put this cop into the “shoot or no shoot” drill.

No, that’s “blaming the victim.” That’s “character assassination.”

Michael Brown brushing aside the clerk/owner of the Quick Trip.

 

The latest audio recording to appear in the Michael Brown case pretends to record the audio death of Mike Brown in the background as two homey’s are recording something else in the vicinity. Basically, if it’s genuine, Mike Brown’s death comes down to 12 seconds. That’s a blink of an eye for some beaten-up, infuriated cop,  trying to decide just what this “Crazy Nigga” is trying to do—turn and charge, or just give up.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-28797288

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/10/breaking-grand-jury-witness-says-mike-browns-hands-were-not-up-when-shot-handsdowndontshoot/

If Mike Brown was a plain dumb white boy, we’d all say, well, what the hell did you expectDIS-HOW-GET-MONEY-GOONS-GET-DAT-PAPER-WE-CERTIFIED-G.M.G-NIGGAS was going to happen Mikey? You didn’t see that comin’? But as bizarre as it seems to the average white dude, the only “logical” answer that will satisfy the “black community,” is that officer Darren Wilson is a white racist pig who wanted to kill a young black male because he hates “Niggers,” and he picked Mike Brown randomly off the street and shot him for no reason. Certainly, for those who rioted in the streets of Ferguson, and now crouch in the starting blocks waiting to have another go at the town, as well as all of their supporters and apologists, there is no exploration of the facts or circumstances leading up to the death of Michael Brown that could ever suggest that any course of action decided upon by Michael Brown was a factor contributing in any way to his own demise. The only important issue for the “black community” of Ferguson Missouri, or the American “black community” in general, is why officer Wilson didn’t take that peaceful, 31f6bc410f89d36a9e045858ad78d20d.500x252x18last second pause–why he didn’t instantly recognize or care that Brown was suddenly trying to surrender, in-between all the flying lead. In the “black community,” responsibility for Mike Brown’s death is never going to be credited in any small portion to Mike Brown or anything he said or did.–no matter how blatantly obvious it might be that Mike Brown in large part did himself in.

But consider this proposition for a moment:

If “Dumb Niggas” in the “black community” actually are in the habit of saying and doing things that keep getting THESE-HOES-DRIVING-A-NIGGA-CRAZYthem shot, beat down, choked-out, and arrested by the police, then unless they stop that behavior, then “Dumb Niggas” are going to keep getting shot, beat down, choked-out, and arrested by the police. The color of the cop is almost irrelevant. (The bruthuh’z not black, he’s blue…) What if it really isn’t all down to cops, or even the nature of Whitey in general? Can’t it be conceded at least that it is not the nature of even fellow “Dumb Niggas” to give a “Dumb Nigga” the complete benefit of the doubt and wait till the very last second to see if “Dumb Nigga’s” just venting, merely playing the thug, just shooting his mouth off, or if “Dumb Nigga’s” really going to “chimp out” and do something injurious or fatal to himself or others? Cops are certainly never going to be trained to just chill out and wait and see if anyone gets hurt or killed before they put down a perceived threat. That’s an asinine suggestion on its face. They’re not going to casually take a beating a while before they pull the trigger, just to make sure it’s got the appearance of “fairness” for the sake of the “community,” black or white.

But the “black community” refuses to even think that way. Michael Brown could have beaten Darren Wilson to a pulp in his truck, dragged his limply flopping body out the door and kicked him up and down the street, grabbed his gun, and in the final struggle over it, if by lucky chance officer Wilson hfad managed to get a round into him, just as the struggling officer was drifting intodownload (29) unconsciousness, even then the “black community” would still cry “foul” because Brown was “unarmed.” Brown didn’t really pose a threat to the officer. Brown wouldn’t have really beaten the officer to death. Wilson should have taken his “ass whoopin'” like a man and gotten over it. The “black community” argues that cops and “white” America just need to be educated on how black folks and young black males in particular dress and talk and deport themselves. “White” America has to be trained to accept the way “black” America culturally responds to authority figures. America has to change. That’s what’s going to end these tragic deaths.

We don’t have to guess. We just went through that very scenario in the Georgedownload (30) Zimmerman trial. Any black person doing anything quite apparently shady or even anything that blatantly arouses the suspicions of the police is automatically defended and justified by the “black community” as a victim of white oppression of “black culture.” Black people count on the Democratic Party as a whole, and a co-conspiratorial white liberal media, to sell America on buying that argument perpetually–all evidence to the contrary be damned. It’s a major element of the black power structure in the United States:

The “Django Unchained” actress who cried racism against the LAPD … claiming they harassed and hurt her because she was just making out with her white boyfriend in a car — has some explaining to do, because we obtained pictures that seem to show A LOT more than sucking face.
The pictures were taken Thursday outside the CBS lot in Studio City. You see Daniele Watts straddling BF Brian — their hands steadying themselves around the sunroof.
0916_danielle-watts-django_sex_in_car_wm_sub
An eyewitness who saw Daniele and Brian as he worked in a nearby office tells TMZ … Brian was sitting in the passenger seat with his feet on the curb and Daniele was straddling him with her shirt pulled up — breasts exposed.  The eyewitness says she was grinding on top of him, rocking back and forth.

Someone from the office went down and asked Daniele and Brian to stop because everyone in the office could see them but they continued.
0916_danielle-watts-django_sex_in_car_wm_sub2
The eyewitnesses say Brian then began “horizontally bongoing her boobs back and forth.” He says she eventually reached into the center console, grabbed a tissue, wiped him down and then herself and tossed it on the grass.

Someone from the office called the cops and made an indecent exposure complaint. TMZ obtained police audio when the cops came out, and Daniele played the race and fame cards.

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/09/17/django-unchained-actress-racism-lapd-daniele-watts-pictures-photos/#ixzz3Fn9TyRLL

There isn’t any question by now that Danielle Watts was in fact grinding and humping 1410885124034_wps_1_Django_Unchained[1]away in a public place—something she doesn’t exactly even deny in a CNN interview she gives soon afterward. She even boasts about having the right to get as passionate as she wants in public, she believes, as long as she keeps her clothes on. And of course, she’s wrong there. And she’s clearly lying that the LAPD involvement had anything to do with either mistaking her for a prostitute, or because she’s black and her boyfriend’s white. Nobody ever accused her of being a prostitute. Danielle Watts wasdownload (58) committing lewd acts in public and somebody called the cops on her because she was being lewd—not because she was a black woman kissing a white boyfriend. She was humping in a car in public. And when her lewd behavior prompted a visit from the nice LAPD officers, she did everything within her power to provoke and escalate a simple request for ID into a major police incident. Personally I think she was hoping to get tazed and beaten, but the cops weren’t falling for it.

http://www.tmz.com/2014/09/15/django-actress-daniele-watts-lapd-race-card-fame-audio/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAbP5I_zTvQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lUxQYXZIJs

Which brings us to another recent cry of “wolf” from the oppressed “black community:”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVvXN580e_8download (60)

This black Oakland firefighter, not knowing that the cop had been wearing a body camera and the whole incident had been recorded, went on local television to describe his “ordeal” asserting that it was clearly down to racism:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcQC2Y8k9MU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAbP5I_zTvQdownload (61)

And while this Oakland firefighter claims he wasn’t download (63)given an apology and was subjected to life-threatening interrogation for “several minutes,” and that the cop wouldn’t let his sons lower their hands even though he asked nicely, none of that was true. The body cam shows a perfectly routine, calm, and very brief encounter during which the officer was professional and polite, and finished with a sincere apology for the misunderstanding.

090723_Henry_Louis_Gates (1)Remember the “beer summit?” Henry Louis Gates had a hissy fit on his front porch because he was trying to break into his own house and a neighbor called the police to investigate what was going on over there. Maybe his agitated, uncooperative, possibly threatening demeanor toward the arriving officers came down mostly to being insulted that, as a famous PBS personality the cops didn’t immediately recognize him.Harvard Scholar Disorderly (Perhaps cops don’t watch PBS?) But, oh no, black people don’t culturally respond to police or authority figures, in counter-intuitive ways that only work against their best interest. Nobody’s ever observed that at all. And, oh yes, it’s entirely down to the Cambridge Massachusetts police department acting “stupidly” in the words of America’s first black president.

http://www.katu.com/news/national/52102247.html

Obviously, black people know all about the “race card” and how to use it to their advantage. download (31)And yes indeedy, I’m saying the “black community” knows they’re always in possession of a magical “get out of jail free” ticket. And rather a lot of them will pull it out of a sleeve at every convenience. But, they also know the race card is losing its value. And that’s an uncomfortable place for much of the “black community” to be headed for. It used to be an easy-win. For the last couple of generations, all they had to do was pull the race card and “Whitey” had to back down. But that whole old order is collapsing. It’s getting harder and harder for plain dumb white, and plain dumb people of color in America to simply assume that “racism” is always going to be the key element in the matter any time “black” people are in trouble with the law.

For example: Even given Dorian Johnson’s overtly biased input, the Michael Brown story goes from a robbery, to blocking the street while transporting stolen goods, to telling a cop essentially to piss off, to what even Johnson admits was a violent tussle in and out or over and through the officer’s vehicle door. And then Brown runs. (Just what Johnson was doing all this time is dubious.) That’s three, four or five stages beyond Michael Brown “minding his own business,” as Johnson claims when he begins his cover-story. That’s maybe a half a dozen opportunities to not get shot, to not even get into trouble at all–long before there’s a cop, white or not, looking to pull a gun on him.

What is it about black folks, and black young men in general, (only we plain dumb white guys apparently might ask) that compels them to say and do exactly what’s necessary to draw the attention of law a86cece467d628b7d8214ed6ad25f05f.960x870x1enforcement to themselves in a negative way, and then rapidly progress through the encounter in a direction and with an attitude that can surely be designed only to make the absolute worst out of the situation?

And, even in an event like that of the Oakland firefighter, where he deported himself perfectly, where the cop responded calmly, professionally, and with courtesy—why do black folk invariably come out of such dealings with “white authority figures”  claiming they’d just been through some hellish ordeal that insulted their very humanity? And this, always simply because they are “black?”

So, no, the popular account of Michael Brown’s death is completely implausible right up till about the fifth or sixth phase. At that point we find “Dumb Nigga” Michael Brown dealingimages (18) with a really pumped-up cop who’s already fired on him, is actually in the process of still firing at him, and has a hair-trigger ready to continue. Perhaps by the time Michael Brown decided to stop messing with him, by the time Mike realized that this cop really would plug him, officer Wilson just didn’t give a damn, literally didn’t trust him for a second, and certainly didn’t trust him coming back at him at any speed whatsoever, fictional hands up or not. Even if we give Dorian Johnson’s now blatantly debunked testimony as much leeway as reason can muster, isn’t it still putting a lot of faith in the powers of observation of a police officer who’s already decided the “Not-so Gentle Giant” needed to be killed, to demand that he instantly discern that at the last second, Mike Brown suddenly had a change of heart and at the moment of his death he had actually decided to throw in the towel?

Well, of course it is.

So I ask you: is the name of the game as a young black male to see just how pissed off you can get a cop before he shoots you dead? Is that the primary “right” that “Nigga” has then? If so, did Michael Brown win the game or lose it?

The Michael Brown story we were first told, featured a “Gentle Giant” tripping down the street with his best buddy Dorian, all excited about starting college in a couple of dellwood-7days.  Only a “Dumb Nigga” would instinctively believe that story. If I told that story to my pasty-white mom as a teen with the cops at my door, she’d get to the bottom of it in a hurry, rather than launch a national protest over her outrage against the violation of my civil rights. But that’s one of the key features of the “Dumb Nigga’s” thought processes. Anything a fellow “Dumb Nigga” tells you is automatically true–especially if it feeds into the cultural prejudice against “Whitey,” and “white values.”

White values? Oh, you know. Things like walking on the sidewalk instead of down thedellwood-5 middle of the street. Or, not hanging your ass out of your trousers. Or saying, “Yes sir, right away officer,” when a cop tells you to do some simple thing that will keep you alive and out of trouble. White values, like not ripping off the corner store, setting the stolen soda on the sidewalk, waiting for the cops to arrive, and then pulling a big knife and staggering toward them when they tell you to surrender. (Yeah. Mike Brown 2.0 Video to follow…)

The real question you have to ask yourself here is: even given that Darren Wilson and all hqdefault (1)the Ferguson cops might viciously hate all the local black homeboys and are just itching for an excuse to stop and arrest any and all innocent young black males they run into–why would you go out of your way to give them any excuse to act out their aggressions against you? If angry Officer Wilson roars up all pissed off and tells you to get the hell out of the middle of the street, why wouldn’t you just get out of the middle of the street and let him roll on–much less, why would you tax his seething, white racist patience while still holding in your hand the evidence of the strong-arm robbery you’d just committed down the street, on your way to your buddy’s house to hollow out those stolen Swisher Sweets and make some blunts?

Here’s what you’re going to find out eventually about Michael Brown, though if you’re a member of the “black community,” none of it’s going to matter and it’s going to be the cop’s fault however it shakes out:

1 Michael Brown was not a “Gentle Giant.” In a misguided attempt to defend one of their own, the Ferguson cops released a video of Brown tossing around the store clerk he was robbing like a rag doll, just a few minutes before getting himself shot. As the clerk comes back for a second try at apprehending him, Brown towers and looms over him with an arm cocked and by sheer force of menace cows him into retreating. Michael Brown in dellwood-2 is in reality over 6’5″ and pushing 300 lbs. That’s also not just a lot of fat.

2 Michael Brown was not just walking home to grandma’s house, down the middle of the street. Or to Dorian’s house, depending on who’s telling which story in what interview. Michael Brown had just robbed by force the Quick Trip and was still in the company of his partner in crime, the “black community’s” main witness, who has already been convicted of lying to the police. (Incidentally, they stole a case of Swisher Sweets, notoriously bad cigars that exist only to hollow out, and fill with dope.)

3 Michael Brown’s step-father is a convicted felon and though Brown himself is alleged never been convicted of a “serious felony,” there a lot of felonies out there to commit and it all depends upon what you call “serious.” He’s protected for the moment by his juvenile records’ legal status from the 1408555296718_wps_23_An_18_year_old_Missouri_mprying eyes of fact-finders. Apparently Brown’s step-dad plead out a deal to get Michael absolved of involvement in a 2ndblunt-54540 degree murder rap, but that’s not my point: If you claim Michael Brown is a furry widdle wabbit who’d never hurt a fly, and I point out a video of him thugging-it out with a clerk while robbing a quickie-mart, or photos of him stoned silly and partying with gangbangers and jailbirds, that’s not character assassination. That’s a direct response to the challenge of your own propaganda.

Every mom with a dead kid wants a fantasy angel to take to the funeral and cry over in a big public show of grief and mourning. But you don’t get that luxury when the whole “black community” is burning down the Quick Trip and you’re in the nation’s face trying to lynch a white cop for allegedly assassinating your innocent little black baby boy. You can hardly blame some Ferguson cop 2014_08_12-06_39-tellmenow-53ea5f7e92449-600x600in the video evidence department for wanting to expose the hoax. And make no mistake about it, Michael Brown was no stranger to the “Dumb Niggas” who torched the store and financially ruined the clerk and owner who they, in true “Dumb Nigga” logic, blame for not just his death, but the “defamation” of his memory.

I may sound like a stuck loop here, but all Michael Brown had to do to stay alive was not walk down the middle of the street and stay on the sidewalk like a normal human being. (Oh yes, I know you young “Niggas” and “Wiggas” out there think that’s being “white,” and acting “white” isn’t cool…) And if you’re going to  walk down the middle of the street, don’t do it wimagesith an armload of stolen cigars. And let alone, when some cop inevitably rolls up on you as you are walking down the middle of the street, carrying an armload of stolen cigars, and all he does is curse you and order you onto the sidewalk, don’t tell him you’ll get to it in your own sweet time.

But, that’s not how “Dumb Nigga” thinks. “Nigga” would rather be dead than not cool. I can only come to the conclusion that in the “black community,” this is an ethos not entirely restricted to “Dumb Niggas.” It appears to be an almost universally endorsed, almost beloved, “black community” cultural imperative.

I’m just thinking out loud here… From the perspective of a plain dumb white guy, it seems to me that Michael Brown would be alive and enjoying his jail time today if he’d done nothing more than stay on theYoung-Gorillaz sidewalk on his way home from robbing the local convenience store. All we plain dumb white guys can only smile, and think: Seriously. How stupid do you need to be not to see that much? It’s hard to say if Darren Wilson got trigger happy in the heat of the moment or not. Sure, all of that’s debatable. But Mike Brown set out that day looking for trouble, and he found it. Or it found him. That shouldn’t have to be argued. But Dumb Niggas” will never see it that way. So “Dumb Niggas” will just have to keep getting shot I suppose.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/09/breaking-mike-brown-pictured-partying-with-step-dad-felon-louis-head-on-instagram/

Michael Brown’s cousin Eric Davies said this about Mike:

You know a couple of weeks ago he told me, “One day everybody in the world is going to know my name.”

‘Isn’t that the craziest thing? He was so sure, “Everybody in the world is going to know my name.”

‘Turns out it was like a prophecy. Now they do.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2730153/A-kid-broken-home-beat-odds-to-college-A-rapper-sang-smoking-weed-feds-A-violent-robbery-suspect-caught-shocking-video-just-real-Michael-Brown.html#ixzz3GMhfZFQU
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Sadly, there is no video of Michael Brown’s death. But if there was,it would probably look a lot like this:

Mike Brown 2.0

 

Another “black community” hero is born. Fight the power brother! RIP Mike Brown. And whoever the hell this “Crazy-ass Nigga” is. The only difference between this sad fool’s ending and that of Michael Brown, is that Mike Brown had a better publicity team.

Posted in That "Race" Thang | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Do the Wrong Thing Part One

images (9)So where’s Trayvon Martin and his posse now? Unfortunately, the only one of that crew we can account for is poor Trayvon himself. The rest of them took the money and ran with it.

Where’d they run?

Well, off to capitalize on the next big exploitable “thing” to continue fostering the very profitable narrative that declares the perpetual helplessness of the “black community” to overcome “white privilege” in all its forms, whether subtle, brutally real, ephemeral, imaginary, or completely intangible.images (3)

I’m sure most of you out there think you know all about the death of Trayvon Martin. You think you know the evidence, the witnesses, and all the key players. But I’m betting you don’t. So, before I move on to more current events, let’s just review: Where are Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin today? Hustling a book to press hoping to take advantage of the fun and games in Fergusson Missouri. And then, they, like me, are probably already moving their operations to St. Louis, where another white officer just emptied the magazine of his Glock into an 18-year-old black kid, who’s friends and family claim was only holding a sandwich. The cops of course claim he was armed, and fired at the cop first. We’ll just have see how that plays out. The local “black community” however, isn’t content to wait. They’ve got to rush and get all BzgKiGQIgAAniedthe Jimmy Johns or Subway sandwich props up and running for the cameras here pretty quick. That’ll make a nice visual: “Don’t taze me bro…” bang, bang, bang, (seventeen times) and the sandwiches all fall to the ground as the protesters collapse in a heap for the news crew.

And then loot and burn down the nearest sandwich shop.

“An investigation will decide if the officer’s behavior was appropriate,” he said.

Asked about police claims that there was evidence the young man fired three shots and recovered a 9mm weapon at the scene, Syreeta Myers said, “Police lie. They lied about Michael Brown, too.”

Michael Brown was the unarmed black 18-year-old who was killed on Aug. 9 by a white police officer in nearby Ferguson. Brown’s killing was very much on the minds of protesters who gathered after Wednesday’s shooting, with some shouting “Hands up, don’t shoot” – a common refrain during the weeks of sometimes violent protests in Ferguson.

A state grand jury is deciding if the Ferguson officer, Darren Wilson, will face charges. He has not been seen in public since the Aug. 9 shooting.images (59)

Dotson said that the man killed Wednesday night was “no stranger to law enforcement,” including since he had turned 18.

Online court documents show that Vonderrit Myers was charged in June in St. Louis with the unlawful use of a weapon, a felony, and misdemeanor resisting arrest. A hearing that had been scheduled for Monday was continued until Nov. 17.

The police chief said some in the crowd Wednesday night shouted obscenities at officers and damaged police cars, but that the officers “showed great restraint.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/st-louis-police-shooting-prompts-dead-suspects-mom-to-speak-out/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/09/us/st-louis-officer-shooting/

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-09/black-teen-shot-17-times-killed-white-cop-just-miles-away-first-ferguson-shooting

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-st-louis-police-fatally-shoot-man-20141008-story.html

I have to give props to Tracy Martin at least, for taking his several fat payoffs quietly,download (39) discretely tucking away whatever regular or ongoing income he’s generating off the death of the son he took from his mother as an infant with apparently little protest from her. Tracy Martin indeed, broke up Trayvon’s home and family with several repeat performances of abandonment with several mistresses and would-be wives. And in spite of all the overt, incontestable images of his multiple adultery and philandering, he’s very credibly been playing the part of faithful husband and father for Sybrina Fulton Incorporated. He’s been generally keeping his mouth shut and out of the nation’s collective face otherwise. Tracy is most notably still connected to one of the lamest social-political pretenses for soliciting money from the self-hating “white,” mostly northern, “liberal” population and it’s currently sympathetic images (2)government. That would be, the attempt to repeal all “Stand Your Ground” laws in the nation. These laws oddly enough, measurably and statistically, benefit “black” defendants far more frequently than “white” defendants, at least in the state of Florida.

Of course, the Trayvon Martin case had nothing whatsoever to do with “Stand Your Ground” laws. Neither those words nor the Florida statute in question were ever referenced in George Zimmerman’s trial as even the vaguest allusion to some sort of possible defense for his shooting of young crumped-up-chargesTrayvon Martin. The charges against George Zimmerman were cooked and seasoned for a year by the greatest Democrat politicians, lawyers, and prosecuting teams in Florida. Benjamin Crump and Daryl Parks, who’s interest in the case just came down to making money off Trayvon’s death in various civil suits, were the only two legal geniuses who still cling to the bare-assed, bold-assertion that Trayvon Martin’s unfortunate termination had anything at all to do with either “race” or “Stand your Ground” laws. The issue of “race” or “racial profiling” was never cited in the case of Florida v George Zimmerman. Even the hand-pickedimages (35) prosecution team, who bypassed the normal Grand Jury process in order to give the Democratic governor and local politicians a sure and immediate show trial, couldn’t make any believable connection to the “racial profiling” allegations of the “black community.” The whole truth was, after the feds started digging and prodding and arm-twisting everyone and everything George Zimmerman ever came in contact with his entire life, what the overtly biased prosecution team came up with, is, instead of a vicious white redneck who hated “Niggas,” Ol’ Georgie turned out to be something of a do-gooder and civil rights advocate who took a black girlfriend to the senior prom.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin

Sybrina Fulton on the other hand, seems determined to groom herself into a major “black community” celebrity–a Sainted Mother and symbol of universal grief and mourning for the young black males allegedly taken by hateful white predators on what one is expected to assume is a daily basis. Or whatever the most current and popular download (7)“black community” cause of the day might be. This of course, in spite of the fact that Sybrina Fulton didn’t raise Trayvon, wasn’t the mommy who trucked him out to ball games and sent him off to school in the morning with a kiss and a bag lunch. At the time of his passing, Sybrina had only been recently re-introduced to Trayvon Martin as a day-to-day responsibility. And this came about only in the wake of Tracy Martin walking out on Alicia Stanley, the lover he had dumped Sybrina for when Trayvon was a child, and then eventually married. Alicia was the woman who actually did raise the boy, the woman Trayvon Martin actually called “mother.” But at the time of Trayon’s death, his father was once again moving on and taking up with Brandy Green–a married woman who lived in the housing complex where Trayvon met his fate, The Retreat at Twin Lakes. Now, at the time the media was first swarming all over Tracy and Brandy, the latterdownload (2)
was being passed off as his “fiancé.” It was claimed that Trayvon had come to live in his “father’s” house. It was claimed that the candy and Skittles Trayvon had gone to get from the store that night, was for his “little brother” who we were led to believe was at home waiting with excitement for them, waiting during halftime at a championship game for his return, apparently along with his “parents,” or however you would characterize the Martin/Green relationship. (We would eventually were told by the prosecution’s “star” witness, Rachael Jeantel, that Trayvon Martin’s biggest cause for concern with George Zimmerman that night, was that he was a predatory man-rapist who would follow him home and also attack his “little brother.”)

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/05/trayvon_martins_final_hour.html

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/what_the_media_choose_not_to_know_about_trayvon.html

The truth was, Brandy Green was married to someone else and it was her house that Trayvon was visiting. Trayvon’s mystery “little brother” wasn’t related to him at all. He was actually first introduced as Chad Green, the son of Brandy Green and the spawn of a mysterious man she was by all reckoning still married to. This man has given several interviews with the media, but I don’t find his name divulged online, except for here:

http://www.re-newsit.com/2013/07/chad-josephs-dad-is-witness-in-murder.html

Here his name is given as Chester Joseph, and his son, the “little brother” of Trayvon Martin ischester joseph referred to as “Chad Joseph.” (Chad the younger was also labeled “Chad Joseph” in the Zimmerman hearings.) You figure it out. And the whole truth is, Tracy Martin has a few more baby-mommas floating around out there that have never been explored by the “media,” and likewise, Tracy Martin has a few other loosely defined “children,” covering a wide spread of ages, spanning his multi-partnered reproductive years to date.  (Ah yes, I am the paterfamilias. I have spread my seed…) But you get the point. It’s not a clean and clear picture of these key players we have been given by the “black community” and its media sycophants in the Trayvon Martin drama. Not from the very beginning. The pretended solidity of Trayvon Martin’s entire family relationship is a hoax devised to cover up an outright familial farce.

Tracy Martin didn’t live anywhere near where Trayvon was killed. Tracy Martin didn’t live at Retreat at Twin Lakes at all. Tracy Martin and his son were both complete strangers to that community. Tracy had only very recently started shacking up with Brandy Green, and then, mostly just on weekends. He would drive up from where he actually worked and lived in Miami—as did Trayvon. That’s 245 miles, roughly 3hrs and 45 minutes away from either Trayvon Martin or Tracy Martin’s “neighborhood.” This change in Tracy’s weekend lodging routine, again,  came about apparently rather suddenly, when he just flat-out dumped download (1)Alicia with no warning or excuses. In the wake of his father’s fickle female partner trade, Trayvon was first bounced back to Sybrina, who couldn’t handle him, and then she bounced him back to Tracy at Brandy’s place because Trayvon had been suspended from school for the third time, and Sybrina had given up on trying to handle his anti-social behaviors. Tracy was indeed, at the time of Trayvon’s untimely demise, not at all “engaged” to Brandy Green, Chad was not his son nor Trayvon’s “little brother,” Chad was a 14-year-old young adult born of Brandy Green, who was apparently still legally Brandy Joseph, still married to Chester Joseph, while serving as the mistress of Trayvon’s father—who by best available accounts was actually still married to Alicia Stanley-Martin.

 

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/06/16/chad-greens-dad-talks-then-chad-and-brandy-green-talk/

Brief though her contribution to the rationalization of the “black community’s” cultural myth that came to be known as “Justice for Trayvon” may have been, it was Brandydownload (54) Green who first put out the initial Big Lie that Trayvon Martin had come back from the candy store and was sitting on his front stoop. It was there, on “his daddy’s porch,” that she, and subsequent storytellers over the first month and more of the media circus that followed, would embellish the slim “facts” actually known, into a fearsome story of white racism, where Trayvon Martin, shown only to the public as a cute little tyke, was assaulted by the heinous White Supremist, George Zimmerman, who came up out of nowhere, for no reason, while the boy was minding his own business in his own neighborhood, and shot him down like a dog on his own porch, just for being out of place in a “gated, white community.”

 

Later that public scenario was modified somewhat, because Zimmerman turned out not to be “white,” and his “gated community” was highly multi-racial, and because of the then images (41)clandestine input to the Fulton/Martin team of Trayvon’s friend Rachel Jeantel—who eventually came forward and claimed to have been on the phone with him at the time. The Fulton/Martin team, unsatisfied with the level of local attention, soon stepped their ever-more heinous charges up the media chain nationally, and soon began to claim that George Zimmerman sybrina-fulton-trayvon-martinhad actually hunted Trayvon down, tracking him home from the store, candy in his pocket. They incorporated the emerging sketchy witness interviews and 911 audio to “prove” to the public that Zimmerman hunted Trayvon down, pounced on him, and Trayvon died screaming for help and begging for his life, as George held him captive. Privately, for the Fulton/Martin crew, after a little coaching and grooming, Rachel Jeantel seemed perfectly credible and cooperative in supporting the notion that George Zimmerman actually chased Trayvon Martin to “his daddy’s porch” and there, mere feet away from freedom, grabbed hold of “little Trayvon” and shot the alleged toddler down like an animal. That’s the story the “black community” wanted to tell. That’s what they wanted to believe, and they were going to make the story come out that way whatever they had to do to make it plausible. And you have to keep in mind that when Crump and Parks came onboard, they weren’t criminal lawyers. Nothing they had to offer about the Zimmerman trial had any insight or authority at all in a criminal case. They were, and are, ambulance chasimages (34)ers. Their whole reason for involvement in the first place was to initiate a civil suit and shake-down the Retreat at Twin Lakes Homeowner’s Association for 2-3 million dollars. In that, their main task, they won their case handily, and quickly moved on to other forms of profiteering from Trayvon’s death, and the combined grief of the “black community.”

But of course, Rachel Jeantel’s testimony didn’t hold up very well in front of a courtroom images (50)full of jurists who didn’t necessarily feel the same compulsion to validate the “black experience.” In fact, none of the principles falling on the Fulton/Martin side of the argument over the circumstances of Trayvon’s death, were willing to be totally honest even about the most basic, obvious facts of the case. Tracy Martin first blush attempted to pretend that he was right on the scene, and saw Trayvon just outside that night, that he knew he’d come back from the store and was right around the yard somewhere. But of course, the facts and evidence proved that Trayvon Martin had never come back home at all, never even attempted to come home, never even came close to his “daddy’s” house, had been wandering around for almost an hour in the unfamiliar complex, shooting the breeze with friend Rachael Jeantel, making fun of George Zimmerman as a “Creepy-Ass Cracker,” and a probable gay rapist.images (31)

Even the raw math of the incident’s timing betrays the “black community” storyline. Time stamps from video at the convenience store prove that Trayvon Martin had been wandering around the neighborhood for about an hour—the trip to the store and back would have only taken ten or fifteen minutes at a lazy stroll. Trayvon Martin was definitely not simply walking back from the store with Skittles and ice tea. (He most probably had Arizona Fruit Punch or Watermelon in truth, and there’s a whole lot of not-so-speculative exploration of what he was probably actually doing that night at the link below.)

Four minutes elapsed between the time George Martin lost sight of Trayvon Martin, claiming Trayvon had bolted off out of sight. This was verified via time stamps on Zimmerman’s 911 tapes, and supported by the testimony of “star witness” Rachael Jeantel and her phone records. Trayvon Martin was killed roughly a hundred yards away from his much-touted goal. His easily documented travels took him clearly in the opposite direction from “his daddy’s porch,” and around a corner behind some large buildings, in a dark area no more than 30 yards from where Zimmerman had started his observations, close to his parked vehicle. Trayvon Martin, had he really been afraid, could have easily made it “home” with time to spare. Instead, Trayvon Martin clearly turned around and met back up with George Zimmerman at an intersection far away from Brandy Green’s front porch, and right near George Zimmerman’s truck.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/what_the_media_choose_not_to_know_about_trayvon.html

The New York Times and Reuters and a multitude of other reliable news sources report that Brandy Green and Tracy Martin were actually out to dinner all evening and left the two boys to watch the game alone, leaving them with money for pizza. (Meaning, Trayvon, Martin, 17, and Chad Green/Joseph, 14,) They came back late and in reality didn’t notice Trayvon was missing until late the next morning. So, in short: Brandy Green was just flat-out lying about seeing Trayvon sitting on the porch that night. So was Tracy Martin. They were just making up a story on the spur of the moment, flying by the seat of their pants, to cover their own asses for leaving two teenagers unattended all night.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/02/us/trayvon-martin-shooting-prompts-a-review-of-ideals.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

So, what happened to Brandy Green? It’s clear that Brandy Brandy Green almost instantly got “disappeared.” It has been a swift and certain and very thorough “disappearing” to this day. That cleaned up some of thebrandy Crump/Parks/Fulton/Martin  storyline. Then Tracy got groomed. And muzzled. Before Sybrina’s legal team swooped in, Tracy had already stumbled over several early faux pas that Crump and Park found damaging to the narrative, statements Tracy had to massage throughout the case. Tracy Martin for instance, gave national media downloadinterviews where he admitted he told the police he had doubts about whether or not the infamous “cries for help from a little boy” 911 recording sounded like his son. The police testified that he’d dismissed the tape as not being his son very clearly. The best Tracy could do on the stand is deny denying it, claiming that all he’d said was that he wasn’t sure it was his son. (Not very helpful there at all.)

As for poor Alicia Stanley-Martin , well to Ben Crump and Daryl Parks, it must have been obvious that you can’t sell books and interviews andsybrinatracytshirts tickets, much less win a trial, if Sybrina Fulton comes off like a disaffected mom who never even knew her own kid, and Tracy Martin is exposed to be a multiply-adulterous, home wrecking father and philandering husband. Alicia Stanley complicated things. Alicia Stanley wasn’t even allowed to sit with the family by the casket—not even in the front row–at her own son’s funeral because it didn’t fit the Crump/Parks narrative. It was awkward. It confused the public and muddied up the Fulton/Martin image on camera. The “black community” as a whole really really didn’t like her very existence messing with the “Justice for Trayvon” mythology they’d finally got all worked out for themselves.

But don’t take my word for it:

 

The two key elements in @Tjsotomaor”s arguments are first, a total lack of any “facts” at all. In fact, his “facts” are pretty much ass-backwards. And the second element in this analyst’s “black community” macho-male, misogynist-based manifesto, is that the facts, even if he had them straight, wouldn’t matter. The fact that Tracy Martin was still married to Alicia Stanley would not make one bit of difference to this “authentically” black YouTube genius at all–nor would the fact that Alicia Stanley had been Trayvon’s mom from age 3 till just before he passed away at 17. Thisalicia_martin_trayvonmartins_stepmother “black” man’s point is simply this: Tracy Martin finished with Alicia Stanley. Five minutes ago, five years ago, didn’t matter. However many years they spent together, who she had become to his son all that time, didn’t matter. The moment Tracy Martin got bored with, and walked away from her, that bitch was irrelevant.

“You got to sit in where you fit in,” is what the Fulton/Martin Corporation told Alicia Stanley–Martin at Trayvon’s funeral, meaning, yeah, you can come, but plant your ass back with the masses wherever you can find a seat. No doubt Tracy Martin felt that way, having just walked out on her. If he didn’t, you know Sybrina did, since obviously she was the woman Tracy had dumped Sybrina for. The question that should be asked however, is: How did Trayvon feel about that? The “black community” and certainly the Fulton/Martin coalition obviously didn’t give a damn.

And finally, from her secret hiding place, came the  “damning” testimony of the “star witness,” for the prosecution, Rachael Jeantel. Finally the much-touted, “friend” of Trayvon Martin who was going to explain it all appeared from the mist of the Fulton/Martin machine’s hyperbole, and graced the American legal system with her presence. Parks and Crump and the brilliant special prosecution team kept her utterly hidden in the background images (51)for almost a year, as “witness 8.” She was revealed at last to be that much-alluded to, but entirely mysterious “friend” Trayvon Martin was supposedly talking to on the phone at the time of his death. Ultimately, it proved that she probably hadn’t actually heard Martin’s last moments. Trayvon hung up or otherwise lost connection, just as the interesting part of his encounter with Zimmerman began. She had been promoted to be the “smoking gun,” proving once and for all the multiple race-based motivations and callous, bigoted, violent and foolhardy actions of the intrepid “white Hispanic”murdering racist, George Zimmerman. She was alleged to be a veritable “school bus full of nuns” who had heard and seen the whole thing. Instead, due to her performance on the stand, she was universally viewed as a hostile, unreliable, inarticulate Neanderthal. Her several, ever-morphing versions of events came off as unclear at best:

Martin’s friend was subsequently interviewed by state prosecutors on April 2, 2012. During her interview with the prosecutor, Martin’s friend recounted her last phone call with Martin and added that Martin had described the man as “crazy and creepy”, watching him from a vehicle while the man was talking on the phone.[136] She also testified that Martin referred to Zimmerman as a “creepy ass cracker” and “nigga” during their telephone conversation.[145][146] On March 6, 2013, prosecutors admitted that she had lied under oath, when she falsely testified that she had been in the hospital on the day of Martin’s funeral. She later admitted beingimages (30) embarrassed about lying and that she felt guilty about Martin’s death and not doing more to help.[147][148][149] Crump had refused to disclose the identity of Witness 8, stating that she was only 16, a minor at the time of the shooting, and asked the media to respect her privacy.[150] It was subsequently revealed that she was actually 18 at the time when she said she was on the phone with Martin.[151] According to the defense, her actual age had been edited out of previously released disclosures.[152] Crump has denied intentionally giving any misleading statements about her age.[153] Witness 8 was subsequently identified as Rachel Jeantel, a friend with whom Martin had attended elementary school and high school.[154]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2012/12/4/204045/932/crimenews/State-Releases-New-George-Zimmerman-Discovery

Jeantel’s testimony, which continues as I write, contradicts Zimmerman’s claim that he stopped following Martin and was assaulted by him without provocation. Her account implies that it was Zimmerman who tackled Martin, rather than the other way around. How credible is her version of events? Not very.

That bit about “the sound of wet grass” seems like an after-the-fact embellishment; I am not sure what wet grass sounds like, and it is unlikely that Jeantel knew her friend was in the vicinity of it until she read or heard accounts of the shooting long after her conversation with him. Her claimdownload (18) that she “kind of heard Trayvon saying, ‘get off, get off'” also smacks of twisting her memory to fit the prosecution’s case. As defense attorney Don West showed in his cross-examination, Jeantel’s testimony has evolved over time in ways that help the prosecution.

In the courtroom, Jeantel confidently identified the person screaming in the background of a recorded 911 call as Martin. But as West pointed out, she was much less certain about that in a deposition, saying the voice “could be Trayvon,” adding, “Like I said, I don’t know. But it could be. The dude sound kinda like Trayvon.” In an interview with prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda, Jeantel said she “heard a noise like something hitting somebody”—a detail she had not mentioned before. Today in court she declared that the sound meant “Trayvon got hit.” West pointed out that she was merely download (24)speculating, since there was no way she could know that based merely on what she heard over the phone. Jeantel initially told prosecutors that the “noise like something hitting somebody” was the last thing she heard. Later she claimed to have heard someone say “get off, get off” after the “noise like something hitting somebody.” Yesterday in court, she mentioned the “sound of wet grass.” Today she said it was the sound of people rolling around on the ground.

http://reason.com/blog/2013/06/27/key-witness-against-george-zimmerman-is

Simply put: the “black community” with the help of a willing and enthusiastic white, liberal media, and in many cases a Democratic-led liberal legal and political structure, has long ago concocted and canonized a fable, a cultural fairy-tale, a narrative it wants to hear about download (44)“race” in America. And that’s simply what it’s going to hear. The Trayvon Martin case is one convoluted lie or half-truth after another, most of it pointless deflection intended to distract from a lot of personal disorder and scandal. And when you sort it all out you come to Trayvon Martin, a pretty good ass-kicker, who found himself in the dark and wet one night, wandering around a strange neighborhood in the rain, BSing with his girlfriend on the phone, coming into some kind of confrontation with the neighborhood watch captain who thought it was odd he was out there weaving around the housing complex that night. The encounter evolves quickly into Trayvon having a “Nigga Moment” on top of George Zimmerman’s face. After a while, Zimmerman decides he’s a goner and shoots Trayvon once in the chest. It’s a clean and efficient kill.

That’s all we really know about it. That’s all we will ever really know about it. No racial profiling. No racist redneck killer, no bloodthirsty “white” man stalking the night for little black baby boys to murder. No assault on the “hoodie” as a fashion or cultural statement. No “Stand your Ground.” No “racial profiling.” Just a swift and sure cessation of a potentially deadly assault. And you and Rachel Jeantel can postulate all you want that Trayvon would have never killed George Zimmerman, but it’s not incumbent upon George, in the midst of being beaten helpless and unconscious, to second guess where Trayvon’s Martin’s head is at the moment, or if he really has the experience and professionalism to lay down a safe and non-lethal “Ass Whoopin’,” or if he’s just going to keep hammering away after his Ass-Whoop-ee passes out—legally or morally.

Now, I can face down the “black community” with this sort of logic and evidence, and argue away all the other facts, get images (57)concession after concession, admission that the whole original story was a load of crap. But…but..and yes, there always comes a “but”…uh…Zimmerman should have stayed in his car. The police told him to stay in his car. Or, but…Trayvon had just as much right to “Stand his Ground.” Well, no: A, no, the “police” never talked to George, a 911 dispatcher talked to George. He was not “ordered” to stay in his car, he was told the police didn’t need him to follow Trayvon. George agreed, and evidence suggests that though he eventually got out to see if he could regain sight of Martin, he wasn’t actually “following” him anywhere, much less chasing him down—in fact Martin had doubled-back and cut George’s exploration off fairly close to his images (77)vehicle. “Following” isn’t illegal in any case. And B, no, it doesn’t matter who said what to who or who threw the first punch or made the first grab or how long it took Trayvon Martin to get on top of George Zimmerman, pin him down, and wail the tar out of him for an extended period of time. A minute or two of having the crap beaten out of you seems like an eternity when you’re on the receiving end of it.  If at any time during Trayvon Martin’s enthusiastic “Ass Whoopin’” as Rachel Jeantel described it for CNN, George Zimmerman felt he was in fear of death or serious injury, he had every right to shoot Trayvon Martin to prevent it. That’s simple self-defense, and has nothing to do with “Stand your Ground.” That’s the law in every state of the union regarding legally-carrying handgun owners. There is no law that says: if the other guy is younger than you, or if theimages (84) other guy doesn’t have a gun, you have to take the ass-whooping like a man and hope you don’t get killed in the process.

At this point, Hill attempts to draw her out more fully… At some point a fight breaks out, who swings–who hits who first in your mind?” Jeantel replies “In my mind, I believe Trayvon. It was Trayvon…”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Ug-6o4jSizE

Hill refocuses with another question “If Trayvon swung first, what do you think Zimmerman did to make him swing first?” Jeantel replies “I believe Zimmerman was a wannabe cop trying to say ‘Oh, I got you.'” Hill then brings up a theory which has been discussed by some in the media since the verdict “Do you think he pulled his gun out?” Jeantel replies “No, I believe he tryin’ to grab him. ‘Okay, I got you, you coming with me.'”

So it appears Jeantel’s view is that Zimmerman put his hands on Martin and then Martin responded by throwing a punch. However in testimony at trial Jeantel never claimed to have heard anyone saying “Okay, I got you.” She testified that Martin initiated the confrontation by asking Zimmerman “What you following me for?” Zimmerman responded “What are you doing around here?” At this point she says she heard a bump andtrayvon-martin_george-zimmerman_cartoon faintly heard Martin say “get off.”

 

Zimmerman’s account was that Martin approached him and asked “You got a problem, motherf–ker?” Zimmerman says he backed up, reached for his phone and replied “I don’t have a problem.” At this point he claims Martin said “You got a problem now” and punched him in the nose. Is it true? Obviously only Zimmerman knows for certain, but his account does escalate with a certain logic. The words and actions of his account don’t have any obvious gaps that need to be filled in to explain how one thing led to another.

The other interesting part of Jeantel’s interview is her claim, also made on Piers Morgan Tuesday night, that Zimmerman should have taken his beating. Hill pointed out “George Zimmerman’s defenders would say well, if gangsta_money-12600he didn’t pull out a gun, if Trayvon was whoopin’ his ass he could have killed George Zimmerman.” Jeantel replies “No. Trust me. That’s not killing. You have a big bruise, you don’t see inside your skin. You might have a little stitches.” Jeantel adds “He [Trayvon] would have fight him and run.”

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/07/17/Rachel-Jeantel-Says-Martin-Threw-the-First-Punch

http://jobs.aol.com/videos/job-search/jeantel-zimmerman-a-wannabe-cop-who-shouldve-taken-his-ass-w/517860107/

Unfortunately, even if you argue the “black community” down to their last desperate nuggets of rationale for the complete excusing of poor little Trayvon for having any part of his own demise, it’s always going to be: George Zimmerman was a grown man, he had the gun. Trayvon Martin was an unarmed teenager. They that with a straight face, as if it makes sense. At that point I can only suggest that if allimages (76)
unarmed young black teenagers assumed that every “Creepy Ass Cracker” probably had a gun on him, there might be fewer dead young black male teenagers. I mean, Trayvon didn’t know George Zimmerman had a gun on him. But he didn’t know he didn’t. He certainly should have known that Zimmerman could have. The one thing Trayvon Martin knew for sure, was that Trayvon Martin didn’t have a gun on him. But of course, that presumes young black males don’t frequently carry guns themselves—which we all know is nonsense. And it also presupposes that Trayvon Martin was harmless without a gun, which we all know is comically naïve. The pretense that the Trayvon Martins of the world are principally at risk because of “Creepy Ass Crackers” is even more inane. If he hadn’t decided to stove George Zimmerman’s his head into the sidewalk, Trayvon Martin would have been ultimately in far more danger from his little thug-wannabe buddies than he ever was from some neighborhood watch volunteer, with or without a gun in the possession of the latter.

Look familiar?:

images (61)

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/crimelaw/features/n_7836/

No it’s not Trayvon Martin. It’s not Barack Obama’s unborn son who would have looked just like Trayvon Martin. In fact, Barry kdk as he was known then, would have only been six years older than this unarmend, young black male at the time he became famous. Barry would have been smoking dope in the dorm and talking about the coming revolution with possible future victims of this young black man and his fellow victims of “white privilege.” It’s Matias Reyes, who in 1989 raped and beat nearly to death the once highly publicized “Central Park Jogger.” Unfortunately, Matias got away, but five other young black men were convicted of the crime based upon their “wilding” behavior elsewhere and with other victims of assault in the park that night, lots of witnesses, their vicinity to the scene at the time of the crime, and rather a lot of other sound evidence, contrary to what Al Sharpton and company are now claiming. images (60)And sure, the “black community” screamed “racism” because the jogger was a pretty white woman, and the “racist white power structure” obviously wanted to fit up a gang of young black boys because racists think the main goal of every black man is to rape and defile white women. The problem with that bit of sarcasm, is that young black males have actually been known to rape and defile black women for fun and sport—sometimes in wolf packs.

download (35)The “Central Park Five” were eventually exonerated for the rape. Yes, the state may have gotten the verdict wrong. On that crime anyway. But then, all five of these youth had indeed been identified and convicted of being part of the “Wolf Pack,” a signature group of Central Park thugs who all-but invented “wilding.” All five of these youth had also given confessions to the police—which they later claimed were coerced. And that wasn’t the only evidence against them:

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio is demanding a quick settlement of the lawsuit brought by the five men convicted of one of the most sickening crimes in the city’s history: the attack on the Central Park jogger in 1989. The plaintiffs are demanding $50 million apiece…

The “Central Park Five,” as PBS documentarian Ken Burns has dubbed them, aren’t exactly Emmett Till (as Burns would have you believe). Even if they were innocent of the Central Park rape, which they aren’t, the reason they were originally arrested was that they were rampaging through the cp5-4-lgpark, assaulting people.

Even after they began denying the rape, the defendants continued to admit committing these other attacks…

All those convictions — on the rape as well as the assaults — have been vacated because an aging district attorney wanted a glowing obituary in The New York Times.

The D.A.’s report was based solely on the confession of Matias Reyes, career criminal, serial rapist and murderer. Reyes had absolutely nothing to lose by confessing to the rape — the statute of limitations had run — and much to gain by claiming he acted alone: He got a favorable prison transfer and the admiration of his fellow inmates for smearing the police.

New York journalist Nicholas Stix reports that one inmate says Reyes told him he heard the jogger’s screams and raped her only after the “Central Park Five” had finished with her.

The media proclaim those five rapists innocent based on their own over-excited reports that the DNA found on the jogger matched that of Reyes, but none of the others!

Yeah, we knew that. It was always known that semen on the jogger did not match any of the defendants. (“DNA Expert: No Semen Links to Defendants,” The Associated Press, July 14, 1990.)download (36)

Prosecutor Elizabeth Lederer expressly reminded the jurors of the missing rapist in her summation to the jury: “Others who were not caught raped her and got away.” Now we know who “got away.”

DNA wasn’t the evidence that convicted the “Central Park Five.” It’s hard to believe now, but in 1989 DNA was rarely used to convict anyone, so it wouldn’t have been carefully collected by police investigators. DNA identifications had only been invented a few years earlier and were not even permitted in New York courts until six months before the Central Park wilding.

This case was solved with old-fashioned police work. After the first 911 calls came in, the police arrested some of the thugs in the park that very night. Then they arrested those named as part of the wolf pack by the first detainees.

For example, one boy picked up in the park told the cops — without prompting — “I know who did the murder. I know who did the murder. I know where he lives and I’ll tell you his name.” He named one of the fivedownload (32) convicted of the attack on the jogger, Antron McCray. (The night of the attack, no one expected the jogger to live.)

Of more than three dozen hoodlums brought in for questioning, only 10 were charged with any crimes, and only five of those were charged with raping the jogger. All those charged with the jogger’s rape gave detailed, corroborated, videotaped confessions, after full Miranda warnings, four of the five in the presence of an adult relative.

Recall that none of them — including the police — could have known whether the jogger would emerge from her coma and be able to identify her attackers. (She emerged, but blocked all memory of the attack.) All five confessed to assisting the attack on the jogger, but none to raping her themselves. That’s enough for a rape conviction.

In Antron McCray’s 34-minute videotaped statement, for example, he said:

“Everybody started hitting her and stuff. She was on the ground,images (67) everybody stompin’ and everything. … I grabbed one arm, some other kid grabbed one arm and we grabbed her legs and stuff. Then we all took turns getting on her, getting on top of her. … I just like, my penis wasn’t in her. I didn’t do nothing to her … I was just doing it so everybody … Everybody would just like, would know I did it.”

Melody Jackson, whose brother was friends with defendant Kharey Wise, testified — reluctantly — that she talked to Wise by phone when he was at Rikers Island and that he told her that he didn’t rape the jogger, he “only held her legs down while Kevin (Richardson) f–ked her.” She originally volunteered this information to the police thinking it would be helpful to Wise.

(The District Attorney’s report that recommended vacating the sentences described the above exchange as: “Wise replied that he had not had sex with her, but had only held and fondled the victim’s leg.”)

images (66)Other witnesses provided various corroborating details to the police, such as one who said Kevin Richardson told him, “We just raped somebody,” and another who heard Raymond Santana and another boy laughing about how “we made a woman bleed.”

Two witnesses independently told police they saw several of the defendants walking from the 102nd Street traverse area where the jogger was raped. One said he realized the significance of that fact only when he saw where the memorial to the jogger in the park was.

When Raymond Santana was being driven to the precinct the night of the wilding, he blurted out: “I had nothing to do with the rape. All I did was feel the woman’s tits.” Wait! Who said anything about rape? The cops had not asked him about any rape.

Two of the defendants, Santana and Richardson, independently brought investigators to the precise location of the attack on the jogger, something only the perpetrators could have done.
download (38)The evidence against Richardson also included his vivid description of the attack — given on videotape, in the presence of his father — and a deep scratch wound on his cheek that he admitted was from the jogger. Oh, also — the crotch of the underwear from the night of the attack was stained with semen, grass, dirt and debris.

Contrary to media reports, there was hair, blood or semen on all five of the defendants.

In the opposite of a rush to judgment, two multi-ethnic juries deliberated for 10 days and 11 days, respectively, before convicting the five defendants of rape or sexual abuse — as well as the other assaults that night, mysteriously vacated by Justice Tejada — and acquitting all but one on the most serious charge, attempted murder.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/ann-coulter/what-the-media-wont-tell-you-about-the-central-park-five/

The stinger for Al Sharpton and his fellow “leaders” in the “black community” was, and will ever remain, that even if innocent of the rape, the Central Park Five were still violent thugs. And if the Matias Reyes confession scenario had actually played out the way he claimed it did, the actual culprit was indeed just another young black male. Matias Reyes wasimages (64) a young, strong and healthy 17, just like little baby Trayvon, when he attacked the pretty young white woman in Central Park, raped and beat and raped and beat her until he supposed he’d finally killed her and left her for dead. Matias Reyes was the same age and build as the “unarmed black youth” we are told by the “black community” didn’t pose any possible threat to anyone.  Trayvon and Matias could have been twin brothers. So, if Barack Obama had a son, he would also look like Matias Reyes. Matias Reyes: A “harmless” and “unarmed” black youngster who by virtue of his youth and lack of weaponry could never represent a danger to anyone.

Right?

No. Not really. In fact, when it comes to “criminal profiling,” Trayvon and Matias are right there in thick of the most violent, dangerous, and most prolific of the criminal classes. And Matias Reyes never “grew up” and had the “come to Jesus” moment apologists for these primary sources of violence in the black and white communities alike keep promising will come with maturity and mentoring. The only reason Matias Reyes finally confessed to nearly raping to death blacks-beating-up-whitesthe Central Park Jogger, the only reason the Central Park Five are free today, is that he volunteered his confession in conjunction with plea-bargaining around a number of other convictions including four other rapes and the murder of a pregnant woman. All the “Central Park Five” were guilty of perhaps, is beating the crap out of random white people in Central Park on a “wilding” spree. And of course, assuming Reyes got to her first, following up Matias’ brutal rapine and thuggery with some playful beating and molestation of their own—you can’t hold that against them. She’d already been “done” anyway and wasn’t long for this world as far as they could tell.

Right?

http://www.conunderground.com/black-mobs-terrorizing-whites-as-planed/

http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2014/09/black-mother-defends-her-sons-role-in.htmlwhites-beat

http://www.dailystormer.com/liberals-claiming-black-violence-is-a-racist-urban-myth/

http://www.gopusa.com/news/2013/07/20/bash-mobs-sweep-through-southern-california/

(WCPO) –CINCINNATI – A man allegedly (“Allegedly”? WTF?) assaulted and robbed by six teens during a “boredom beating” in North College Hill pat-mahaneyhas died. Pat Mahaney, 46, passed away Friday at University of Cincinnati Medical Center a little less than a year after the vicious beating that caused him to suffer internal bleeding and put him in the hospital for four days. Investigators determined the teens instigated the August 2012 attack because they were “bored” and looking for something to do.

North College Hill Police Chief Gary Foust said the juveniles jumped Mahaney from behind, hit him in the head and knocked him to the ground with a six-pack of beer he had just purchased.

http://www.ironicsurrealism.com/2013/07/13/cincinnati-white-victim-of-savage-black-flash-mob-attack-has-died/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024223/Wisconsin-State-Fair-attacks-Philadelphia-Mayor-Michael-Nutter-blasts-racist-flash-mob.html

They may be hundreds of miles away, but two separate cities are dealing with the same problem – race-fuelled attacks that have their citizens in333333333333333 fear.

In Philadelphia, where the phenomenon of racially-motivated ‘flash mobs’ has been rampant for the past two years, Mayor Michael Nutter has had enough.

Tough talk: Philadelphia mayor Michael Nutter says attackers in his city have 'damaged your own race'

Tough talk: Philadelphia mayor Michael Nutter says attackers in his city have ‘damaged your own race’

Targeting the city’s assailants in a speech reported by The Washington Times, Mr Nutter bellowed: ‘You have damaged your own race.

‘Take those God-darn hoodies down, especially in the summer. Pull your pants up and buy a belt ’cause no one wants to see your underwear or the crack of your butt.’

J. Whyatt Mondesire, head of the Philadelphia chapter of the NAACP, called Mr. Nutter’s remarks ‘courageous.’

Mr Mondesire said: ‘These are majority African-American youths and theyimages (98) need to be called on it.’

The mayor has announced he will bolster police patrols and enforce a citywide curfew to crack down on attackers in the streets of the City of Brotherly Love.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024223/Wisconsin-State-Fair-attacks-Philadelphia-Mayor-Michael-Nutter-blasts-racist-flash-mob.html#ixzz3G4nbbIZz
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

http://news4whites.blogspot.com/2014/02/double-hate-crime-mob-attack-videotaped.html

At the Wisconsin State Fair on August 4th, hundreds of black people attacked white people once again.

The alleged attacks are part of a string of “flash mob”-generated violence around the country — including cities like Philadelphia and Chicago — in which packs of dozens or even hundreds of youths appear seemingly out of nowhere to commit assaults, robberies andOLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA other crimes against innocent white bystanders.

At the Iowa State Fair in 2010 scores of black people attacked white people while chanting “Beat Whitey!” The Des Moines law enforcement declined to classify the attacks as hate crimes.images (93)

On July 4th, a mob of black youths attacked, beat, kicked, robbed and stomped on a group of whites watching fireworks in Milwaukee (Source). One black youth claimed, “Oh, white girl bleeds a lot,” after assaulting Shania Perry. Several victims claim the local police downplayed the violence the night of the attacks.

During the 4th of July fireworks display in Peoria, Illinois a mob of blackblack_thugs (1) people began screaming “Kill Whitey” and disrupted traffic by pulling people out of cars and not letting people drive by blocking the highway.The attackers also took fireworks and pointed them at police and firefighters-helping those who were attacked. Many of them, were burned and injured. The mob left black people alone and beat up as many white people they could find. According to eye-witness, the attack was racially motivated, however many local news papers refuse to acknowledge race.

http://american3rdposition.com/?p=3763

The pretense for such independent “wilding” sprees often aren’t even bothered with anyimages (94) more. Major “riots,” often spawn small-gang spinoffs of course, like Freddy’s Fashion Mart, Tawana Brawley, the Duke University Lacrosse team, Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, it’s all the same to them. It doesn’t have to be “real,” it just has to be “perceived” by the “black community” and they feel justified. Or, these days, some random group of young black males could be just plain bored.

And where do they learn that this “wilding” behavior is justified and acceptable? I could waste volumes right now pointing out the race-baiting follies of Al Sharpton alone. But the “black community” and its liberal media apologists have simply decided it doesn’t matter how wrong Al Sharpton turns out to be about anything, nor does it matter who gets burned out, killed, imprisoned, or wastes millions of dollars on a pointless legal defense over what turn out to be blatant lies. Alsharptonjpg-e4e279b57c87fcb5 Sharpton is a “respected” “black community” leader and he gets a pass.

1987: Sharpton spreads the incendiary Tawana Brawley hoax, insisting heatedly that a 15-year-old black girl was abducted, raped, and smeared with feces by a group of white men. He singles out Steve Pagones, a young prosecutor. Pagones is wholly innocent — the crime never occurred — but Sharpton taunts him: “If we’re lying, sue us, so we can . . . prove you images (68)did it.” Pagones does sue, and eventually wins a $345,000 verdict for defamation. To this day, Sharpton refuses to recant his unspeakable slander or to apologize for his role in the odious affair.

1991: A Hasidic Jewish driver in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights section accidentally kills Gavin Cato, a 7-year-old black child, and antisemitic riots erupt. Sharpton races to pour gasoline on the fire. At Gavin’s funeral he images (70)rails against the “diamond merchants” — code for Jews — with “the blood of innocent babies” on their hands. He mobilizes hundreds of demonstrators to march through the Jewish neighborhood, chanting, “No justice, no peace.” A rabbinical student, Yankel Rosenbaum, is surrounded by a mob shouting “Kill the Jews!” and stabbed to death.

1995: When the United House of Prayer, a large black landlord in Harlem, raises the rent on Freddy’s Fashion Mart, Freddy’s white Jewish owner is forced to raise the rent on his subtenant, a black-owned music store. Adownload (33) landlord-tenant dispute ensues; Sharpton uses it to incite racial hatred. “We will not stand by,” he warns malignantly, “and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business.” Sharpton’s National Action Network sets up picket lines; customers going into Freddy’s are spat on and cursed as download (31)“traitors” and “Uncle Toms.” Some protesters shout, “Burn down the Jew store!” and simulate striking a match. “We’re going to see that this cracker suffers,” says Sharpton’s colleague Morris Powell. On Dec. 8, one of the protesters bursts into Freddy’s, shoots four employees point-blank, then sets the store on fire. Seven employees die in the inferno.

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/19/yes-lets-talk-about-al-sharptons-racial-demagoguery-shall-we/

The “black community” never admits its mistakes. That’s because “racism” is “true.” It’s certainly going to be forever “true” to all the workers on the Civil Rights Plantation making money off of stretching the Reconstruction Era to Infinity and Beyond. If there’s no “racism” they’re download (34)all out of a job. Whether it’s really true or not doesn’t matter. It’s emotionally “True.” It “feels” true. That’s all that counts. It’s a culturally-supportive fiction that “might as well be” true. If it’s not true in this case, it’s actually true all the time in every other case. It doesn’t make any difference if they get this images (71)one wrong, just this once, because justice is done overall anyway. The “black community” has a perfect right to habitually riot and protest and extort money and political retribution out of “white people.” Even if it’s based on a lot of facts and assumptions that don’t really apply this time out in this particular instance, “black community” outrage over presumptions of “racism,” is thought by its members to be easily justified out of historical precedent, if for no other reason. And it’s an easy gag to play on “Whitey.” The saddest, most self-defeating, self-damning problem, is that the “black community” feels that even if it isn’t “true” today, even if “racism” is essentially over and done with, it was true for a long time, and “Whitey owes us.”

September 2007 – Minnesota

Anoka – De’Andre June Sr., 47, a black Anoka resident who reported the burning of a cross on his lawn was charged with setting the blaze himself in a search for sympathy and money. Police began to suspect after learning that he had told inmates at the Anoka County jail last week that he was going to burn a cross in his yard and blame it on his neighbor. An inmate KKK 2told police that June had “talked about getting sympathy and money from the public with a cross burning since he was a black man.”


September 2007 – Pennsylvania

Bellafonte – On June 5, 2006, Police found the body of Langston Carraway, a 26 year old Black student at Penn State. He had been stabbed 93 times. Next to his body, “Die Nigger” had been smeared with his blood. This was thought to be a hate crime. Eventually, police found this hate crime had been staged and came to suspect LaVon Chisley, a Black former Penn State football player. He is currently on trial.


USA – Maryland

Waldorf – On Aug. 24, several black residents of Waldorf found their cars 960x540and mailbox spray painted with “KKK” and “Gay Pride”. This was labeled a hate crime. It turned out the Charles County Sheriff’s Office arrested 4 teenagers. Three of them are black, the fourth is white.


April 2007 – Maryland – Waldorf - “White Power,” “K-K-K” and gang related signs were found at Doctor Gustavus Brown Elementary School. This was labeled a hate crime. It turned out the people who wrote the racist graffiti were 14 year old kids, all from all from interracial families and representing diverse racial backgrounds including black, white, Hispanic and Asian.


March 2007 – Delaware – James E. Cooke Jr., a metis, was found guilty today on all counts in his capital murder trial. Cooke broke into LindseyA-member-of-the-American-0101 Bonistall’s Towne Court apartment on May 1, 2005, then raped and strangled her before placing her body in a bathtub and setting the apartment on fire. Cooke, who is black, used a blue marker to write “KKK,” “White Power” and other phrases on the walls, police said. Bonistall was white.


March 2007 – California – Anderson – At Anderson High School, Maintenance employees found several sheets of paper with KKK and Swastika written on them. Police was called and the incident was labeled a “hate crime”. Investigations showed a black female student staged the whole thing because she was angry at her father for not picking her up.


January 2007 – Texas – Houston – Samuel White, a black man, has kkkbeen charged with arson. In October 2005, he burnt down his own house and spray painted racial slurs and swastika on the walls. Police found the slurs were misspelled, the swastika drawn backward and that he had moved all his furniture 20 hours before the fire.


September 2006 – California – Petaluma – Eric Young, a 19 year old black man, claimed he had been assaulted on September 4th by three white men who screamed racial slurs at him. The police found out inconsistencies in his story and he admitted fabricating the whole thing.


April 2006 – USA – Connecticut – Ansonia - A twelve year old boy claimed he was picked up by several white males dressed in white robesklan_rally and masks, and taken to Linette Park where his face was sprayed with a flammable liquid and the males ignited it. The police showed he was burned while playing with a flammable liquid at a friend’s house. He made up the story to explain the injuries.


March 2006 – USA – Kentucky - Henderson – School authorities were extremely concerned when two African-American females and one black male at North and South middle schools received racist Email – The henderson police department found out that one of the suspects is African-American and that the two boys that sent the e-mails did it from the e-mail account of a high school student in order to get that student in trouble.


March 2006 – USA – Virginia - Fliers headlined “KKK congratulates images (91)gang bangers for slaughter of black people” were distributed at the Heritage Acres Apartments in Suffolk. the “white racists” turned out to be a black woman.
Keep in mind it’s never considered “racist” to slander whites in one’s community


February 2006 – Virginia – Powhatan – an anti-black racial slur and “white power” written on the home of a black family were thought to be a hate crime : a family member had written them.

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/partial-list-of-fake-hate-crimes-2006-2007#.VDsjSfldV8E

Seemingly mainstream, educated, intelligent black folk have been known to fake hate crimes outright just for the notoriety or sympathy or as a diversion for their own malfeasance. I’ve listed above, a few cases of hate-crime fraud from one single random year. I could just as easily link a good score or so similar incidents every year back as far as you care to go. If you go far enough back however, you run into Emmett Till. And at that point they stop being “hoaxes.” At some point, some white people persecuted all black people horribly in America. But that may well be the point: it’s been a long time since theimages (12) “black community” had a genuine Emmett Till experience, and some part of its psyche misses the drama of it all. My point being, if black folks have fairly often been known to self-promote themselves or their petty personal concerns via faking a racial incident, and sometimes do so out of the blue with no clear or serious reason or provocation, what are the odds that any time they think they are given some “legitimate” pretext to pull the “race card,” they won’t immediately display it, wave it about, making a great show of tears and suffering at the imagined indignity of it all?

Without the spectre of “racism,” much of the “black community” has no logical reason for perpetuating its own power structures and social conventions. They become, well, just plain people with no special status one way or another. They would be mutts, and multi-cultural generic citizens. They wouldn’t have or need an NAACP or a “black” liasons with the police from “black” civic groups who get to sit on boards and talk about “black” issues. If we have state and federal agencies that come down to the neighborhood and insure “civil rights,” what does Jesse Jackson do for a living?

You tell me.

On some level, too much of the “black community” loves to wink at the “wilding” and rioting and attacks perpetrated by its youth on random white folk in general. Some of its leadership incites it. Some of its leadership quietly encourages it. A lot of its leadership openly makes excuses for it, justifies it, rationalizes it. Why? Because if none of that behavior goes on, white people will stop hating black people. And if enough of it goes on, all white people will hate, or at least distrust all black people. As long as that arrangement remains the status-quo, the “black community” has a basis for remaining a special, protected class.

And that’s just another way of saying, they want to hang on to that race card.

http://takimag.com/article/my_10_favorite_hate_crime_hoaxes_gavin_mcinnes/print#axzz3Fyw7hLlV

http://www.lairdwilcox.com/publish/crywolf.html

Posted in That "Race" Thang | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Down with the Struggle

I have to admit even as a plain dumb white guy, that well late into the 1960’s, even years afterward, America’s south had steadfastly based its society, and toU1481040 some extent still based its economy, on a longstanding history of overt, institutional racism. By this I mean, you can pretend that even after the mid-60’s Civil Rights Movement peaked, and federal legislation was passed, and president Johnson announced the advent of The Great Society, Affirmative Action, and forceful federal intervention into school integration and other state and local issues soon became commonplace, the prosepect that “all men are created equal” was still very much a work in progress. It was a process that would take generations. It was not an event–just like Emancipation was not an event, it was the start of a long process.

I don’t know where to put the cutoff date–Michael Jackson’s performance of the “moonwalk” at the Grammies in 1988, his subsequent takeover of all pop music and gradual physical conversion to “whiteness,” or perhaps, definitely by the day in that same year when befuddled old white producers and network owners received the revelation, in stark contradiction to their combined history of “race-music” market research, that Yo MTV Raps made gangsta hip hop the new musical standard of young, white American “Whiggers” nationwide. The realization of Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech arrived in a transition that most clearly and rapidly came into effect somewhere in that decade of American youngsters. By then, the “white” American generations of newborns had in fact images (5)passed well beyond accepting any cultural, moral, legal, or scientific validity of the dictionary definition of “racism” as a personal belief in the inherent, genetic inferiority of all “non-white” peoples, and “Negroes” in particular. Young “white” America almost stopped believing in the concept of “race” at all, in favor of perceiving the world’s many peoples as “cultures,” and “ethnic groups.” The notion of anything like “racial purity” was essentially abandoned. Earth became seen by America’s youth as a planet of “mongrels.” We’re all “mutts,” and “diversity” is a virtue. “Racial Purity” is an ignorant myth. And to the point at hand, specifically where African-Americans were concerned, the vast majority of young white American kids envied “black” music, talent, physical prowess and general “coolness.” Being “black” in America was cool. Period. The hard-core, cultural “white” institutionalized racism even in the south, had become at worst a rare throwback surviving in isolated pockets of impoverished, uneducated, deep-urban ignorance, or remote and socially removed enclaves of rural white stupidity.

At least two generations have passed since white America’s first conversion to the
“coolness” of “black.” We have a president who in all honesty was elected simply upon the basis that he was “cool,” and “black.” Not even his supporters had any idea who he really was apart from cool and black, and this much has been all but admitted on all sides halfway at this writing into his second term. In the paraphrased words of Nancy Peloci: “We have to elect him to see what he stands for.” (But he’s cool and black, so vote for him anyway…how bad could it be? At barack-obama-cool-black-coverleast he’s not rich and white. And yes, that was almost literally the platform that got him soundly elected to a second term.)

So, in short, somebody has to go tell Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson: that was then, this is now.

As I began to say of the Civil Rights Movement Era, back “then,” all the arguments and observations I would make today about the state of American race relations would be utterly invalid. Conversely, all the protestations coming out todays crop of professional race-instigators, would have been entirely justified forty or fifty years ago. Yes, I’m today arguing entirely on the opposite side of a question I would have been entirely reversed on twenty-five, or surely thirty, forty, fifty or more years past.

Times have changed. Even as a plain dumb white guy, I have changed to meet those changes. Other plain dumb white guys have either embraced the same changes, or over time and through great social, legal, political, and religious pressure, been forced to concede and accept these changes at least on a pragmatic basis as the new “normal.”

Much of the “black community” however, has steadfastly refused to even admit, much less embrace these changes. They’ve romanticized, institutionalized, and fantasized their roles imagesin “the struggle” to point where, without “the struggle,” they are nothing–either socially, emotionally, or financially.

When the war is over, warriors go home to be bored and drink themselves into suicide and depression. Without one more skirmish to look forward to, they cease to be relevant even to themselves. Thus, elements of the “black community” choose to live in a warm, nostalgic memory of an epic battle for equality against the forces of white repression and the promise of a dream that Dr. Martin Luther King would probably concede today has long been fulfilled. I know his wife and family have, and have done so quite vocally.

Change is hard. It was obviously hard for many a “Whitey” to stop treating black folks like “Niggers.” And it was no doubt just as hard for some black folks to stop acting like “Niggers,” or at least letting historical, feelings toward “Whitey” keep them locked into an internalized cell that emotionally relegates them to perpetually playing out that long-passed societal role. Apart from a few blessed individuals and a handful of enlightened movements, as a broad body, neither of these two sides of the old racial, economic and images (3)social order in America were ever going to “grow” out of these intensely internalized attitudes. They were simply going to have to die off for America to move on. And that’s just human nature.

The thing is, “Whitey’s” offspring for the most part have moved on. The “black community,” however, has instead gleefully romanticized and perpetuated its role in “the struggle,” teaching its offspring from generation to generation that they have no hope against “white privilege” and “institutional racism” in America. Large portions of young “black” America wax nostalgic for a racial struggle they never fought in. And in rising numbers each year, a war for equality that neither their parents nor grandparents fought in. Indeed, the white, privileged Baby downloadBoomers who eagerly fought alongside the black leaders and warriors of the Civil Rights Movement, have since bred a generation or two of self-hating, white, privileged mall rats convinced that Oprah Winfrey being sidetracked by a well-meaning clerk from looking at a $38,000.00 designer purse in an exclusive Zürich boutique, who deferred her interest instead to to a cheaper model costing only $25,000.00, is “racism” and bigoted “white” persecution on par with theimages (7) local KKK kidnapping young Emmett Till in 1955, beating him to a pulp, shooting him repeatedly, tying a weight around his neck and throwing him in the river, simply for allegedly trying to chat up a white girl at the local diner in some hick town he was passing through down south. And this ideology is maintained as a rational, morally equivalent perspective on the state of “race in America,” even with a sittting, two-term black president in the White House–even after he won a pronounced victory in his re-election against heavy opposition and all the combined sinister forces of all the rich, white Republicans, the corporate conspiracies of the military-industrial-crony-capitalist underground government, and the evil empire of the wealthy white Koch brothers.

America in general has moved on. The old-school stalwarts of the “black community” haven’t. And that’s self-destructive, even if we accept the rather dubious proposition that some images (1)vaporous remnant of nearly intangible elements of “white privilege” actually exist–or that on a case-by-case basis, there are actual white racists who do occasionally affect the “black community” and its individuals one way or another, even if not always violently or openly or very substantially. It’s notasdf enough to keep you out of the White House–or with a black attorney general, keep you from control of the government and entire legal system. There aren’t any two offices higher than those in the United States of America. If American “institutionalized” racism and “white privilege” can’t keep the “black” American from taking those positions by virtue of a huge, entirely voluntary electoral mandate from the American population, then by definition there isn’t any other achievement, title, or authority in the United States that anyone else in the “black community” can’t accomplish.

I guess my message is: It’s time to quit’cher bitchin’.

download (1)http://www.cbsnews.com/news/oprah-winfrey-says-racism-kept-pricey-bag-out-of-her-hands-at-zurich-switzerland-shop/

http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-23626340

http://arts.nationalpost.com/2013/08/15/oprah-reiterates-claims-she-experienced-racism-in-zurich-says-she-thought-of-designer-tom-ford-about-incident-in-interview-with-swiss-magazine-blick/

Certainly, below the Mason-Dixon line, well into the 1970’s, the then openly, blatantly racist, southern conception of an eternally and inherently inferior “Negro” based upon a fundamental belief in that “race’s” genetically irreversible intellectual and emotional  limitations, was not going to work itself out “naturally.” Certainly not when the southern notion was also inextricably linked to a Biblical curse from God on the “Negro,” relegating the race to eternal servitude and condemnation. So, even a conservative, libertarian-oriented hack like myself can see that in that context, an admittedly Fascist, socialist concept of allowing the “government” to extend its omnipotent hand down into the

292oppressed black masses and elevate them to equal social and economic status through deliberate, artificial means, would have initially seemed eminently fair and reasonable—certainly to northern white liberals who weren’t personally invested in either culture anyway.

And, again, we must confess that this notion of “Integration,” was never going to Carpetbaggerappear either fair or reasonable to a white, southern ruling class who had already suffered generations of what it considered “indignities” and persecution by a victorious northern political structure which had plagued and beset the south with federal interference in state and local rule since the Reconstruction era. The white-ruled south wasn’t ever going to gradually, naturally come to the conclusion that it had been wrong all along about either slavery or the inferiority of the Negro race. As a people, as a nation then, the government had an obligation to do something to help even out the playing field on behalf of generations of the oppressed.

At some point, the playing field has gotten pretty damned even. That stands to reason if the job is a serious assignment and has been in progress since the mid-1960’s. And yet, the job of “field-levelling” pays quite well, so naturally, the playing-field-eveners want to collect a paycheck for as long as they can whether they’re done with the actual job or not. If they have to, they’ll start piling it up on the side that used to be the low ground. They get paid to dig, so download (2)dig they will. It’s just basic physics and human nature. The question becomes, how level is level, who gets to measure it, and ultimately, is “level” really good enough? There seems to have been no foreman or inspectors assigned to make that determination when the work started. And the “workforce” has already decided that even isn’t good enough. To be “even,” your really have to slant it a bit in favor of the “oppressed” at least for a while to “make it up” to them. This of course, becomes an unending task since nobody is assigned or has final authority to make a clear determination about when “up” has been “made.”

cityworkersWhen the Civil Rights Movement and it’s governmental legacy set all this “field levelling” and socio-economic earth-moving equipment in motion some four or five generations ago, apparently nobody was told to blow the whistle when it was time to knock off for the day. So everyone’s just out hustling dirt around whether it makes sense or does any good for anyone, as long as the paymasters keep paying them to shuffle dirt back and forth.

But the payoffs, the make-ups, the hand-outs do have to come to an end at some point. At some point, getting on with life is just your own damned problem. The eternal-collective-bitch-machine has to grind to a halt and you have to solve your own problems by yourself, one at a time, one-on-one as they come up. Otherwise, we ought to just admit that it’s America’s official position that black folks are too stupid, or lazy, or just helpless in general, to take care of themselves, and need to be appointed permanent wards of the State as a perpetually coddled and protected class.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstruction_Era

http://www.history.com/topics/reconstruction

http://www.google.com/imgres?start=289&sa=X&biw=1920&bih=922&tbm=isch&tbnid=09cFowDyCyLcpM:&imgrefurl=http://www.docstoc.com/docs/126291938/Black-Codes-of-the-South-in-Reconstruction-Era&docid=KtD1siWe_tgFJM&imgurl=http://img.docstoccdn.com/thumb/orig/126291938.png&w=1500&h=1125&ei=WugHUo6NDNCjqwGi5IGwBQ&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:10,s:300,i:34&iact=rc&page=8&tbnh=176&tbnw=235&ndsp=47&tx=125&ty=93#imgdii=09cFowDyCyLcpM%3A%3BmpPVdIPRRt-L6M%3B09cFowDyCyLcpM%3A

I didn’t grow up in the Jim Crow South. Neither did most of you probably—whatever color you think you are. Certainly, neither did most of the current crop of “black” activist-whiners sniveling for some sort of restitution or compensation for “400 years of slavery” in America. Today’s reality even in the south is radically divorced from the bona fide racists three or four generations back who ran Dixie at the height of the Civil Rights Movement. pretensions that nothing has changed in all tpassing_strange03hese generations is nothing less than self-serving BS. But Stew in the wonderful musical play Passing Strange says it best:

  • “Do you know what it’s like to hustle for dimes on the mean streets of South Central?”
    • “Nobody in this play knows what it’s like to hustle for dimes on the mean streets of South Central.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X0x1Pra3tQ

I spent a year in East Tennessee, Johnson City, or more precisely, Jonesborough, (Jonesboro) in 1968.  I was a 13-year-old Yankee at that point from Bellingham Washington. They called me “puffesser,” apparently because I read at grade level and could do basic mathematics. The geography simply wowed them. Yes, indeed, I could name almost all of those countries the teacher pointed to on the globe. What I didn’t know, was that my black friend Nelson couldn’t go into the 7-11 with me and get an Icee. Lesson learned. One year was plenty for me. That was not a fun year to be black in Tennessee. Or to be a “nigger-lover.”

They played a game down there called “Yanks andmap_TN_JohnsonCity Rebs.” Oddly enough, the Rebs were the good guys. The rules were, you chase the “Yanks” through the woods and throw rocks and sticks at them. If you catch them they get “nutzed.” I needn’t tell you who got to be the “Yank.” I know they were still fighting the “War Between the States,” as late as the Spring of 1969. And I bet they’re still fighting it, in fact I know they’re still fighting it. But I’m getting ahead of myself.

No, I’m not “down with the struggle,” but I got a taste of it and that was enough to last me a lifetime. Much of the “black community” however, seems to imagine that just being black automatically gives you a complete understanding of the history of the “struggle.” It doesn’t. I can tell you a lot of very creepy stories about the way white folks talked about black folks back in Tennessee in 1968, and that was after all the Civil Rights legislation and federal intervention. And they 1346780081_the-civil-rights-movement-brought-an-end-to-businesses-thatdidn’t just talk bad about black folk. They tended to shoot them a lot for very little reason. And beat them up frequently for sport.

Today’s thugged-out urban black youth, especially in the north, throw the names and places and dates of epic Civil Rights Era battles around as if they understand it all, but they don’t even know the basics. And oddly enough, they almost universally don’t know that the attack dogs and fire hoses set on their forefathers during the Freedom Marches were let go by Democrats. They don’t know the Republicans are the party of Lincoln and emancipation, and the heritage of Civil Righteousness during the Reconstruction of the south that gave them the vote, 40 acres and a mule. They don’t know the Democratic Party was the political arm of the KKK well into the 1970’s, and that when Dr. King was fighting the Klan, he was fighting Democrats.4f70d35763e36.image They don’t know that where the “black community” was concerned, Malcolm X called you a “chump” and a “traitor to your race” for continuing to vote for Democrats who were doing you no good:

Anytime you throw your political weight behind a political Party that controls two-thirds of the government and that Party can’t keep the promises made to you during election time, and you are dumb enough to walk around and identify yourself with that Party, you are not only a chump but you are a traitor to your race.

http://newsninja2012.com/malcolm-x-speaks-out-about-democratic-party-and-how-they-use-black-americans-2012-06-10/#axzz2bhary3Ww

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRqbBM1t-rc

Martin Luther King simply demanded that America enforce a Constitutionally guaranteedAfrican-Americans-Flee-the-South set of basic human rights, give black folk the same status as white folk, and let everyone get on with it. Hit the ground running he argued in a sense, and let’s take it from here. Malcolm X was even plainer in stating that the Negro didn’t want or need a handout. Just an even chance at what America AA-Civil Rights-FN66897 - 3 copyhad to offer. What happened instead in America, was that the white, political movers and shakers of the day, listening to “progressive” “black community leaders,” who weren’t intellectually or spiritually worthy to lace up the shoes of the original Civil Rights icons like King and Malcolm X, who had died in the fight. Latecomers. Opportunists. “Black community” parasites filled in the leadership vacuum and sunk in their fangs, and gripped in their grubby meat hooks to become permanently attached to the political payoff sow. Soon the “white power structure” got intellectualized, evangelized, and popularized, into a collective sense of northern, liberal white guilt and initiated a series of legislative acts that have permanently fogged over Dr. King’s bright American dream, with a debilitating haze of permanent entitlement.

As Malcolm X observed: If they give it to you, they can take it away. If you demand more than equality, then next time you’ll expect more than that. He added, that by accepting the temporary solution of a handout from the “white power structure,” (meaning in his day basically the government) the immediate problem is solved only for you, but not your children and not theirs, because the real problem will never be solved by redistribution of wealth from the white “ruling class” to the Negro:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfiOOm2MK-o

1856_Tammany56911Lyndon Johnson called it “The Great Society.” What it really was, is a system of paybacks and handouts in exchange for votes. Johnson didn’t invent it. It was an old Democratic Party program. It dates back to the Irish influx into New York versus the “Nativists” in all through the 1800’s. Hell, if the Micks can vote, then we want the Irish vote. That’s how Tammany Hall continued the Democrat’s rule in a changing ethnic environment in the day.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/582027/Tammany-Hall

http://www.history.com/news/history-lists/7-infamous-gangs-of-new-york

http://urbanography.com/5_points/

http://www.albany.edu/~dkw42/tweed.html

And still today, starting from the Civil Rights Era to the present situation, the Democrats figure, if the “Niggas” can vote then why not? A vote’s a vote. As long as they vote for us.

(Fill in the blank with any given “oppressed” class or minority that can vote as a block.)

But race or immigrant status is not at all the key component of the scheme. It’s primarily a class warfare approach. Race or immigrant status is only coincidental to overall economic status, and therefore “representation” in the American cultural theatre, both politically and socially, becomes dependent upon these identifiable economic, often ethnically related classes uniting as a block vote to promote their own interests. Forfdr example, in the same era that black Americans were seeking basic civil rights, and the new-born Democratic Party of “Civil Rights,” as opposed to “States Rights,” was courting their votes, president John Kennedy created a massive federalized employee union system under the same theory of “protecting” the “underclasses.” Kennedy and his party thereafter, succeeded in buying the “union” vote in general, owned the public employee vote, and within a generation had likewise perpetually obligated the “black” vote to the Democratic Party. This is oddly enough, in spite of warnings from major Labor Movement heroes like FDR, the most lauded president in the history of organized labor, who on several occasions lectured at length about the nationally suicidal evils of giving trade unions control of the nation’s bureaucratic, legislative, logistical and other critical functions and infrastructure.

http://hernandotoday.com/news/hernando-sports/2010/oct/17/ha-fdrs-warning-public-employee-unions-a-no-no-ar-291004/

http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/02/18/the-first-blow-against-public-employees/fdr-warned-us-about-public-sector-unions

I don’t come from a Republican/Democrat American historical frame of reference. One side of the family were Mormons, a very communal bunch rather isolated from national politics, and on the other side, my people actually founded the Farmer Labor Party, an European Socialist near-Utopian body of God-fearing and hard-working immigrants from Scandinavia who formed communal systems of self-support based upon generations of not having good land or weather or mediapolitical influence with which to aggrandize themselves as individual, completely independent, financial or social successes. And it was only begrudgingly in the later 20th century that they held their noses and were forced to associate with the national Democratic Party for purposes of being represented in national elections that they became the “Democratic Farmer Labor Party.” Previous generations of Scandinavian Americans were far more inclined to be nationally associated with the Abolitionist party of Abraham Lincoln–the new Republican Party.

While most of my ancestors arrived in the mid-late 19th century, my paternal grandfather’s people came here in 1928 and they were mostly interested in escaping Adolph Hitler and a really bad economy in Europe. Grandpa Trygve, formerly of the
Danish Merchant Marines, “went up the street” as they say, in Superior Harbor, and never came back. The whole slavery, “black” experience in America didn’t really come into play one way or the other as far as I know for my direct lineage. In my defense however, my state, my “people,” and I’m sure somewhere in the blood lines if I looked it up, the Scandinavian, Minnesota population in general, were arguably the first regiment of volunteers from the North to rally to the cause of Emancipation and go deliver a serious beat-down of those Johnny Rebs at Gettysburg, take their frigging Confederate Battle Flag, and tell them where they could come and get it back if they had the moxy.

http://discovery.mnhs.org/MN150/index.php?title=First_Minnesota_Volunteer_Infantry_Regiment

mf001634It was only a few years ago that the Southern rebels we took it from were begging for it back as some sort of symbol of national conflict resolution. Our then governor, Jesse “The Odd” Ventura (James Janos) told them we won it fair and square, and they could have it back when they came up here and took it from us the same way we took it from them. Go Vikings!

http://ww2.roanoke.com/roatimes/flag/vote.html

But a few years after that initial request, they were back at it, wanting the flag to fly at a re-enactment “commemorating” the 150th anniversary of the battle in which they lost it. Even our current, Lefty, “feel good” Liberal Governor Mark Dayton, current leader of our fine state, had this to say about the latest request for its return as of this writing:

The governor of Virginia earlier this year requested that the flag be loaned, quote, unquote, to Virginia to commemorate–it doesn’t quite strike me as800px-1st_Minnesota_at_Gettysburg something they would want to commemorate–but we declined that invitation.

It was taken in a battle at the cost of the blood of all these Minnesotans. And I think it would be a sacrilege to return it to them. It was something that was earned through the incredible courage and valor of men who gave their lives and risked their lives to obtain it. And, as far as I’m concerned, it’s a closed subject.

http://www.timesdispatch.com/news/local/city-of-richmond/replaying-the-civil-war-s-most-famous-charge/article_dc015e35-618e-5005-bd8a-c93eb9d47a5c.html

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1084360/posts

http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/150-years-later-two-states-are-still-fighting-over-the-battle-of-gettysburg-20130628

http://blogs.mprnews.org/statewide/2013/06/no-virginia-there-will-be-no-battle-flag-for-the-gettysburg-anniversary/

The significant point in this Minnesota battle over a Civil War trophy, is that the 1st Minnesota Volunteers, volunteered, and volunteered specifically to fight for the emancipation of Southern, black slaves. The Micks and Jocks, the Scotch-Irish, the Germans, Pols, Jews, Slavs, Balkans, the mixed bag of all other immigrants from Lincoln’s Northeast, the soldiery Lincoln scraped off the pavements and out of the curbs of thecivil-war-239.-recruiting.-nyc.-antique-print-1907-wdjb--128164-p[ekm]400x248[ekm] Northern urban empires of the Union–they were a mixed batch of rascals with few honorable motivations. Conscription, poverty, adventurism, blood lust, opportunism, a chance to shoot Johnny Reb indiscriminately, whatever. They were not in any manner motivated by, or unified over any urgency to free the enslaved black prisoners of white racism down South.

But my people were.

So, I’m just sayin’. Crap on me for being a racist and it really rubs me wrong. And it loses you a friend. But then, those “black” factions habitually hurling around such claims against all “white” people don’t want to make friends. They want to be oppressed, or more importantly, be seen legitimately as an oppressed class, because it validates their failures in life and allows them to demand of society a free ride and excuse for general being a bum and ne’er-do-well. In the long run it dumbs-down the argument of racial politics and society in general and devalues the meaning of the label “racist,” or “racism.” Ultimately it is a losing proposition for those dependent upon the tactic, because eventually the claims become so absurd that even their friends and brothers-in-arms are shamed and embarrassed by the hyperbole.  Call me a “racist” because I think some saggy-pants home boy with his baggy-pantsdrawers spilling out looks like an idiot I would never hire, or a man I would prefer to have walking on the opposite sidewalk rather than shuffle down my side, and you’re the one who looks foolish. Not me.

I could go into an Emperor is Naked metaphor but I’ll quote the Bauhaus Manifesto instead:

Everything inside your head, your thoughts, your ideas, is a construct, put there by a system. Therefore: What’s inside is just a lie.

http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/passingstrange/whatsinsideisjustalie.htm

I can only see American racial relationships from my personal and family perspective. I’llimages (87) never see the situation from a “black” perspective. Still, I contend that most of what the “black community” is calling “racism” today, is perceived, not tangible. That’s an empirically demonstrable argument. It’s not just my opinion. It’s an impression they collectively enforce for social, historical, and political reasons. But it’s not reality.

It’s a construct, but in their heads, by a system.

Most of what the “black community” is calling “profiling,” isn’t “racism,” it’s common sense. They’ve chosen to poison a word, but the word remains valid and the concept it represents is a reasonable and accurate concept. Stereotype is the word aaaapoisoned in previous generations for the same reasons. But stereotypes are almost always based upon a very real, very common, very definable “types.” That’s what the word means. It may be wrong to “stereotype” all black people as “thugs,” but it’s just common sense to assume that those black people who are the right size, the right age, dressed in the official “thug” costume, talking the official “thug” language, and hanging out where “thugs” usually hang out in the dark of night, might be thugs. It is therefore quite reasonable to take some basic precautions in case they actually are thugs. That’s just the law of experience and probability working naturally in your head.

The thing nobody in the “black community” seems willing to ask themselves, is, am I being stereotyped, or is that all I really am? Have I become a walking and talking stereotype? Am I being profiled, or do I just actually fit the profile?

nprjuanwilliamsThe dirty secret, as Juan Williams, former NPR commentator, found out some years ago, is that black people profile black people. Black people profile people of color. Black people are people and people profile other people. That’s what people do. If you admit that out loud however, you get fired.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/media/july-dec10/williams_10-22.html

That’s not “racism.” Setting dogs on you, beating you senseless, and hanging you from a street lamp because you dared walk your “nigga” ass into a whites-only soda shop is “racism.” That’s what America’s great Civil Rights Struggle was all about. It wasn’t about some night watchman giving you funny looks or tailing you a bit because you’re dressed like a hood and prowling around in the dark. Dr. Martin Luther King didn’t give his life so Oprah Winfrey could bitch about not being shown aUS National Guard troops block off Beale Street as Civil Rights marchers pass by on March 29, 1968. $38.000.00 dollar handbag in Zurich because the clerk didn’t think it was in her price range. That’s just a load of asinine BS Oprah’s going to have to deal with on her own. If Barack Obama wants to bemoan America’s racism because he thinks as a youth, old white ladies would clutch their purses as he went by, because grampa White always put a hand on his wallet as he passed, it was just foreshadowing the day when he would become president and send armed IRS agents to take grandma and grampa White’s money directly out of their paychecks by force.

barack-obama-dope-2-smoking-punEven following our president’s observations following the Zimmerman verdict, what you’re really talking about today, is getting a few nervous looks from “white people” or being followed through the store by some wary shopkeeper who thinks there’s a good chance you’re going to swipe some goodies off the shelf when they’re not looking. Every kid under about age 30 of any race, creed, or color in America gets that from every shopkeeper. Even the black ones. It’s annoying. It’s insulting. I believe it happens and that it really annoys you. But it doesn’t really rank up there with police dogs up your ass and riot sticks to the head. It it isn’t equivalent to being lynched for using a public toilet labelled “Whites Only.”

If the Trayvon Martin example is going to be the impetus for some pretended national, or some ludicrous world referendum on race-relations, it’s imperative that we don’t just images (67)accept whatever the Martin Corporation is selling the nation and the world about the case itself, on the premise that all they’re seeking is the “TRUTH” about how their son met his end. They’re just people. Not particularly sophisticated people. Their kid is dead. They’re pissed off. They feel like they’ve been screwed over by somebody and they want somebody to pay. They’re looking not for “justice,” entirely for the sake of “justice.” No rational human being could believe that.

They are clearly looking for some sort of payback.44-Rosa_Parks Either revenge, or dollar signs. Not very much MLK in that desire.

Furthermore, the grieving Martin clan may however unlikely, actually be entirely genuine in their pretensions to pure motivations, but even so, they are surrounded by, or have surrounded themselves with, a support structure of commercialized, professional “black community leaders,” and industrial-grade “black activists” and other race-baiting lobbyists who have been in the business of profiting from tragedies in the “black community” just like Trayvon Martin’s death for decades, even some of them, a couple of generations. Most of mainstream “white” America simply won’t listen to anything they have to say if Trayvon Martin’s cause is connected with these racial ambulance-chasers.

0913_COVER_MARTINSINK.inddThe question that still baffles me, is how the black population can be so willing to believe that a clearly dorky and almost entirely harmless George Zimmerman turns into a bloodthirsty White Werewolf after dark and goes out to chase baby black toddlers and eat them, and yet becomes indignant over the suggestion that overt race-hucksters like Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson et al might have some sort of profit-and-fame-angle in this case. (We’re not talking about Rosa Parks or Martin Luther King here–though history now shows that Rosa Parks was a staged publicity stunt concocted by the NAACP.) Al and Jesse, most popular clowns at the Martin family circus, are clearly all about making a buck off of racial strife—not about ending it. It is dumbfounding to most “white” people, that the “black community” is that gullible. It is dumbfounding to me that anyone possessed of any level of basic intelligence, black or white, could so consistently bow to these racially embarrassing, cartoon characters as if they had any credibility left at all.

http://www.democracynow.org/2013/7/15/there_is_a_trayvon_in_every

http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/26/jesse-jackson-says-trayvon-martin-murdered-and-martyred/

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/07/17/jesse_jackson_trayvon_martin_protests_ought_to_be_massive.html

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/23/nation/la-na-nn-trayvon-martin-case-jesse-jackson-20120323

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/13/attorneys-may-get-to-delve-deeper-on-third-day-jury-selection-for-zimmerman/s

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/08/jackson-sharpton-stay-silent-on-school-bus-beating/

It’s not me out of the blue picking on these two naturally and perhaps, righteously aggrieved parents. It’s those two and their posse shoving their family business into my face every minute of every day for the last year until we as a nation all had to give their tantrums the time and respect they demand of us all. Well, they got their trial. It was one helluva31f17b40-0df7-4e25-82e1-d83c171927de-620x372 railroad job on Zimmerman and they lost anyway. Now I’m tired of hearing about how “dignified” Sybrina Martin has been. She barely knew Trayvon Martin. I’m tired of hearing about her at all. I’m tired of hearing about Tracy Martin the “perfect father” and “loyal co-parent.” He’s a cad and a philanderer who destroyed three family units and totally screwed up Trayvon’s head. I’m tired, tired, definitely tired of hearing about “Trayvon the Pure,” the holy martyr and Sainted black youth.

They got their trial. They lost. The evidence only served to point more fingers at Trayvon Martin, his parents, their family life and parenting abilities, than the nasty, bigoted, fictional, evil “white man” they had been promising to expose. They picked the wrong straw man to try to burn. They threw tar and gasoline and flaming torches at him for a year to the tune of millions and millions of dollars, all in court and on national television aided and abetted by an eager and willing media. George Zimmerman the straw man never lit up. Nobody could find the much-touted, absolutely guaranteed image of a ra173466202.jpg.CROP.rectangle3-largebid, racist baby-killer in either the evidence, or the personal history or nature of George Zimmerman. And we all had to look. And look. And listen. And listen.

Zimmerman has been politically exploited throughout this ordeal, as little more than a racial scapegoat upon whom Trayvon’s devoted cadres of irrelevant old has-been post-Civil Rights Era protest-codgers now want to pin the blame for all the self-destructive, cumulative problems of the nation’s under-achieving black youth. George Zimmerman has been shamelessly threatened, legally cheated and persecuted, hounded into a show trial through sheer political and racial brute force and intimidation. Having 1112346300failed miserably to get him strung-up at the end of that process, his tormentors now demand of the nation another crack at it through the Justice Department and the US Presidency–both of which are controlled by the two highest ranking officers of the US government, both of which happen to be black.

And of course, the New Black Panthers will put out another hit out for him if that ploy fails.

America wake up. And by that I mean liberal white America. And if you can, black America should wake up too. I know it’s easier to sleep and cash the government check from the Civil Rights Plantation, but sooner or later the “black community” is just going to have to wake up early, get out of bed, go out and get a job all on its own.

Don’t let a simpering, whimpering, weeping and sometimes even conciliatory Sybrina Fulton sit there between her legal, mercenary mouthpieces, prop her recently re-domesticated ex-husband up by her side, praise Jesus and then pour a thick coat ofimages (59) linguistic icing all over your plate to camouflage the big chunk of turd cake she’s serving up. Emotionally she’s very convincing, and naturally, you want to support her. But dead babies, like cute puppies are a cheap trick used by newsmen, documentary film makers, and other con-artists, to win a crowd over. That’s not logic, evidence, or reason. A good, long, fair and honest look at what she’s baked up for us will tell anyone with any sort of discernment that it isn’t pretty under that shiny emotional frosting. It leaves a bad taste in your mouth, and it stinks.

The friends of Trayvon Martin continue to put out contracts on George Zimmerman’s life repeatedly and openly. They’re still going on “whitey beating” sprees, brutalizing the old, the helpless, women, children, the outnumbered, shouting, “That’s for Trayvon,” as they run away laughing. That’s the crowd Trayvon Martin hung with. That’s the sort of legal, spiritual and intellectual geniuses we’re dealing with in his fan blos-angeles-trayvon-martin-protestase–not his mommy and daddy as annoying as they’ve become. Not even Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, or other any of the aging, obsolete, professional race-pimps who instigate and encourage this sort of violence with their hysterical rhetoric and their constant thunder of jungle war drums as they threaten us with Black Armageddon.

http://courantblogs.com/sound-check/fans-at-sold-out-ted-nugent-show-greeted-by-protestors-in-new-haven/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ted-nugent-protesters-target-new-haven-club-article-1.1419543

http://www.mrconservative.com/2013/08/22578-3-black-teens-savagely-beat-up-white-student-on-bus-obama-sharpton-silent/

http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/milwaukee-beating-victim-says-attackers-cited-trayvon-martin-b9955262z1-215656431.html

http://www.wbaltv.com/news/maryland/baltimore-city/baltimore-police-probe-whether-beating-was-retaliation-for-trayvon-martin/-/10131532/21004078/-/109kh9d/-/index.html

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-07-15/news/bs-md-trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-monday-20130715_1_trayvon-martin-george-zimmerman-baltimore-police

http://www.infowars.com/filmmaker-beaten-by-trayvon-martin-protesters-in-oakland/

Let’s face it: What the Martin’s group of political and legal gangbangers did both in and out of the legal system was to literally threatened to burn down the state of Florida or kill every last cracker in it unless Trayvon got his day in court. And he got it. You can’t honestly say any family ever got a more favorably biased, more rigged courtroom in which to maintain their claims. They got a prosecutor who stalled, hid, obfuscated, withheld evidence favorable to the defendant. They got a team of enthusiastic and very theatric11702c3f08d51fd1a4d98e1e7b9f2b2cal prosecuting attorneys who stood before the jury, repeatedly pointed at Zimmerman, ranted against his inherently evil nature in melodramatic cadence, rising to a histrionic peak with the oft-hurled accusation: “Liar!!!!!!” It was like they were there auditioning for the role of Grand Inquisitor in a high school play about the Salem Witch Trials, more than executing a reasoned prosecution strategy. On more than one occasion these clowns literally begged the jury to ignore what they’ve seen, ignore the evidence, the witnesses, the testimony, and just pretend what might have happened. What could have happened–saying almost in these words: go with your gut feeling and convict the guy if you want to. Maybe he’s not as guilty as all that, but you know he’s guilty of something. You can’t just let him get off Scot-free… dffsaThere’s a dead kid involved. Somebody’s got to be punished!

But not even a kangaroo court full of hopping, clever little prosecutional Joeys could get the job done for Clan Martin. And now they’re threatening to burn down the entire nation if we don’t let them have another go at George Zimmerman. To paraphrase the words of the immortal Barack Hussein Obama: “Seems to me I won.” And it seems to me, George Zimmerman won.

Because a man has a right to defend himself.

As Malcolm X put it:

“Concerning nonviolence: It is criminal to teach a man not to defendMalcolm_X_1-300x300 himself, when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law.”

“It doesn’t mean that I advocate violence, but at the same time, I am not against using violence in self-defense. I don’t call it violence when it’s self-defense, I call it intelligence.”

http://www.malcolm-x.org/quotes.htm

Time to shut up and go home. Move on. It was a simple case of self-defense. Race never entered the trial. Stand your Ground laws never entered the trial. Nothing more to see here folks. If you want to make some greater point about race in America, you’re going to have to start somewhere else other than Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman. And if you’re going to bring great “black community leaders” like Oprah Winfree into it at all, you’ve already lost “white America.” You’re talking to yourselves out there. And nobody but you wants to hear it any more.

Getting your feelings hurt in Zürich over a clerk who thought a $38,000.00 might be out of your price range for a custom-designed alligator purse is not the same as “institutional racism.”

Wake up and Smell the 21st Century.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/07/16/DOJ-phone-call-Zimmerman

Posted in That "Race" Thang, Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Organ Grinders

Lately, self-designated “leaders” of the “black” underprivileged class (whatever the hell that means at this point) are hopping out of the weeds like swarms of pissed-off locusts, coming at us from around corners, falling out of the trees, scrambling down theimages (64) street to gather up their “black community” lynch mobs as they go to avenge the memory of Trayvon Martin. As far as their message goes, if we just throw George Zimmerman into prison, somehow all their problems are resolved. They cry out for “justice” for Trayvon, and they keep marching for it and protesting for it, and singing anachronistic Civil Rights Era ballads for it. What is it then? “Whitey” just gets nagged and threatened and bullied into putting Georgie Z behind bars? Is that it?

And then what? Some “nigga” in stir gets to shank him?

Surely, the “Justice for Trayvon” fad will piss away into history, just like every other big modern Civil Rights fad. But it is only a matter of time before some other affected outrage will trigger yet another string of race-riots and street violence in the “black community.” And it’s our own fault—all the plain dumb white folk and plain dumb folk of color who meant well but basically destroyed the entire “black community” identity as self-actualizing human beings. We as a nation have taught the “black community” and its “leaders,” that all prosperity in the United States of America lies in getting money or other concessions out of THE MAN. And the best way to do that is by doing a sort of “monkey dance.” I’m dating myself, but in the days of the poor immigrant barrel-organ grinder, the grinder’s monkey dances, puts out his hat, and we toss coins in his cup for the amusement of it all. Now, the original organ grinders were just impoverished foreigners fresh off the boat, simply trying to survive. There was no internet, TV, radio was rare and expensive, and the theatre or flickers (movies that is my American youth) were expensive as well. But cute little monkeys were all about amusement. And the grinder would hang out anywhere he found a crowd. You couldn’t ignore them. Gosh that monkey’s working hard! Give him something man, you gotta! Come on you cheap bastards! Fork over for the cute little monkey! And even in poor neighborhoods, the pennies would always tinkle into the cup.

Even though today’s organ grinders are all about drama, fear, and racial desperation, it’s the same concept: We put on the show. You get all involved. You feel morally compelled to pay for it. “You” meaning “us” meaning “We the People.” All of the “people.”

In response to the furious organ-cranking of the likes of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, who inflame and incite the indignant rise of the “black community,” with their histrionic, musical strains, we see the legions of long-trained and well-rehearsed little dance monkeys eager to join the call, put out their hats and hit the street corners and public squares, anywhere a crowd might be gathered for a show. But we also see the white liberal political doc51c860c25fe943146388123establishment hopping out of the same trees and scrambling out of the same bushes, rushing along with the faddish new black street-dance troupes. These self-hating white liberal guilt-mongers, are quite eager and willing to give these collectives of “black community” musical street theater companies, guilt-relieving payoffs through taxes and various “government social programs” funded by extorted “donations” pulled straight out of the paychecks of plain dumb working folk of all colors.

Man you gotta give these cute little dance-monkeys something! They’re working so hard!

This arrangement, this dramatic, choreographed socio-political dance, has become a fixed, symbiotic relationship between the “oppressed masses,” those who exploit them internally, and those who pander to them externally. And to tell the truth, if you step back, take a really good look, it’s stilly a pretty funny little act. Very amusing indeed.

In about 100% of these cases, a goodly portion of benefits skimmed off the wages of productive citizens, goes directly into the bank account of some self-designated “leader” or “leaders” of said minority community. In the case of America’s present racial tension, this proposition is tolerated for the most part, because “Whitey” collectively concedes the notion that somehow he owes “Blacky.” Furthermore, “Whitey” is often willing to believe Elenor Holmes Norton First Hearing Congressional x2V52jwiettlthat somehow, because “Whitey” has a job, works hard and makes money, this very activity, his various labors and efforts and industry, his very existence and financial success, can only have come, can only continue to come, at the expense of the “underprivileged.” It’s not new thinking by any means. It’s the root of Marxist economic and social theory. It’s also the reason the Soviet Union collapsed. Because, it’s generally not all that true. In fact, it can only be completely true in a State controlled by permanent one-party rule, dictatorship, monarchy, or fascist, crony capitalism, where the State, ruler, king or Party chooses all the winners and losers from a select list of supporters by caveat, whim, or legislation, and awards or redistributes the nation’s wealth according to personal or ideological dictates. In short, the sort of State Barack Hussein Obama envisions.

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/b/barackobam409183.html

Even in a communist State, where kings are deposed by farmers and shopkeepers and thefidel-jesse-1984-300x192 dictatorship of the masses rules, eventually the peasants realize the Party is just as big an arsehole as the Czar was, and they still don’t have a damned thing to show for all their efforts. The late-great Chinese revolutionary and communist dictator, Chairman Mao, claimed, sooner or later, every revolution goes conservative. What he really meant was, after you kill off the monarchy, all the academics, the intellectuals, the petite bourgeois, the doctors, lawyers, businessmen, skilled artists and craftsmen and productive merchants, it’s hard to keep selling the masses on the idea that they’re still really having fun, that they really need the party, that their continued hard work remains vital to the struggle, when all life really comes down to is working your ass of all day same as you ever did before, and all you get out of it is a bowl of rice.

130308110317-jackson-chavez-story-topRevolution is all exciting and warming when you think you’re opening a big can of “whoop ass” on the emperor. Payback is a bitch baby. But after that fun is all over, you start to realize you’re still just digging around in a turd-filled rice paddy for a living, only, instead of a landlord who built an agricultural empire standing over you, now it’s some Party committee chair who used to repair bicycles on the street corner, who knows nothing about farming yet he’s nagging you day and night about quotas and productivity in the collective. As the Soviets found out, it doesn’t matter how loyal to the Communist Party good ol’ Yuri the tractor mechanic is. Most of the time when you pull him off the shop floor, make him a hero of the revolution, and put him in charge of the whole production line, it turns out he’s a miserable failure as a factory manager. And since you just killed all the bastard capitalists who used to run the place so productively, you’re stuck with Yuri for the duration. Or someone just like him.

The American Civil Rights Movement has many parallels with the Labor Movement or evenmarch8-602x365_thumb2 all-out communist or socialist State-wide revolutions, and I don’t just mean a general, socialist orientation in its ideology. For one thing, a big cheer goes up for the end of segregation, or emancipation, and the next day you’ve got 40 acres and a mule and you’re still farming rocks in a crap-hole village somewhere in Alabama, with nothing else to your name. Or you can now proudly use the whites-only water fountain and sit at the counter in the soda shoppe. But you still don’t plowinginsclocahave a damned dime to pay for the lemon fizz.

Like most socialist-style revolutions, the two brightest, most educated and self-educated, leaders of the American Civil Rights Movement, Dr. Martin Luther King, and Malcolm X, or El Haj Malik El Shabazz as he became known later, were killed off just as the revolution 20061206_robertkennedy_2they started had peaked. Whereas communist revolutions often deliberately kill off their best and brightest so the Party can ultimately rule from an inherently stupid, but popular base of former troglodytes and tinkers, the Civil Rights Movement seems to have lost its greatest minds via the actions of external foes. (Ostensibly, but not proven inarguably.) However, 1948_Humphreylike the Russian Revolution, after the fighting was over, the movement carried on under often predatory, lesser visionaries. Some of them blind visionaries. Some of them just village idiots who rose to power in the Party. Likewise, John and Bobby Kennedy, the two Ivy-League,  northern, white, liberal political leaders who’d made Universal Civil Rights a populist movement, were assassinated in the course of the struggle. They left behind them, Lyndon Johnson and Teddy Kennedy, to stumble through theijfkandlbjr own often ignorant and feeble pretentions to the Kennedy throne of political righteousness. In Minnesota, we had the well-meaning but typically 2nd tier favorite, Hubert Horatio Humphrey, the man who actually set the Kennedy’s off into the Civil Rights Movement as part career enhancement, and part crusade.

Martin Luther King said:

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at a table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a desert state, sweltering with the heat of injustice and oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/martin-luther-kings-speech-dream-full-text/story?id=14358231

Malcom-X-Quote_thumb1

Malcolm X said:

“I am not a racist. I am against every form of racism and segregation, every form of discrimination. I believe in human beings, and that all human beings should be respected as such, regardless of their color.”

http://simple.wikiquote.org/wiki/Malcolm_X

This religion recognizes all men as brothers. It accepts all human beings as equals before God, and as equal members in the Human Family of Mankind. I totally reject Elijah Muhammad’s racist philosophy, which he has labeled ‘Islam’ only to fool and misuse gullible people as he fooled and misused me. But I blame only myself, and no one else for the fool that I was, and the harm that my evangelical foolishness on his behalf has done to others.

http://simple.wikiquote.org/wiki/Malcolm_X

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_ys74y9xXA

His successor, some say, his executioner, Louis Farrakhan, continues to preach about thedownload-29_thumb “White Devil.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=voIcRiWFR5k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EfuZoJ7jopo

Teddy Kennedy’s most famous moment came at theABC_JOHN_ROBERT_TED_KENNEDY_090617_wn bottom of a tidal pond on Chappaquiddick Island, where he went off the road drunk and killed his date.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/incident-on-chappaquiddick-island

Jesse Jackson’s only claim to fame is that he happened to be on the balcony when King gotgty_mlk_assassination_kb_130403_wmai shot and some guy took a picture of him pointing dramatically at something. He’s currently on his second or third major sex scandal, on top of a series of wrongful termination, sexual harassment, and other funding-related scandals connected to his “Push Coalition.”

http://www.bet.com/news/national/2011/04/18/ten-years-after-one-sex-scandal-jesse-jackson-sr-faces-another.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/21/jesse-jackson-sexual-harassment-tommy-bennett_n_974310.html

http://wendyista.blogspot.com/2011/04/ex-employee-rev-jesse-jackson.html

553414_10151465395921793_2138243192_[2]His son, Jesse Jackson Jr.,  was just convicted and sentenced to00 30 months in jail for embezzling $750,000.00 out of his campaign funds and spending it on personal items. So, not much hope for a legacy there either.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57598500/former-rep-jesse-jackson-jr-to-serve-30-month

s-in-prison/

cAl Sharpton began as a bottom-feeder and veritable nobody in the “black community.” But bravado easily fills a vacuum in leadership in those circles

adfasdf

apparently. Sharpton is a veritable scandal magnet compared to either of the Jacksons. He’s not always involved in personal scandal that is, but he just likes championing them on behalf of others who are personally involved. He never gets them right however. And then of course, he was was behind the demise of his mentor, Jesse Jackson, who had an affair with the executive director of his nonprofit organization. It was Sharpton who first passed the rumor that Jackson had fathered a lovechild, and used it to knock him down a few pegs in the competition for head “spokesman” for theTracy Martin Rev Jamal Bryant Trayvon Martin RhDFIkn0l3Mx “black community.” When some years later Sharpton abruptly announced his own divorce under mysterious circumstances, he changed his self-righteous tone, and  countered suggestions of his own adultery by preaching, “he who is without sin cast the first stone.”

http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-11-30/news/what-al-did-to-jesse/

http://www.redstate.com/2013/06/04/scandals-evidence-and-the-reverend-al-sharpton/http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-11-30/news/on-a-new-high-sharpton-hits-a-new-low/

http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20099354,00.html

13HPy

Al Sharpton’s biggest claim to fame is making a lying brat named Tawana Brawley a cause for national black retribution on the “white” race a generation ago, when he held her up as the victim of a brutal white gang rape, only to have images-39_thumb1the world eventually find out that she invented the whole story.

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-nyt-revisits-tawana-brawley-rape.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2013/08/06/she-said-

tawana-brawley-bad-boys-of-summer-and-buying-a-car/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/05/tawana-brawley-hoax_n_3709058.html

posthttp://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/al-sharpton-true-role-crown-heights-yankel-rosenbaum-brother-speaks-article-1.945812

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/07/al-sharptons-exploiting-trayvon-martins-death-just-as-he-did-in-crown-heights-2681452.html

Sharpton followed the Brawley fiasco with a couple of other ltCrownBlacksnotorious hoaxes, including the Crown Heights riots, where in 1991 he inflamed the “black community” surrounding a Jewish neighborhood, over the unfortunate death of a black child who was killed by a prominent Jew in a truly accidental motorcade crash, where another child was also severely injured, setting off days of riots and the murder of a randomly selected Jew named Yankel Rosenbaum.

In 1991, a Hasidic Jewish driver in 6a010536b72a74970b015390c4a251970b-800wiBrooklyn’s Crown Heights section accidentally kills Gavin Cato, a 7-year-old black child. Anti-Semitic riots emerged with Sharpton leading demonstrators to march through the Jewish neighborhood, chanting, “No justice, no peace.” An angry mob surrounds rabbi student Yankel Rosenbaum yelling “Kill the Jews!”. Rosenbaum was stabbed to death.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/zimmerman-martin-case/167259-flashback-al-sharpton-incited-massacre-freddys-fashion-mart-w-23-a.html

Not content with only two scenes of racial mayhem and murder, Sharpton went on in 1995 to perpetrate mass murder-by-riot in the Freddy’s Fashion Mart melee.

It all started as a rent dispute in the summer of 1995:

The United House of Prayer, a large African-American church was also a asdfadfmajor landlord in Harlem. They raised the rent Freddy’s Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned clothing store which had operated from the same Harlem location for over 40 years. In turn Freddy’s had to raise the rent on its sub-tenant, a black-owned record store. A landlord-tenant dispute ensued. As he has done so often in his life, Al Sharpton turned this non-racial economic dispute into a racial conflict.

The Sharpton-led protests began in August and came to a head on the morning of Friday, December 8th when Roland James Smith, Jr., who had been part of the Sharpton’s protests, walked into Freddy’s Fashion Mart, pulled out a gun, ordered all the black customers to leave, spilled paint thinner on several bins of clothing and set them on fire — a fire that resulted in killing 7 people plus Smith. The only African American left in the store was Freddy’s security guard Kareem Brunner, 22-years-old, who 51246_news_19082011_59316was ordered to stay by the mass murderer Smith.

At the time the faux-preacher claimed he wasn’t involved in the protests, he was only there to mediate. He also claimed there was no Antisemitism involved in the protests, but he has been proven to be a liar.

Soon after the massacre, the Jewish Action Alliance, a New York-based civil-rights group, released audiotapes of several of Sharpton’s weekly radio show in which Morris Powell, leader of the 125th Street Vendor’s Association, can be heard using racial and anti-Semitic language to encourage Harlem residents to boycott Freddy’s. Learning from his Crown Heights experience Sharpton let others push the anti-Semitic hatred but it was all done on his show.

“We are going to see that this cracker suffers,”  Powell is heard telling a crowd in one broadcast on  Aug. 19.

“Reverend Sharpton is on it. We have made contact with these crackers. We don’t expect a lot out of them. They haven’t seen how we feel about anything yet. We are going to show them.”

He also said:

They think they gonna drive this man out of business, they gotta be out of their minds. We are not gonna stand idly by and let a Jewish person come in Black Harlem and methodically drive black people out of business up and down 125th Street. If we stand for that, we’ll stand for anything. Which we’ve been doing.

At a rally was recorded on Sept. 9, Mr. Sharpton is heard telling a crowd:

1370263164496.cached“I want to make it clear to the radio audience and to you here that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business on 125th Street.

Ironically Sharpton was the interloper, he was living in Hollis Queens at around the time Freddy’s opened in Harlem and living in New Jersey when Freddy’s was burned Screen shot 2011-12-11 at 9.32.37 AMdown. When other white-owned businesses fled the neighborhood as the population became more African-American, Fred Harari the owner of Freddy’s continued to serve the neighborhood.

On an October 21st broadcast Norman “Granddad” Reide said:

I am saying to the Jewish community and specifically to Abraham Foxman, that you come out and utter a word, accusatory remark against Reverend Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Donna Wilson, Reverend Shields, or Gary Byrd, we will boycott you and nobody loves money any more than the Jewish people. Thank you.

In court papers filed the day before the fire, Harari and two employees described weeks of protests outside the clothing store in which demonstrators threatened employees, hurled obscenities at “bloodsucking Jews” and talked of burning down the store.

Aftermath
Sharpton, the professional bigot criticized NYPD investigators for quickly linking the fire to the protesters. But the police evidence and the tapes from the Jewish Alliance proved him to be a liar. After first telling the press “What’s wrong with calling someone a white interloper?” he apologized for using that term.  He never apologized for the Jew-hatred broadcast on his radio shows and spoken at the rallies he helped to organize.  He continues to deny that the rallies had anything to do with the firebombing
Of course Sharpton never apologized for Tawana Brawley or slandering DA Pagones by with the unfounded charge that Pagones was the rapist,

“I did what I believed….They are asking me to grovel. They want black children to say they forced a black man coming out of the hard-core ghetto to968837_553640044700629_926300148_n his knees….Once you begin bending, it’s ‘did you bend today?’ or ‘I missed the apology, say it again.’ Once you start compromising, you lose respect for yourself.”

..nor did he apologize for saying the “Central Park Jogger” was raped by her boyfriend and leading demonstrations calling the woman who was raped and beaten to within a hair of death a whore…
…and he certainly never apologized for the anti-Semitic Pogrom he led at Crown Heights.

http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2012/03/when-al-sharpton-incited-massacre-at.html

Sharpton continues to be the darling of MSNBC, of the Democratic Party, and of course the voice of Trayvon Martin and the “black community” in general. So here’s just a little sample of today’s current voice of “Civil Rights”:

That same year, anti-Semitic riots erupted in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights1994-0404-cover-250 section after a Hasidic Jewish driver accidentally ran over and killed a 7-year-old black boy. Delivering the eulogy at the boy’s funeral, Sharpton told the mourners:

“Talk about how Oppenheimer in South Africa sends diamonds straight to Tel Aviv and deals with the diamond merchants right here in Crown Heights. The issue is not anti-Semitism; the issue is apartheid…. All we want to say is what Jesus said: If you offend one of these little ones, you got to pay for it. No compromise, no meetings, no coffee klatsch, no skinnin’ and grinnin’.”

Within three hours, a black Crown Heights mob had hunted down and slain an innocent rabbinical student, Yankel Rosenbaum, in retribution.
Undeterred, Sharpton declared that it was not merely a car accident that had killed the black child, but rather the “social accident” of “apartheid.” He organized angry demonstrations and challenged local Jews––whom he derisively called “diamond merchants“––to “pin their yarmulkes back and come over to my house” to settle the score. Stirred by such rhetoric, hundreds of Crown Heights blacks took violently to the streets for three days and nights of rioting. Sharpton reacted to the chaos by stating, “We must not reprimand our children for outrage, when it is the outrage that was put in them by an oppressive system.” Further, he repeatedly shouted the mantra, “No justice, no peace!” According to Norman Rosenbaum, article-2252507-16A2A721000005DC-791_634x418brother of the murdered Yankel Rosenbaum, “Based on everything we have seen and read, Sharpton never called upon the rioters to stop their anti-Semitism-inspired violence. He never called on the rioters to go home.” Rosenbaum adds:

“The riots were the product of anti-Semites taking advantage of the tragic death of a child to justify inflicting their violence on innocent people — the Jewish community of Crown Heights — and murdering Yankel Rosenbaum, a Jew from Australia, amid the cries of ‘Kill the Jew!'”

Sharpton ran unsuccessfully for the U.S. Senate in 1992 and 1994, and he received 32 percent of the vote in the 1997 Democratic mayoral primary in New York City.

During the administration (1989-93) of New York City mayor David AlSharpton_Leibovitz_prDinkins (an African American), Sharpton angrily denounced Dinkins (when the latter was unsupportive of Sharpton’s activism) in the following terms:

“David Dinkins, you wanna be the only ni**er on television, only ni**er in the newspaper, only ni**er that can talk. Don’t cover them, don’t talk to them, ’cause you got the only ni**er problem. ‘Cause you know if a black man stood up next to you, they would see you for the whore that you really are.” (Click here for audio.)

On another occasion, Sharpton referred to Dinkins as “that ni**er whore turning tricks in City Hall.”

395818400_rev_al_sharpton__300x300_answer_3_xlargeIn 1994 Sharpton was re-baptized into the Baptist faith and became a minister of that denomination.

Also in 1994, Sharpton delivered an incendiary speech at New Jersey’s Kean College, where he said:

“White folks was in the caves while we [blacks] was building75432543 empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”[2]

Sharpton subsequently explained that while his use of the word “homos” may have been “irresponsible,” it “is not a homophobic term”[3]
The Kean College speech also featured Sharpton explaining that America’s founders consisted of “the worst criminals, the rejects they sent from Europe … to the colonies.”[4] “So [if] some cracker,” he continued, “come holder20sharpton2020ap_0and tell you ‘Well, my mother and father blood go back to the Mayflower,’ you better hold you pocket. That ain’t nothing to be proud of, that means their forefathers was crooks.”[5] Sharpton later defended his use of the word “cracker,” calling it merely a “colloquial term used to describe a certain kind of bigot, who hates both blacks and Jews. It’s certainly not a racist term and certainly not an anti-Semitic term, because a cracker hates Jews and blacks.”[6]

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1527

The Central Park Jogger case is of note mostly because of Sharpton’s immediate claim that centralparkfiveit was entirely racist and that the white power structure (in less polite terms) had simply rounded up a random group of black kids (and Hispanic actually) all from Harlem and railroaded a conviction. While these “Central Park Five” were all “troubled” youth, all known for “roving” the park and thought to be involved in other “wilding” incidents that had become such the rage with young black men at that time, with modern DNA testing they all turned out to be most likely entirely uninvolved in the infamous rape and beating of Trish Meili. Most of them immediately re-offended on other counts, and have since their release been re-jailed. One might think that ol’ Al was vindicated in this case, except for the fact that he also claimed the jogger had been raped by her boyfriend and repeatedly called her a “whore” saying it was all a fake and just a conspiracy to jail a bunch of black youth. Unfortunately for Al, shortly after the statute of limitations expired on the crime, one Matias Reyes came forward from the hinterlands, and admitted his images (1)complete guilt, further supporting the DNA studies that had already helped get the “innocent” parties released. And unfortunately for Al as I say, Reyes was black. And looked a lot like Trayvon Martin. He was the same age as Trayvon Martin. Same size as Trayvon Martin. And the crime was committed while he was out roaming the night aimlessly in his cute little “thug” hoodie. (In the thug-fashion of the day, it would have actually been some baggy “phat” pants, a white T or some other athletic gear, and a ball cap on backwards.) And, unfortunately again for Al, Mattie is also guilty of four other rapes and the murder of a pregnant woman. So, there is that. Apparently then, sweet, 17-year-old little black, Trayvonesque babies are capable of brutal butchery after all. It’s just hard to tell sometimes which one is responsible for which crime. In this case they got the wrong ones. But still, it was “one of them.” The heinous rapist-killer exactly fit the criminal “profile” of a thug teen rapist and murderer.

Perhaps, If Obama had a son, he would have also looked like Matias Reyes. Since he looked just like Trayvon Martin. Not very reassuring.

He wiped her blood off his hands and went home. Left behind, in a shallowcentralpark1c_14_205 ravine near Central Park’s 102nd Street transverse, was the brutalized body of a 28-year-old woman. Matias Reyes says he had raped and beaten her so viciously that he assumed she would die. The curly-haired 17-year-old boy calmly strolled north, into the night.

Thirteen years later, Reyes returns to the scene of the crime. This time he is in handcuffs, after a six-hour drive from the cell in a state prison near the Canadian border where he’s serving 331⁄3 to life after pleading guilty, in 1991, to four rapes and the murder of a pregnant george-zimmerman-lawyers-release-photos-of-trayvon-martin-holding-guns-blowing-smokewoman. For this visit to the 102nd Street transverse, on a spring day in 2002, Reyes is accompanied by investigators from the Manhattan district attorney’s office. They want to test the claim that Reyes waited until this year to make: that on the night of April 19, 1989, he and he alone attacked the woman who became known around the world as the Central Park jogger.

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/crimelaw/features/n_7836/

Not content with arson and mass-murder, Sharpton moved on to promoting still another race-baiting fable, by hopping on the backs of the Duke Lacrosse1a team with his Civil Rights jack-boots. The Duke athletes were also white, and likewise accused of brutally gang-raping a black woman at a team party. It turned out she was a hired stripper, who’s stripping partner later claimed had said nothing at all that night about having been raped. Phone videos and photographs of the girls being constantly snapped during their brief visit to the party, accounted for nearly every second of their presence there except for a few minutes, during which  time witnesses said they were in a images-47_thumb1bathroom together, apparently changing clothes, freshening up and doing their nails. There was no physical evidence of rape, and particularly, none of the ample DNA she was storing inside her, matched any of those she was accusing. Sharpton, as he would later do in the Trayvon Martin case, exploited an eager media, kept pressuring the political players he had leverage with, extorting the legal system, and dragging the team and the school through the mud at great expense until the whole matter Petered out unrewardingly a year later. Duke’s accuser has already been convicted of child abuse in connection images-51_thumb1with felony arson during an assault on her previous ex boyfriend, though the latter charge hung the jury and a mistrial left her free of the 7 year prison sentence it carried. Thus she found herself available to try to kill the next guy she hooked up with via stabbing him. As of this writing, the woman is currently out on bond awaiting trial on the charge of attempted murder.

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2006/04/17/483/93337/dukelacrosse/Duke-Lacrosse-Second-Dancer-Speaks-Out-Admits-Making-First-911-Call

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/04/18/duke-lacrosse-accuser-indicted-murder-charge/

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/40724688/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/duke-lacrosse-accuser-convicted-child-abuse/#.UggIupKsiqc

http://www.truecrimereport.com/2010/12/crystal_mangum_the_bodacious-p.phpA966-16

Lyndon Johnson? The Great Society? Johnson lied us into Viet Nam. Then, basically destroyed the entire concept of a black family in America and replaced it with a governmental dole system that replaced the husband and father as head of the household and breadwinner. Then he drafted the hell out of the impoverished, fatherless youth he claimed to be saving and sent them out to THE NAM as cannon fodder. The welfare system of America to this lbj1day, systematically rewards illegitimate births and single mother households, while rewarding black men to impregnate and abandon them, or impregnate them to increase the monthly grant, and then live unmarried on the premises via the dole.

Obama? I guess the”black community” loves him. He’s their current Supreme Leader and they like him. He can do no wrong in their eyes. In my eyes, all I see is a wealthy, Ivy League frat boy–a limousine liberal dipped in bronzing solution. He’s no Malcolm X. He’s no Dr. Martin Luther King. He’s not even Hubert Humphrey. Sure, so far he’s obama-smoking-joint-or-cigarette1_thhanded out 800 billion dollars in paybacks to almost entirely white union and other liberal, institutional supporters. Not to mention Fiskers and GE and Solyndra (scam) and the jobs and money these directly exported out of the country. Very little of that “payback” seems to be directed at helping the “black community” however. By most measures, young black males in particular are suffering over 15% unemployment rates by most estimates. And those are the cooked rates they’ve massaged by not counting those who’ve just given up looking, or never bothered.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/car-company-us-loan-builds-cars-finland/story?id=14770875

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/08/Obama-outsourcing-far-worse-than-Romneyhttp://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/conscience-

conservative/2011/nov/5/obamas-solyndra-fiasco/

http://townhall.com/columnists/briandarling/2012/07/16/obamas_outsourcing_of_jobs_foreign_policy_and_debt/page/full

ObamaBelieveWebPresident Obama is “Barry the Cool.” He’s what happens when a bunch of youth and aging adult children vote their favorite pot head from the college dorm into the White House, because he always used to throw the best parties on campus. Vote for Pedro and I’ll make all your wildest dreams come true…

The Right has correctly identified his

3259_680

“hip” commie/socialist sympathies and  connections to once-radical 60’s revolutionaries. But his conception of “revolution” is entirely trendy and superficial. It was popular on campus in the day. It serves political purposes occasionally. But mostly he’s a Chicago-machine, crony capitalist who only understands that the way to make money and win influence, is to exploit mass unrest and demand power and paybacks from the rich, from industry and business, in exchange for “peace.”

http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/27/male-african-american-unemployment-is-over-50-percent-among-dropouts/

http://money.cnn.com/2013/08/02/news/economy/black-unemployment/index.html

http://www.westernjournalism.com/black-citizens-group-files-articles-of-impeachment-against-obama/

Jesse Jackson probably had it right during Obama’s first campaign when he questioned Obama’s “blackness.” I’ve seen Barbershop twice. And the sequel. I probably know more ObamaKingBubblesabout the black experience in America than Barack Obama. But of course, I actually grew entirely up in America, and therefore am probably a bit less confused about the matter.

628x471-1_thumb2

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0303714/

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0907/5902.html

http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/obama-snubs-black-media

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2008/07/jesse_jacksons.php

Obama’s signature “accomplishment,” so-called “affordable” health care, isn’t affordable. In fact, his administration has missed most deadlines and granted employers and unions and numerous public and private institutions complete exemptions from participation in “Oba111solyndramacare.” Funding has therefore been transferred de-facto entirely to the taxpayer and consumer. We have yet to see that the primary target of this great “benefit,” the lower classes dependent upon public largesse for healthcare, are ever going to get a damned thing out of it. But more to the point, whatever the publicly dependent classes get, it is already apparent that the gainfully employed and productive citizens are even in the opening stages of this idiotic scheme, being raped of thousands of dollars a year to support the bureaucracy, and what it has actually exposed itself to be is a huge boon for the insurance companies as they simply pass on the increased expense of Obmacare’s mandated “Cadillac” healthcare policies directly to the consumer.

And all of the above don’t take into account his expansion of the Patriot Act, domestic spying programs, his abuse of the IRS to persecute political foes, and drone assassinations of American citizens at will from a personally authored “hit list.” Hard for me to figure how that makes a strong “civil rights” leader out of him.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/harry-reid-and-tom-coburn-agree-obamacare-was-designed-fail-pave-way-single-payer_745908.html

http://www.policymic.com/articles/44735/the-studies-are-in-and-obamacare-is-failing-miserably

In any case, today’s “black leaders” are watered-down hucksters in comparison to the legitimate warriors of the Civil Rights Era. Their causes are images (72)watered-down, and the “racism” and “outrage” they protest is watered down. More often than not, the causes they champion are trumped-up, over-inflated petty complaints, imagined insults, or just outright frauds and fakes. Trayvon Martin’s “cause” is a case in point. There was never any racism, systematic, institutional, or personal, whatsoever found to be connected to Trayvon Martin’s death or the fact that Zimmerman was not initially prosecuted. The9f60f-freedom2bor2bdeath2bfor2bgeorge2bzimmerman only systematic, institutional racism that ever came into play was the “black community” persecution of George Zimmerman. There is indeed a “black power structure” in America today, and starting with the Martin family and supporters, it extended itself up the political ladder until it reached the Florida governor’s office and threatened to burn the state down if George wasn’t prosecuted for something, with or without evidence. Race was never even mentioned in the trial because there was no evidence suggesting it had anything to do with why Trayvon Martin ended up tragically dead. The only racism manifest in the prosecution’s evidence, and yes, it was quite overt racism, was the repeated, constantly abusive characterizations of George Zimmerman being made by Trayvon Martin that night. It was Trayvon Martin who hurled images (68)rabidly homophobic, overtly racist epithets a Zimmerman, not the other way around, according to the prosecution’s own key witness, Rachel Jeantel.

Trayvon Martin’s case was not ignored or repressed because of racism or corruption or because George Zimmerman was “white,” or because he was related to some state judge somewhere. There never was a case against George Zimmerman to ignore or repress. The only way to get George Zimmerman into any courtroom at all to face any sort of charges, had to be accomplished through a politically motivated act of legal treachery that bypassed a waiting Grand Jury that normally would have determined if the state had a case worth hearing. Instead, hired legal assassins appointed from the Governor’s office went straight to charges of 2nd degree murder with a politically designated hand-picked special prosecutor and a images (73)politically appointed judge. To get their grubby little paws on George Zimmerman in a courtroom, Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin’s black coalition of race-baiting legal and political muscle heads, bypassed the well-considered opinion of the Sanford city prosecutor’s office, bypassed the professional opinion of the chief of police and the investigating detectives, all of whom said it was a clear case of self defense, in fact, the Sanford Mayor fired the chief of police because the Martin posse was threatening riots, and the chief refused to arrest a man without any charges or make up charges he knew would never hold up before a Grand Jury just to placate a mob. To get at George Zimmerman, the Martin team didn’t insure justice for Trayvon. They just bypassed justice for George, so they could continue to beat the crap out of him just like their favorite son was doing at the time he g636_Eric_Holder_flagot himself shot.

But Sybrina Fulton’s organization didn’t do it all alone. It had help all the way to the highest office in the land. On top of putting out tattle-boards online and recruiting dirt of any sort on George Zimmerman, Eric Holder’s Justice Department under Obama’s guidance Sharpton_s640x427actually sent trainers and security to facilitate a number of the major “Justice for Trayvon” rallies to keep the heat on the racial boiler. THE MAN is black in this paradigm. There is a “black power structure” in America, and it’s not just whining in the streets with its hand out any more. It’s running the government.

http://www.ijreview.com/2013/07/64710-eric-holders-department-of-justice-funded-anti-zimmerman-protest/

http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/10/doj-provided-security-for-anti-zimmerman-protests/

http://genomega1.wordpress.com/2013/07/10/justice-department-funded-trayvon-martin-rallies-judicial-watch-discovered-documents-doj-used-tax-payers-money-to-organize-protests-after-trayvon-martins-killing-with-barack-the-community-organiz/

Everything most of you think you know about Trayvon Martin has been a fantasy script 010213-national-sybrina-fulton-trayvon-martin-gun-laws-essence-magazinewritten by the Martin camp and their bigoted, hysterical handlers in the race-baiting industry. The notion that evil white racists with guns are chasing down innocent baby black boys in the dark for daring to walk through restricted white “gated communities,” is a boogie man scenario invented specifically to shock and alarm the “black community.” Roving bands of white, racist baby-negro-killing fiends is also quite easy to sell to the liberal, guilted, white “progressives.” Both groups have ideological and emotional investment in evangelizing the notion that all people of color are the victims of oppressive white, systematic, institutional racism, thatimages (70) they have no chance in America, and that they are failures only because white people keep them down. If you’re living in a mental time-warp where it’s forever 1963 and Dr. King is perpetually at the Lincoln Monument preaching world peace and brotherhood, demanding equal rights for black folk right in the face of an universally bigoted white-ruled government, while meanwhile, all over the south his brothers and sisters are being lit on fire, shot, lynched, blown up, and have barely got a claim to second-class citizenship, I suppose that sounds like an accurate observation to you. Malcolm X however, moved on from that. Dr. King’s family moved on from that. Betty Shabazz moved on from that. Why don’t you?

birthI’m not buying the palpable specter of a still-ruling Jim Crow south, alive and well in a pickup full of hillbilly rednecks out all night lynchin’ “niggas” as a major risk to the “black community” in 2013. Not with a black president for openers. Not when the Sanford Florida Mayor tells the chief of police to arrest and charge an overtly innocent “white” man to keep the “niggas” happy. Not when the Governor of Florida takes it away from the Sanford Mayor and local prosecutors, when the “niggas” threaten the whole state. And not when the Governor of Florida is further motivated to immediately produce an innocent”white” man in chains to avoid a threatened federal intervention from a black Attorney General, and a keenly interested black president. Not when the biggest problem the NAACP can find in America today, is some hick rodeo clown in an Obama mask teasing a bull at the Missouri state fair. When a broken-down cowboy in baggy pants and a Halloween mask being chased around by a bull urgently demands a federal investigation, there can’t be much in the way of actual racism in the nation to complain about.

http://rt.com/op-edge/obama-mask-rodeo-clown-racism-532/

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2013/08/14/212006020/nothing-racist-implied-in-obama-act-says-rodeo-clo

rodeo-clown

wn

But a racist, rodeo hell in Missouri, has only been the latest “white outrage” perpetrated against the black American. Not only do the white supremists who own and run everything in the USA threaten to run over black America’s de-facto king, Barack Hussein Obama,1376053437000-oprahwith a cow, but only the week before this shocking insult to American blackness, Oprah Winfrey, the richest woman in the world, valued at roughly 3 billion dollars, owner of one of the biggest media franchises in America, walked into a very high-end Zurich fashion boutique dressed in the shop’s estimation, like a cheap poser. She found she couldn’t persuade the clerk to reach up and hand her down a particular handbag she wanted to see. Well, that’s down to racism isn’t it? Or was it sexism? Was it just that she was a lard-ass and a victim of fat-ism? Did that fashionista just think Oprah needed a more massive bag to balance out her massive bag? Or was it just the fact that the Swiss-speaking clerk had a little trouble with English and was simply trying to explain to some curious American housewife, that the Tom Ford crocodile Jennifer bag she wanted to see was the very high end of the line and worth $38,000.00 at a minimum by outside estimates, and the shop valued the bag at $42,000.00. This would by most reasonable assumptions, be well over the budget of the average American poser. The clerk indeed, later explained that she was trying to steer herimages (96) customer to less expensive versions of the same bag.

When Oprah Winfrey can’t fly to Zurich to visit her tax-sheltered money, run her tubby toes over all the cash in her secret Swiss accounts, and browse handbags that cost more than a new Corvette, without some nosey white foreign shop assistant not recognizing who she is, what a racist world we live in!

Nigga just ain’t gotta chance!

http://blogs.marketwatch.com/behindthestorefront/2013/08/09/oprahs-2-9-billion-net-worth-not-enough-for-swiss-shop-clerk/

trayvon-martin-cartoonThe Martin family and their social, political and legal mouthpieces should give some serious thought to what they think they’re going to accomplish by continuing to rub the nation’s nose in their son’s death. If the case had been clearly and surely anything like the picture they painted a year ago, I wouldn’t have anything to say against them, however crassly they exploited it for fun and profit. But there hasn’t been a shred of truth connected to their entire story. Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin have spent over a whole year, not telling the truth, not seeking “justice,” but telling an imaginary story about a whopping huge, sinister white monster who decided out of the blue to go kill an innocent little black kid because he just hated “niggas” and he really hated them in his neighborhood. They sat through every day of the trial like little martyrs and victimized figureheads, just to remind the jury they better make the right decision or there was going to be hell to pay. They saw all the evidence. They got their “real” answers, the known facts didn’t jive with any of their ignorant, hysterical, year-old speculative fiction, and yet, they’re still trying to sell their BS story about the murdering white demon. Why?

The Martinista message remains to this day that America is chock-full of 0ppressive white beasts with their pale chests, their cruel guns, and their bright red necks. Their sponsors and boosters and a host ofdownload-21_thumb1 clinging Civil Rights Industry parasites continue to preach that the “black community” and “young black men” have always been and still remain the frequent and ongoing casualties of this deadly white predation.

But it’s BS. It’s BS, and I contend that somewhere deep down in her heart, even Sybrina Fulton knows it’s BS.

http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2012/04/12/trayvons-mother-sybrina-fulton-on-zimmerman-shooting-i-believe-it-was-an-accident-video/

The Trayvon Martin machine won’t even all-out admit yet that George Zimmerman isn’t white. He’s “white Hispanic” whatever that means.” Clearly, they got that patently obvious “fact” dead-wrong from the very start—because they didn’t care about the facts then and still don’t, save one: Their beloved little angel Trayvon is dead, and by God somebody was going to pay for that. They haven’t been on a search for justice. They’ve been on an evangelical mission to canonize Trayvon Martin as chi-15trayvonmartin-photo-20130714-450x315the patron saint of all the little black hoodies who end up dead in the night through misadventure.

What the Trayvon Martin conspiracy is doing is dangerous, and more tangibly deadly to the young black males of America, in a practical and measurable way, than George Zimmerman ever was or will be. If the Martin family and friends finally inspire just one of their devoted fanatics to put a bullet into George Zimmerman, it doesn’t save the “black community” from a single threat. George Zimmerman isn’t, and a million like him aren’t, the problem young black males face in the United States of America. Not even the fictionalized, George Zimmerman, the raging white “nigga-killer” is any statistically significant danger to the “black community.”

White, racist, actively murdering, hate-mongers, prowling the night for “nigga” with guns ready to shoot black boys on sight, in reality, are enjoying almost a statistical non-existence in this day and age. But the9173170_600x338-550x309 Trayvon surrogate who feels that Al Sharpton’s constant haranguing about white racist oppression in America, donning his official Trayvon “hoodie” uniform he bought from Sybrina & Co., taking a gun or knife or baseball bat out for a night of “wilding,” and “Trayvon Payback,” maybe even getting lucky and taking a shot at George Zimmerman, or any other randomly passing “white oppressor,” now there’s a very real monster living and walking among you. Creeping around among you all night, every night. Right there in your own un-gated, black neighborhood. There’s the real killer of young black males in the “black community.” It’s other young black males.

Take out Zimmerman, and that’ll be just one more black thug who shoots a free white man minding his own business. And odds are it will be for athletic shoes, a warm-up jacket, imasdfagespocket change and beer money, or just for the fun of it. So if you don’t think Reverend Al, and Jesse, and the continually sobbing Sybrina Fulton, aren’t providing these generations of restless, misguided young black males with more than enough motivation and justification and direction for their violent tendencies, you’re just lying to yourself. You set this pack of feral black youth out to kill off George Zimmerman and all his white friends, and the world will still be full of Trayvon Martins and their older, thug-mentoring black trainers. And they’ll still be roaming your black neighborhoods. They’ll still have guns, knives, bats, clubs and burglary tools. They’ll still jack cars and shoot each other in drive-bys and kill themselves in cockfights over territory and reputation.

George Zimmerman was never a problem for the “black community” or its young maleZimmerman8 component. George Zimmerman was only a problem for one young male member of the “black community,” and then only for less than one minute, and only because Trayvon Martin decided to get up in his face, knock him on his ass, climb on his chest, and beat the poo out of him. That’s a very specific set of requirements to make the George Zimmermans of this world a “risk.” And though these might be “rare” requirements relative to some nosey white guy packing heat running into some aimless, wandering “hoodie” in the middle of the night, the entire chain of events that led to Trayvon Martin’s death in respect to the social life of young black youth exclusively, is rather common if you replace George Zimmerman with any group of Trayvon Martin’s thug-wannabe peers.

You can kill a thousand white rednecks and tell yourself you’ve made the world safer for the nation’s little Trayvons. It probably won’t make any difference for even one of them. Sure, I bet you can find a thousand white racists fairly easily. It’s just that even they are not in the habit of murdering little black kids for racially motivated sport and bloodlust. It just doesn’t happen that often. So, in the “black community” it’s convenient to point your finger and blame them for all your little black casualties of the night. But that won’t make a single dent in the statistics that prove Trayvon Martin and his own friends always were, and 1000x665233always will be their own worst enemies.

Erase all the George Zimmermans in the universe, and you’ve done nothing to help Trayvon Martin’s memory or protect the lives of his peers. Some over-zealous community watch volunteer giving your little Trayvon Martin funny looks or following him around isn’t the problem you have to fix in order to protect the young black male population of the United States of America. You can pretend all you want that some big mean white racist just shot Trayvon Martin down on his own doorstep simply because of his black face and thug-style hoodie. But that’s just how you make yourself feel better about how you and your “black community” failed him, how he failed himself.

The way the Martinistas have conducted themselves in seeking “justice” for Trayvon has only made things worse for young black males. They’ve only emboldened the little Trayvons out there to be even more aggressive in their violent, larcenous, thug-like083 behavior, particularly against whites. Any future George Zimmerman who encounters them in some awkward or threatening situation is going to be even more anxious and fearful of them. The next George Zimmerman is now even more likely to be packing a gun and more likely to use it even quicker, with far less provocation. The Sybrina Fulton hysterical, hyperbolic, race-baiting juggernaut has only antagonized a white, brown, and multi-racial, multi-ethnic population that would have otherwise been sympathetic and willing to help.

trayvon-martin-gradDiscussion is pointless. Dialogue isn’t even possible. The Trayvon Martin crowd makes bold assertions and if you don’t believe them you’re a racist. That’s their entire shtick.

There is nothing to be gained by continuing a one-way diatribe about “race in America” or rather, “racism in America” if the “black community” and its representatives like Clan Martin are so deaf to reason and blind to the actual evidence in the case they keep pretending to be pleading. A black American president and attorney general, a
nation’s-worth of “black community leaders,” have deliberately cultivated a bittertrayvon-protest2-rt polarization of the population of the United States of America, around a legal case that has no bearing whatsoever upon any of the issues they raise in the name of Trayvon Martin.

Likewise, what George Zimmerman was up to with his gun and his neighborhood watch role the night of his interaction with Trayvon Martin, has no relevant connection to any of the inherently internal failings needed to be admitted and resolved in America’s “black community.” Attempting to browbeat a conversation, or bully concessions between the “black community” and the greater, diverse population is pointless until the latter has “cleaned up its own front porch,” as the saying goes. Why should the Irish, the Norwegians, the Polish, Asian, Native American, and American’s various ethnic communities of all national and racial descents, have any patience with, or desire to hear,090408_fed_way_attack_lg2 the constant, knee-jerk bleating coming out of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, when it’s so blatantly easy to point to Chicago and ask why it’s all your guys shooting us and each other to the tune of over 500 a year in Chicago alone? And why are conditions in the “black community” about the same in New York and Detroit? Big Democrat, “Black” power structure conclaves?

The combined fury and emotion generated by the prospect of convicting George Zimmerman and punishing him of something, anything, is a frenzy that has been driven exclusively down “black community” paths of adventure, from the streets of Sanford Florida, to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The movement has infected the thought processes of the “Liberal” establishment almost completely. But, to most reasoned observers, it looks like little more than a vendetta that could be titled, “Operation: Get Whitey.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeUlYtmi0ik

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nri6tPR8tQk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZI9tyS8g-0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_Jogger_case

http://theblacksphere.net/2013/08/black-teens-kill-88-year-old-wwii-vet-delbert-belton/

By making George Zimmerman a political prisoner for a year, and then shame-parading blacks_riot_trayvonhis “guilt” through a highly public show-trial, and then unquestionably losing the case due primarily to the testimony of the prosecution’s own witnesses and presentation of evidence,  even in a stacked courtroom fixed by a politically appointed special prosecutor, the Martin posse have merely provided a forum and case study in systematic, anti-white intimidation and persecution by the growing black power structure. The Martin vendetta against George Zimmerman has only shown our longstanding racist friends that they really do have something to worry about if the “niggas” take over. They’ve been warning for years about the “browning of America” and how it’ll be anarchy, chaos, and payback time for the white man.

Sybrina Fulton and company have proved to them it’s all true.

Now the organized racists and hate groups will gleefully place their soap boxes at the head of the bialsharptonbigangrymouthg gathering the Trayvonites have brought together so conveniently for them, and in the pervading atmosphere of being just plain fed up with all the race-baiting and whining, it will be easy to make their sales pitches. But the best sales pitch they could ever present to a plain-dumb white population in particular, is the lunatic exaggerations, the mouth-foaming, demented tactics and incredibly stupid rhetoric of the race-hustlers, hate-baiters, political opportunists and attendant posse of all-out “No Limit Niggas” that make up the constituency of Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin’s allegedly “noble” search for “justice.”artim-20091201

It’s a lot of things, on a lot of levels, for a lot of reasons. But it’s not justice.

I’m just sayin’: What’s the end-game here for the whole Civil Rights Era? What does all that blood, sweat and tears come down to in today’s terms?

Payback?

Posted in That "Race" Thang, Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Justice For Trayvon, the TV Show

Zimmerman_Trayvon_Oakland_Riot_Verdict (1)Justice for Trayvon Martin? What does that really mean? Do Trayvon’s parents, Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin, even know what they want out of that demand? And do their lawyers or the syndicated, civil rights mafia she’s fronting even care at all?

http://trayvonmartinfoundation.org/donate/ https://www.wepay.com/donations/3819

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/17/greta-van-susteren-vs-trayvon-martin-family-attorney-who-claims-to-be-a-social-engineer-ill-put-my-career-up-against-yours-any-day-you-want/

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/08/08/why-im-calling-out-civil-rights-hustlers-sharpton-and-dyson/ http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-03-22/news/os-trayvon-martin-al-sharpton-rally-20120322_1_national-action-network-sharpton-crowd

What exactly would justice look like for Trayvon Martin? For most of the Martin camp I tand_image_1373745955hink it would look exactly like a lynch mob. Mom and dad say they don’t want that. They say they don’t want violence. They say they want their son honored. They say they want justice.But…would they even recognize justice if it came up and bit them in the ass as this point? Do they really want justice, or does Sybrina Fulton just want to prove she’s not a bad mom? (Trayvon’s biological mother.) Does Tracy Martin (his biological father) just want to prove he didn’t screw up his marriage and destroy his son’s future because of the home life he shattered three times through poor parenting skills, career laziness and philandering? I’m not making charges, I’m just asking questions–questions that should ask themselves because of what the Martin camp doesn’t tell you, compared to the storyline they weave up front and their overtly weird familial arrangements.

I’m a Scandinavian. I’m a born cynic. There is no such thing as “face value.” Face has no value. But I had Tracy Martin down dead cold before I read any of this:

http://www.re-newsit.com/2012/06/trayvon-martin-who-is-brandy-green.html

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/06/29/the-alicia-stanley-story-the-only-real-mom-trayvon-martin-ever-knew/

http://www.newzzcafe.net/2013/07/trayvons-stepmom-speaks-to-media.html

http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/05/us/trayvon-martin-shooting-fast-facts

And I had Sybrina and her lawyers dead cold before I read any of this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/06/us/trayvon-martins-parents-settle-wrongful-death-suit.html?_r=0

There’s clearly at least two things going on here. One is the George Zimmerman case, which ostensibly is a done-deal. It’s wrapped up. It’s all over and turned out to be a straightforward, open-and-shut self-defense case having nothing to do with either race or gun laws. Wrapped up that is, except for legal reprisals liable to be very embarrassing for the special prosecutor and the Martin family’s Civil Rights Gestapo who usurped normal legal procedure through sheer political intimidation, and skipped right to an asinine 2nd degree murder charge by way of a gubernatorially appointed state-level prosecution (persecution) team that bypassed standard Grand Jury review. Frankly, there wasn’t any effort spared in screwing over Zimmerman’s chance of a fair trial.

A former employee of Florida State Attorney Angela Corey’s office plans to2013-08-02T221608Z_1_CBRE9711PUZ00_RTROPTP_3_USREPORT-US-USA-FLORIDA-SHOOTING_JPG_475x310_q85 file a whistleblower lawsuit against George Zimmerman’s prosecutors, his attorney told Reuters on Tuesday.

The action will put pressure on Corey, who already faces criticism from some legal experts for the unsuccessful prosecution of the case, which led to the acquittal of Zimmerman for shooting unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman’s defense has also called for sanctions against her and her prosecution team.

Ben Kruidbos, Corey’s former director of information technology, was fired after testifying at a pre-trial hearing on June 6 that prosecutors failed to turn over potentially embarrassing evidence extracted from Martin’s cell phone to the defense, as required by evidence-sharing laws.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/17/zimmerman-prosecutors-lawsuit_n_3607470.html

That there was no evidence of racism at all, much less killer racism, in the Trayvon Martin shooting was obvious to the original police chief and investigative team in Sanford Florida. It was also obvious to the original prosecuting attorney. It was equally obvious to theProsecution-portrays-Zimmerman-as-overzealous-wanna-be-cop state-appointed special prosecutor who was allegedly assigned the case under the self-righteous state mandate that Trayvon Martin had been the victim of unbridled, naked racism, and that the Sanford local authorities had refused to prosecute a “white” man just for killing a “nigga.” That argument never made it into the courtroom, because the proposition that George Zimmerman was any sort of racist was comical. There was nothing but evidence proving that George was instead, a mild mannered guy who mentored black youth as a volunteer in a community center, led a Civil Rights campaign against white Sanford Police officers who’d abused a homeless black man, and took a black girlfriend to his high school prom. Nonetheless, George’s Zimmerman’s persecutors gamely stumbled on with a brazenly hollow and awkward, self-defeating lineup of courtroom harangues, bad witnesses, unintelligible witnesses, witnesses and evidence that only helped the defendant, thus disproving most of their claims on their own, and pleading appeals to the jury centered around desperate, confusing leaps of illogic and fantasy, in their attempt to pin something or the other on Zimmerman. In the final moments of the case, the prosecution had panicked and determined it had no chance of gaining either 2nd degree murder, or the lesser included possibility of manslaughter. It began begging the judge to allow the jury to consider charges of “child abuse,” because Trayvon was still a minor.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/07/14/never-should-have-witnessed-zimmerman-trial/

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/07/11/Ex-Police-Chief-Political-Pressure-Cost-Me-My-Job-for-Not-Arresting-Zimmerman

http://www.clickorlando.com/news/exsanford-police-chief-tells-local-6-why-he-didnt-arrest-george-zimmerman/-/1637132/20923726/-/f0eymsz/-/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/sanford-bill-lee-exclusive

So that’s the Zimmerman trial. That’s one issue sorted out. Or should be. And then there’s this coalition of black American pissers-and-moaners determined to erect or resurrect careers as professional free-lance race-baiters or perhaps find or re-establish their position as “House Niggas” somewhere on the fertile plantation of the “Great Society.”Cornel2 And make no mistake about it, for this lot, they don’t really give a damn about Trayvon Martin except as an excuse to bitch, a venue for their bitching, and a convenient framework upon which to hang their collection of longstanding excuses for their own failure as “leaders” in the “black community.

http://www.blackstarnews.com/us-politics/news/cornel-west-verbal-shock-and-race-baiter.html

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2011/05/23/Daily-Gut–Cornel-West-Takes-Race-Baiting-to-New-Heights

http://www.thepeoplesview.net/2011/05/cornel-wests-race-baiting-antisemitic.html

It would be easy to single out Sybrina Fulton’s lawyers as the backroom orchestrators of this national production of a particularly clumsy racial farce. But that’s what they do. That’s how they make their living, and God Bless America I suppose. America is the land of opportunity, and they’re certainly opportunists. They’ve already pocketed around a half a million dollars paid out by the housing association of Retreat at Twin Lakes, where Trayvon died. They’ve tapped a victim’s compensation fund out of the state of Florida that may get them some petty cash, around 30,000.00 at the most. They’ve no doubt got a piece of the FL TRAY GPB Crump, Sharpton, JJ in backgroundTrayvon Martin Foundation, and who knows how much money that guilts-in off of “Whitey.” Their plan A, however, which was obviously suing George Zimmerman himself, ran into a snag when their coerced criminal prosecution culminated in an epic fail. (And I’ll bet Retreat at Twin Lakes is kicking themselves for not waiting.)

But, so far, Sybrina and Tracy have about a million or more reasons between them to play “happy couples” on the Twin Lakes settlement alone, in case you’re wondering why they’re back together all of a sudden after more than 14 years of hating each other’s guts.download (19)

Brandy Green, the married woman Tracy Martin was shacking up with at Twin Lakes the day Trayvon was shot, is out of the picture cold. Though you’ll hear her described cheerfully as Tracy Martin’s “fiancé,” that’s obviously not true since she’s already married and has long since vanished. Make of that what you will. Brandy Green is not Tracy Martin’s “fiancé” and never was. Not really. Maybe he told her that. But not really. It just sounded better for the cause than “lover” or “shack-up partner.”

Alicia Stanley, the woman who actually raised Trayvon Martin, and who is still may be married to Tracy Martin, is out in the cold also. But don’t count on that. Lawyers. Custody. Community property etc. It’s just a matter of time. Will CNN and MSNBC cover the follow up of that development? Not likely.

Stanley, who spent 14 years helping raise Trayvon, became emotional again when talking about how painful it was to not be able to sit in thedownload (22) front row at her slain stepson’s funeral.

“They told me to ‘get in where I fit in,’ ” Stanley said, getting choked up. “I can’t sit on the front row at my son’s funeral to see him home. That hurt me, that was the most painful thing they could do to me.”

http://www.eurweb.com/2013/07/trayvons-stepmother-alicia-stanleys-controversial-admission-to-anderson-cooper/

For a whole year, the public had been sold an ex-wife. The public had been sold a fiancé. Turns out neither of these two women actually had anything to do with bringing up Trayvon Martin. The woman who did raise Trayvon wasn’t even mentioned, wasn’t even part of the narrative. The real question to ask about Alicia Stanley after she parted her way through the Martin machine’s vapor of conniving fart-gas and appeared out of the cosmic ether to sit down before the cameras of CNN, is how much are they now paying her to shut up and go away?

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/07/13/meet-the-benjamins-tracy-martin-vs-alicia-stanley/

When Trayvon was a toddler, Tracy cheated on his biological mother, Sybrina, for some period of time, with at least Alicia Stanley and probably others. He then slithered himself out of Sybrina’s life and took up with Alicia. At some point early in his father’s divorce from Sybrina, Trayvon was shopped over to Alicia and Tracy, and they raised Trayvon as a couple in the same house, from the age of 3 until shortly before his death. That’s all 14 years of his conscious life. By then, Tracy had been shagging Brandy Green for some months, and when that became a problem for Alicia, Tracy moved in with Brandy at Retreat at Twin Lakes. He was probably just tired of Alicia by then anyway.

Though Trayvon had grown up with Alicia as his mom, and was raised with Alicia’s two tm1daughters from a previous marriage as sisters, when Tracy left Alicia, he for whatever reason, decided to send Trayvon to live with this biological mother, who Trayvon didn’t really know or care much about it seems. According to Alicia, he spent 90% of his time living in her household as he was growing up, and only had the occasional visit or sleepover with Sybrina and her mixed offspring from various relationships, including Tracy Martin. In any case, Trayvon didn’t take to that adjustment very well, and when Trayvon started getting into trouble in and out of school, Sybrina sent him to stay with his father and Brandy Green, at Twin Lakes.

The rest is history.

I think we can assume Trayvon didn’t like rooming with his father’s new girlfriend much either. The night he was killed, he had only arrived that day. Instead of hanging out with dad and his new squeeze, he walked off to the store, and then wandered outside in the rain all over the housing complex for almost an hour that night, talking to a girl “friend,” instead of coming back home to daddy. And then again, there’s the probability that neither Brandy nor Tracy were even home that night, and that they’d left Trayvon home alone to watch his little brother. Nobody’s publicly asking those sorts of questions for some reason, and though the police reports are no doubt quite detailed concerning such matters, no media outlets have bothered to pull from those either and explain it to us.

So, if the legend of George the “nigga killer” Zimmerman, is the first Big Lie told by the Martins, the second Big Lie the Martin camp tells is this tale of the perfect happy home with mom and dad and baby Trayvon. images (57)The Martin faction and its lackey press have systematically lied about all the basic relationships between Tracy, his son, Sybrina, Alicia, possibly still his wife, and Brandy, the married lover initially being passed off as a “fiancé.” Pretending that Sybrina and Tracy are simply a couple of grieving parents wins civil damage awards, gets you on the cover of Ebony, but Tracy and Sybrina Martin are a triple washout as a family. Trayvon actually came from three broken homes stacked on top of each other. Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton are not a family at all and haven’t been for over 14 years. They are not “co-parenting” as the popular idiots pretending to be “reporters” or “journalists” in the mainstream media pretend. Tracy Martin is a shameful example of fatherhood, and by all accounts Sybrina Fulton couldn’t tell you what Trayvon’s favorite breakfast cereal was, or what hand he used to sign his name, or even if he could write.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/07/and_the_oscar_goes_tosybrina_fulton_and_tracy_martin.html

http://www.chicagonow.com/families-in-the-loop/2013/07/alicia-stanley-george-zimmerman-trayvon-martin-2013/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/03/us-usa-florida-shooting-trayvon-idUSBRE8320UK20120403220px-Spike_Lee_at_the_2009_Tribeca_Film_Festival

To pretend that Trayvon Martin’s overtly dysfunctional multi-household family based largely upon serial adultery and abandonment isn’t likely to have factored into cultivating his thug-like behavior is idiotic. Trayvon Martin is a case study in why good kids go bad without sound male and female parental role models. But that’s not what the Martin team is selling. That’s certainly not what Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, or Spike Lee want you to think about. They don’t make money off of that problem. They’d never pull off a rally themed: We Oughta Kick Our Own Asses For The Way We Sabotage Our Own Community!

No, instead, the “New” Black Panthers put a price on Zimmerman’s head, and hypocrites like Spike Lee Tweet out what he thinks is George’s address and invites his quarter of a million militant black acolytes on Twitter to go and get him.

Twitchy, a site founded by conservative commentator Michelle Malkin, has been leading the charge against Lee’s actions by posting photos of his retweet alongside several tweets from others who advise that a visit to Zimmerman’s alleged address is in order.

“Get this mutha fucka!!” says one tweet with the address. “Dies,” says another that also includes the address. “Ima get a group of niggas to KILL George Zimmerman (the fat ass racist ass white man who killed Trayvon Martin)! He deserves to DIE!!!!” says another.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/trayvon-martin-spike-lee-george-zimmerman-twitter-controversy-304775

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/08/outrageous-ebony-spike-lee-cover-incites-racist-lynch-mobs/

Perhaps it’s been fatally ingrained in the “black community” that the drama and adventure, the eventual profiteering from the Race Industry that began in the Civil Rights Era, is thedownload (32) epitome of “black” stardom. Perhaps racialists like Spike Lee and the Martin family circus are simply trying to cash in on the fame and respect of being seen as a Civil Rights Champion, because there simply is no other success the “black community” really respects. The fact that one of their own has become president of the United States they have for so long hated and maintained as an eternal oppressor nation, rather than fulfilling their fondest wishes, just lets the gas out of their biggest bag of wind. Perhaps that’s why Jesse Jackson was crying at Obama’s election victory. He thought he was out of a gig.

Never mind. Where there’s a will, there’s a way.

Sybrina Fulton, mother of Trayvon Martin, has been a textbook example of courage in the seventeen months since her youngest son was killed by George Zimmerman. Thrust into the public sphere during a time of great personal tragedy, Fulton has carried her pain with incredible poise. It was no different when she spoke before the National Urban League in Philadelphia this past Friday. She told the audience: “My message to you is please use my story, please use my tragedy, please use my broken heart to say to yourself, ‘We cannot let this happen to anybody else’s child.’ ”

In that moment, she made the connection between herself and Mamie Till, mother of Emmett Till, the teen slain in 1955 for Emmett-&-Mamie-1954allegedly whistling at a woman, even stronger. Speaking on her decision to have an open casket at his funeral after her son’s face had been so badly beaten and disfigured he was unrecognizable, Mamie said: “I wanted the world to see what they did to my baby.” These mothers of black sons publicly asked us to use their pain to seek justice. However, the way we use that pain cannot diminish the reality of the people who live with it. By which I mean, we have a bad habit of acting as if black women exist only as props in the story about black men and it’s time to stop.

http://www.theroot.com/buzz/will-sybrina-fulton-be-remembered

Selling the lie. Selling the lie.

Trayvon Martin died because he doubled-back on George Zimmerman, a night watch volunteer who was keeping an eye on him until the police arrived after a spate of violent crimes 171496020and burglaries in the neighborhood. Trayvon did not normally belong there, he’d just arrived and nobody knew him. It was dark, raining, and Trayvon had been milling around out there for going on an hour, far away from the house where he was visiting. He did not just run down to the store for tea and Skittles. He was not just on his way back to his father’s crib. He was skulking around in the dark in a strange neighborhood for an hour in the cold and dark and rain. Trayvon had 4 minutes just to go home after Zimmerman lost sight of him, reporting that he was running away. His place of temporary residence was less than a minute away at an easy walking pace. Twenty seconds at a run, if that’s where he was really running. If he was truly concerned about being watched or followed he could have easily juTrayvonMartin_GunViolencwst gone home. Instead, annoyed at being “profiled” by a “white” man, he apparently snuck back around some buildings and got the jump on  Zimmerman, the night watchman who was annoying him with his vigilance. When Trayvon Martin was shot, he was on top of George Zimmerman, had him pinned down, was in complete control of the situation, and was wailing away, bashing Zimmerman’s head into the sidewalk like a madman, while Zimmerman screamed for help.

And it wasn’t even close. The jury believed Zimmerman’s entire scenario based upon the evidence provided: Trayvon assaulted him, mounted him, beat on him, and Zimmerman ended the assault with one gunshot. But the best argument the prosecution could have even hoped to prove, is that the whole encounter between George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin was a mutual clusterfook. Sybrina Fulton even confessed that this was her belief at one point during a fleeting moment of honesty and insight. She soon recanted this assertion when reminded by her attorneys that all the money they were going to get was based upon a conviction, and any conviction for anything was dependent upon her playing the victim and continuing to scream about racism.

Fulton was interviewed on NBC’s “Today” show the morning after George Zimmerman was charged with second-degree murder in the death of her son.

When asked what she would say if she could talk to Zimmerman face to face, Fulton said a person should apologize if they are remorseful. She then said she believed the shooting was an accident and things got out of control.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57413033-504083/travyon-martins-mother-sybrina-fulton-says-she-thinks-his-shooting-was-an-accident/

http://www.today.com/video/today/47027225#47027225

UPDATE, 1:20 p.m. ET: Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton, who said on the “Today” show early Thursday that she believed the killing of her son was an “accident,” has retracted those comments.

“George Zimmerman stalked my son and murdered him in cold blood,” told MSNBC in a separate interview.

EARLIER: Trayvon Martin’s mom, Sybrina Fulton, said in an interview on the “Today” show Thursday that she believes it was “an accident” that George Zimmerman shot and killed her son in Sanford, Fla., on Feb. 26.

“I believe it was an accident,” Fulton said. “I believe that it just got out of control, and he couldn’t turn the clock back. I would ask him, did he know that that was a minor, that that was a teenager and that he did not have a weapon? I would ask him that I understand that his family is hurting, but think about our family that lost our teenage son. I mean, it’s just very difficult to live with day in and day out. I’m sure his parents can pick up the phone and call him, but we can’t pick up the phone and call Trayvon anymore.”

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/trayvon-martin-mom-sybrina-fulton-zimmerman-shooting-accident-122512394.html

With all due respect to the mysterious juror B29, George Zimmerman download (38)got away with homicide, not murder. Because it was justifiable. But apparently, even though she couldn’t quite grasp the vastly different connotations of those two words, B29 was quite able to come to the understanding that even if she wanted to personally call it “murder,” there are times when “murder” is “justified.”

(Here we see a snapshot of ABC’s Robin Roberts physically putting those infamous words into B39’s mouth.)

http://www.democracynow.org/2013/7/26/juror_b29_says_zimmerman_got_away

The whole truth, is that legally, however the scuffle between Zimmerman and Martin started, at the point where Zimmerman was pinned to the ground being beaten with impunity and fearing for his life or serious bodily harm, he still had a self-defense case. It was homicide, there was never any question about that. But it was justifiable homicide.

Despite the race-baiting bluster of the Martin offensive, it was never in the cards that George Zimmerman was going to be portrayed in the courtroom as a murdering redneck–even though that’s the exclusive proposition the Martin camp pitched to the entire nation for over a year and still tries to. That’s the entire premise upon which the “Justice for Trayvon” movement was contrived. 99414891-trayvon-martinHowever, in practical, legal terms, it was far too obvious a lie that would only give them away in court. Outside of court however, that never did and still doesn’t matter to the worshippers of Saint Trayvon of Martin. Lie away. And just keep repeating it.

To compare Sybrina Fulton to Mamie Till, is to take a big dump right on Mamie Till’s legacy. To compare Trayvon Martin to Emmett Till, is to suggest that Emmett, like Trayvon, almost certainly had it coming. There is no legal similarity or moral equivalency between these two fatal incidents, the trials that followed, or the people involved in them. I’m tempted to suggest that those are the sorts of comparisons only terminally brainless people make: Uninspired, undiscerning idiots who don’t have the intellectual capacity or honesty to perceive things as they are, and are only capable of projecting what they feel emotionally about any given subject into their perception of the world so that what they want to be true becomes the truth. Emotion becomes their reality.

In the real world, Emmett Till was dragged out of his house, his eye gouged out, he was beaten about his face in till it was unrecognizable, he was tortured, shot, and dumped in a river by a group of actual dumbassed rednecks who killed Picture of Emmett Tillhim expressly for allegedly touching or flirting with a white woman. They came in, said “Give us that Chicago Nigger,” explained how they were going to teach him a lesson for his filthy behavior with their pure white flowers of southern womanhood, transported him to a secure location, battered him into a pulp and then shot him to death. Trayvon Martin in contrast, was shot cleanly once through the heart in order to get him to stop smacking the hell out of a defenseless neighborhood watchman he had pinned down in some sort of paranoid fit of macho bravado. The man who shot him was a fairly dark-skinned man from a multi-racial minority, a mentor of young black children, a service volunteer who lived in a diverse community, citadelyearbookwho dated black women, and a man who was decidedly brown, not “white.”

In the real world, The entire jury, the judge and court hearing the Emmett Till case was staffed from the start with KKK members. It was overseen by the avowed, racist white power structure that ran the whole south at the time. In spite of the evidence in Emmett’s case being so clearly against the accused, a jury of completely white, hillbilly racists nullified the obvious evidence and let Till’s admitted killers go free. Emmett’s murderers admitted right after exoneration that they had indeed done it, and boasted of all the details openly without any reprisals whatsoever. They lived peacefully on to become obscure old men. George Zimmerman’s court was conversely,kkk_lynching1 rigged entirely against him from the local mayor to the black president of the United States and his black Attorney General, who even in light of Zimmerman’s complete exoneration under an intensely slanted prosecution, continue to ponder tactics through which to perpetuate his persecution on a federal level, once again, pretending to be avenging some great racist travesty of justice. This in spite of the fact that Zimmerman had already been investigated by the FBI, the Sanford police department, and the Florida state attorney general. Not deterred by the facts, federal Attorney General Eric Holder put up a web site and a tip line hoping to drum up spies, white-lynching-partyfinks, stool pigeons, and back-stabbers, in the event that there was some old girlfriend or some guy he cut off in traffic once who still had a big enough stick up his backside over it that they’d come up with something good to use against George Zimmerman.

So far…nothing. Except for this:

Benjamin Todd Jealous, the head of the NAACP, launched a petition shortly after the verdict which read that “George Zimmerman stalked and then took the life of Trayvon Martin.” The petition has since received over one million signatures.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/21/legal-experts-dojs-zimmerman-tip-line-merely-gives-impression-that-agency-is-acting/#ixzz2cHIq7cU3

http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/21/legal-experts-dojs-zimmerman-tip-line-merely-gives-impression-that-agency-is-acting/

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/16/doj-sets-up-public-email-address-to-take-in-tips-as-it-aggressively-pursues-george-zimmerman-civil-rights-investigation/

Contrary to Emmett Till’s killers, George Zimmerman has been in hiding and protective custody for over a year and will likely have to remain permanently underground for fear of his life from the black hoards of threatening  Trayvonites.

All the Martinistas of today are capable of comprehending is that in Emmett Till and Trayvon Martin, they see two dead black youth. It’s utterly beyond their capability to reason or discern that these two youth in two entirely different eras, arrived in that condition via two entirely dissimilar paths, and at the moronhands of two utterly disparate agents of death. Their perspective is fundamentally racist, and they frankly, often aren’t bright enough to tell the difference between overt racist brutality and death through misadventure. Moreover, about 98% of them won’t have a clue what “misadventure,” “disparate” or “dissimilar” mean, won’t be able to extrapolate the meaning of the pun “Martinista,” and will be too lazy to look any of it up. They won’t even sound out “extrapolate” because it’s got too many syllables.

If Emmett Till’s grisly slaughter openly at the hands of boasted white racists, and the openly biased trial that set free his well known killers, became the spark that ignited the fire of the American Civil Rights Movement, then the excuse-making farce of a witch hunt that Sybrina Fulton and her race-baiting conspirators call “Justice for Trayvon,” may well be the bucket of dank, senseless, hysterical piss-water that extinguishes that flame.

http://www.biography.com/people/emmett-till-507515?page=3

http://www.emmetttillmurder.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till

Unlike the accomplished, educated, productive, model of a single mother, Mamie Till, Sybrina Fulton as we’ve come to know her, is a woman who barely even knew Trayvon Martin, her own son, and in early interviews couldn’t give any details at all about him. Comparing her charlatanism to the dedication and dignity of Mamie Till should be embarrassing to all the shameless fools who propose it. If Sybrina Fulton doesn’t want any more dead Trayvons, tell her to teach young black david_shankbone-via-Flickr-CC-BY-2men not to freak out and beat up night watch commanders in housing complexes where they don’t live and nobody knows them.

To compare Trayvon Martin the cocky, wannabe thug, to Emmett Till, or to equate Emmett’s hick, bigoted assassins to George Zimmerman, the multi-racial mentor of minority children, is stupidity and ignorance on a massive scale. It only feeds the stereotype that “niggas” will believe anything. It only confirms the popular “white” belief that when it comes down to it, black people are the most racist ethnic group in the world. (Next, arguably, to the images (91)Japanese.)

Sybrina Fulton and her team of lawyers is engaged in performance art. They’re re-enacting the Civil Rights Era for fun and profit. It’s street theatre and they’re all playing out their favorite roles from historical Civil Rights models.

Above all else, Tracy Martin isn’t Sybrina’s loving spouse, that’s just a cash-enhancing motif rolled into the script they’re performing by their handlers. Tracy’s been groomed up by the “suits”and is tugging along, drawn by the big chain attached to his ever-fattening wallet.  The reason Sybrina Fulton now always appears with Tracy Martin by her side is because she doesn’t actually know a damned thing about Trayvon Martin. I doubt if she even likes Tracy at all, but she relies on him to feed her anecdotes and data about Trayvon and needs the symbolism of his presence by her side to maintain the credibility of her performance.

http://www.politicalforum.com/current-events/314561-oscar-goes-sybrina-fulton-tracy-martin-mod-edit.html

It’s an act.

From the very beginning the descriptions of Trayvon Martin by his parents did not make sense. Listening to questions of Tracy and Sybrina, and their answers – their responses were often disconnected, contradictory and, well, just odd in their lack of depth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=71Ytt7zTB6A

On example is this early interview with Sybrina Fulton, Trayvon’s mother.   Note this is very early on before the media handler (Ryan Julison) took control of the scripting, [screening and pre-approving the questions to be asked] and made sure Tracy and Sybrina appeared together.

Another example was about 2 months later when Sybrina travelled todownload (30) London, England and was questioned again. Even months later, when asked the same or similar general questions, she just never seemed to be able to describe Trayvon.   Very odd.

Additionally odd was upon hearing of Trayvon’s death Sybrina never left North Dade (Fort Lauderdale) to travel to Sanford. She stayed home.   The first time she actually went to Sanford was to attend a press conference on March 8th.

Also, Sybrina was unable to describe Trayvon’s likes or dislikes. She gave conflicting information about his favorite foods, sports, and things he enjoyed. Sybrina said Trayvon loved basketball, but Trayvon told everyone in his social network he disliked basketball.

When asked about his favorite meal Sybrina said Trayvon liked Fried Chicken; the next time she said hamburgers, and yet another time she described something totally different.

Sybrina told investigators she did not know that Trayvon had a twitter account, and she did not know his name on Facebook.  Sybrina Fulton knew nothing about Trayvon’s U-Tube account, his following of Mixed Martial Art combat fighting,  or his home made movies from street fights to video’s of his cousin.

On the morning she found out he was shot, she sat in the parking lot of her work for a few minutes then drove home – and stayed there.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/12/17/brina-dearest-sybrina-fulton-and-tracy-martin-lie-to-cover-up-the-greatest-danger-to-black-boys-the-absence-of-two-parents/

Look at poor Bill Cosby. He’s a black media pioneer and legend. You could sum up Cosby’sbill-cosby whole pitch with a phrase he uses frequently: It’s not about color. It’s about behavior. And a large element of the “black community” calls that condescending. A large percentage of the “black community” argues essentially, or sometimes specifically, that “nigga-ness” is every bit as good as being intelligent, well-spoken, employable, well-mannered and properly groomed. Those things are “white” things. “Nigga” don’t need to act white.

http://madamenoire.com/281822/bill-cosby-and-the-cult-of-why-cant-black-people-be-more-like/

http://breakingbrown.com/2013/06/yvette-carnell-its-time-for-bill-cosby-to-stop-giving-black-folk-condescending-advice/

http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/12/bill-cosbys-tough-love-is-counter-productive/

http://rense.com/general82/ana.htm

http://newsone.com/2579546/bill-cosby-new-york-post/

Sybrina Martin and her cohorts are actually arguing in favor of young black males dressing and acting like thugs, and I suppose, assaulting white men at will. When they say, “We are all Trayvon Martin,” they mean, any one of us all thugged and doped-up in our cute, official thug-hoodies could flip out and start pasting “Whitey” in the face if he looks at us askew. It’s patronizing for Bill Cosby to expect us to dress well, speak clearly, and not dole out an 64391_cbb4f23fb852523fc43614680ea9cdd1_ec5fcec805c934110af2909d52ac163bobligatory ass whoopin’ on “Whitey” now and then. Since we obviously can’t control our behavior, they argue in essence, it’s not fair that sometimes “Whitey” has a gun. They think “Whitey” should take his beating and not make a big deal out of it. Most of the time “Whitey” isn’t going to get killed. Just “ass whooped.” They don’t think that their vicious, degenerated offspring should have to risk their lives to simply deliver a routine thumping on “Whitey.”

Rachel Jeantel, Trayvon’s girl “friend” made exactly that argument on Piers Morgan shortly after Zimmerman was acquitted.

http://radio.foxnews.com/2013/07/16/just-take-your-beating-white-boy/

http://www.mediaite.com/online/limbaugh-takes-on-rachel-jeantel-she-basically-admitted-trayvon-was-ass-whooping-zimmerman/

But it’s not usually “Whitey” with the gun these days. It’s Trayvon or one of his peers. The professional negroes in the Civil Rights industry who malcolm_x_by_esclamazione-d4dierxare so gleefully reveling in the tragedy that is the Trayvon Martin story, just want you to fixate upon the shiny thing they’re dangling in front of you. Hey, look at this giant racist hillbilly killer with a gun running around Florida’s “gated” white neighborhoods slaughtering helpless baby negroes just for “walking black!” They want you just to never mind all that “broken black family” nonsense. Don’t you listen to Bill Cosby when he tries to tell Trayvon Martin and his friends to pull their pants up, lose the hoodie, the drugs, the guns0 (1) and the bling, stop acting like thugs and learn to speak English. Don’t you dare bring that up you heartless bastard!  Tracy and Sybrina just lost their son!

Trayvon Martin’s not on trial!

No, but he should be. Had he lived, he would be. And  I think, his parents too.

I’m happy to engage in a serious and deep conversation with the “black community” about race and racism in America. But I’m not going to negotiate reality with the “black community.” And I’m not going to have much of a conversation with a “community” that invariably calls me a “racist” and threatens to kill me or do me serious bodily harm every time I write or say something that they disagree with. So I’ll let Charles Barkley say it for me:

BARKLEY: And let me say, Mr. Zimmerman was wrong to, he was racial profiling.

BARTIROMO: Absolutely.

BARKLEY: But I think Trayvon Martin, God rest his soul, I think he did flip the switch and start beating the hell out of Mr. Zimmerman. But it was just a bad situation. And like I said, the main thing I feel bad for, it gives every white person and black person who is racist a platform to vent their ignorance.

BARTIROMO: Right.

BARKLEY: You know, that’s the thing that bothered me the most because I watched this trial closely, and I watched all these people on television talking about it. A lot of these people have a hidden agenda. You know, they want to have their racist views, whether they are white or black.

BARTIROMO: The bias comes out.

BARKLEY: The bias, it definitely comes out. It was a bad situation. We all lost. And I feel bad for his parents. You don’t ever want to see anybody lose a kid.

http://deadspin.com/charles-barkley-sees-medias-hidden-agenda-in-george-831625620

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/blogs/open-mike/os-charles-barkley-george-zimmerman-trayvon-martin-20130723,0,569431.post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/20/geraldo-rivera-trayvon-martin-thug-wear_n_1530811.html

For instance, if getting to the bottom of why Tracy and Sybrina lost their son is really the point of this major legal, social, and political shouting match over who’s to blame for all theI-want-to-hear-more-about-Trayvon-Martin nation’s little dead Trayvons, one would think it pertinent to note that Trayvon’s dad is a career philanderer and apparent member of or hanger-on to the Crips. Though he’s covered his tats and no long makes “gangsta” hand signs in photographs, he lived a lifestyle in any case that destroyed Trayvon’s infancy and relationship with his biological mother, then destroyed Trayvon’s relationship with his step-mother, the only woman he grew up calling “mom,” and just before he began to have serious behavioral problems in and out of school, Trayvon was being tossed between his dad’s current shack-up lady-buddy and his somewhat estranged biological mother, who sent him back to Tracy because by then she couldn’t handle him.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/08/08/sybrina-fulton-her-son-jahvaris-and-some-unrelated-guy-named-fruit-represent-modern-african-americans-on-the-cover-of-ebony-magazine/

Trayvon-Martin-Thug1-600x350The “black community” isn’t interested in conceding Trayvon’s dabbling in the “thug life” at all, and Sybrina Fulton is particularly in denial on this count:

The Truth? You can’t handle the Truth!

One could never say with any assurance that Trayvon Martin’s multiply-broken home lifetraycandthecrips contributed to his turn toward playing the thug, or lashing out at George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watchman who was simply curious about what he was up to out in the dark and rain. But his departure into the world of “gangbanger” behavior was directly coincident to his being torn out of the home and out of the arms of the woman he called “mom.” His father, still married to the woman he had always called “mommy,” further sent him to live with his long-estranged biological mothertracymartincrips rather than take him along with to the Retreat at Twin Lakes to shack up with his new girlfriend who was still married to some other guy. And you have to wonder why Sybrina would surrender a three-year-old Trayvon to a philandering father and the woman he cheated on her with. Or how it came to be that Alicia would have surrendered Trayvon to anyone.

You also have to wonder, where’s Mr. Fulton in all this? Is he dead? Gone? What? A cypher? Where is he all the time Tracy is making photo ops with his wife?

The whole Fulton/Martin relationship and all it’s inter-connected links are pretty F’d up as they say. But that’s not rare at all in the “black community,” so maybe that’s why they don’t think it’s any big deal. That’s not obama-gangsterthe troubling story they want to tell.

Nobody’s perfect. There are no perfect parents. There’s no perfect family. But the Fulton and Martin Street Theater Workshop is doing its best to convince you they are all of the above. But then, they get paid to show you what you want to see.

http://patdollard.com/2013/06/trayvon-martins-father-scrutinized-over-suspicious-activity-with-gang-members/

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/08/08/sybrina-fulton-her-son-jahvaris-and-some-unrelated-guy-named-fruit-represent-modern-african-americans-on-the-cover-of-ebony-magazine/

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/was-trayvon-martins-father-a-gang-member/

Posted in That "Race" Thang, Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

"Nigga" Moments Can Be Fatal: A Frank Discussion About Race in America

During the Rodney King riots of 1992, Tracy Martin’s then young black peers burned down la riots 4their own neighborhoods, destroyed entire sectors of thriving new business districts that other “black leaders” had begged to come in and revitalize “black” city centers. In this case, “nigga” was pissed off at a group of LAPD who beat up a black man who’d made them chase his Hyundai through town at a hundred miles-per-hour until they ran him down. When the cops went to trial and were exonerated, “nigga” went crazy on “Whitey’s” ass. “No justice, no peace,” was the slogan. And of course, this was nothing new. This only repeated actions taken by their parents a generation earlier in the Watts riots.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/07/16/wanted-dead-or-alive-t-shirts-selling-at-la-riots-79769

http://www.laweekly.com/microsites/la-riots/

The problem with these sorts of riotous “black community” reactions to alleged racial offense, is that less and less is gained by it, less and less is proved by it, as these alleged racial offenses become increasingly more trivial. While Rodney King’s beating looked bad on tape, the cops were pretty scientific about it and the fact remains that his injuries were never life-threatening, never threatened permanent injury or maiming, and he recovered in a few days. Rodney King passed away last year in great health, a “black community” hero and icon of adoration. The niggas who pretended to be his friends and champions, wiped out whole sections of their own black neighborhoods and businesses, that wasted hundreds of millions of dollars, and have not been replaced or recovered to this day. Who would move back into those riot-blighted sectors anyway? “Nigga” still lives there and still threatens to repeat his fits of self-destruction at the slightest imagined provocation.1336010402210.cached

I’ll give Jackson and Sharpton and their dwindling, old-school-negro civil rights activists their due. In 1965, in the deep south, rioting because Whitey won’t let you use his public restrooms, two black friends just got beaten half to death for using the white-only drinking fountain, and the KKK just hung some brother by the courthouse clock tower for unspecified reasons, seems pretty much warranted. However, destroying your own shite in the riot still doesn’t make any sense to me. Beating up people who support your cause and who have moved into your community to provide vital products and services is asinine for any reason.  It’s inexplicable nigga behavior.

The concept of a “sympathy” riot, up north or in some other city having nothing whatsoever to do with the issue or social causes that sparked the pilot riot, is even more inexplicable. It starts to look like nigga riots mostly because cuz nigga likes ta riot.

I can’t argue with even the most overt white supremists when they point obvious stupidity like that out. You couldn’t can’t hand them any more convincing justification for their racism and belief in the inherent inferiority of the “Negro” than what I can tune into on dadfathe evening news coming live from the “black community” itself.  There isn’t any better anti-negro propaganda for the KKK or Aryan Nations than simply Googling “LA Riots” or “Trayvon Martin Payback” and just reading what comes up.

The one group of people who never even entered South Central LA in 1992 for instance, was the Los Angeles Police Department. They were conspicuously missing in action. And if we give “nigga” his due, the LAPD were the one group of people, the only group of people, who needed their asses kicked on behalf of Rodney King. So the LA cops stay clear and let nigga beat and burn and bash everyone else. Their friends, families, strangers, neighbors. Everyone but the LAPD. The LAPD wasn’t around. The LAPD was thinking like white folks. Like real folks. And nigga was thinkin’ like nigga. Not thinkin’ at all.

Another group of people who survived the King riots was the new Korean and Asian business community that had set up shop in the area. They also had guns, and used them in a highly organized manner to keep nigga from burning and pillaging them out.

You might be seeing a pattern by now.

As a young-ish white male, I wondered repeatedly in 1992, watching the South Central mayhem on CNN, why in hell’s name these self-proclaimed “gangsta” thugs who were picking on random, innocents like Reggie Denny and passing motorists, couldn’t just get in a car, or ride the bus down to the local precinct station and take on the LA Fuzz they were actually pretending to be pissed off about. Maybe because the LAPD had guns and Reggie Denny and the other innocently passing bystanders and motorists they beat all to hell didn’t.

Whole websites now exist dedicated to this phenomenon of the “black community” la riots 2destroying itself, or lashing out at totally unrelated parties, alienating even people and other ethnic communities that otherwise would be totally sympathetic and supportive of their goals and cause. While virtually all of these sites are admittedly racists to the core, this phenomenon has become known as a “Chimpout.” If you’ve ever visited the primate house at the zoo only to upset the caged monkeys and have them suddenly start shrieking, flying around the enclosure, flinging their own shite at you and each other, it’s a fairly accurate, if unflattering and almost inherently racist analogy.

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Chimpout

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Nigger

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHbvg5Rt1EA

http://www.examiner.com/article/twitter-riot-threats-escalating-but-is-it-about-george-zimmerman

http://fedupintolerant.com/wordpress/?p=2016

http://www.whiteunity.net/index.php/topics/race-riot/

http://www.teapartynation.com/forum/topics/this-is-for-trayvon

http://thebeerbarrel.net/threads/zimmerman-nigger-riots.22772/

http://www.whiteunity.net/index.php/topics/race-riot/

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=75941

blacks-beating-up-whitesBeyond the “Chimpout” there was another recent young black phenomenon known as “wilding,” where roving bands of niggas would jump out of the shadows or nooks and crannies of some public venue, often in broad daylight, whack the crap out of some unsuspecting Whitey in front of everyone, and run off giggling about it. This form of nigga entertainment grew in size and intensity until it more recently developed into the “flash mob,” probably to continue the sport indoors at large shopping malls during the cold northern winters.

http://article.wn.com/view/2014/02/11/sheriff_black_leaders_working_to_halt_state_fair_x2018wildin/

http://www.sullivan-county.com/racism/strong.htm

http://www.ironicsurrealism.com/2013/07/15/baltimore-this-is-for-trayvon-violent-black-flash-mob-pistol-whip-kick-stomp-hispanic-male/

http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/colin-flaherty/chicago-running-out-of-euphemisms/

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/011161.html

http://unamusementpark.com/2011/08/feral-blacks-on-racist-rampage-at-wisconsin-state-fair/

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/20110805/wisconsin-even-more-black-wilding/

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/20090911/ohio-more-black-wilding/

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/011161.html

http://www.newnation.org/NNN-Black-on-White.html

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/07/4-blacks-torture-kill-white-couple-video-2711560.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=So94zEnBaUo

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=111657

You can research black-on-white recreational rapes, murder, beatings and robberies for hours. There’s no shortage of material to browse through. Suffice it to say, Trayvonwhites-beat Martin’s fans on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media, promised, and to some extent delivered on their boasts that the looting and mayhem seen in all the historically violent, previous racially-motivated riots, would be revisited upon the nation if Zimmerman were let off. But it’s not like they weren’t assaulting white people and each other every day before, during, and after the verdict anyway. Those are Trayvon’s peers. Those are the people Trayvon’s parents and “black leaders” are encouraging and defending with their hysterical rhetoric about “justice.”  You can call it “harmless” if you want to. Tell that to Reginald Denny, who happened to get his truck stuck in traffic in the middle of it all in 1992.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Reginald_Denny

Tracy Martin didn’t actually have to be there, didn’t have to be kicking Reginald Denny in 1the head to be part of the Rodney King riot generation. The “gangstas” in the streets of South Central in 1992, the music they listened to, the culture they spawned, was the genesis of what Trayvon Martin’s peer group became. (Yo, MTV Raps!) You can bet that Trayvon grew up with his dad or his uncles and older cousins sitting around, watching those old videos on YouTube with a kickin’ hip-hop soundtrack added by some disgruntled nigga, layin’ down rhymes about THE MAN, smilin’ and grinnin’ out stuff like, yeah, that’ll show Whitey…

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=111657

According to Trayvon Martin’s friend Rachel Jeantel, all Reggy Denny got was a good ol’ neighborhood “ass whoopin’.” Denny, if he hadn’t been in the gun-repressive state ofBlacks-Beating-Whites California, could have defended himself just like George Zimmerman I suppose. But by all accounts he was something of a peace freak and hippy. The guys beating on him had guns however. Nobody was asking them for permits. But then, I suppose the Monique Davis “black community leader” crowd would still be crying about that. They’d be saying, as they say now about George Zimmerman, that Reggy Denny wasn’t killed. His wounds weren’t life-threatening 21391_267852636687600_283410117_nas it turned out. By the Sybrina Martin standard, if he’d shot any of his rioting attackers, he would have been a cold-blooded killer and should have to go to prison. Any time some white guy shoots a black guy, the white guy has to “pay” for it. That’s the rule.

The “black community” is unusually eager to believe some pretty strange things. During the riots of the 1992 in LA, and in most other black communities, black talk radio stations were filled with theories about why their brothers were always burning down their own neighborhoods in places like Watts and Compton. The most common excuse was, because “white people put a chemical in malt liquor that makes black men go crazy.”

That’s the “logic” that makes sense to Trayvon Martin fans. That’s what passes for insight and wisdom in the “black community.”Just like burning down your own homes or beating up some random truck driver makes sense because you’re angry at the LAPD.

watts-riots-47-anniversary

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxBRyygMmTs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yv3-EBiGw4o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOXcHEMiHr4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9loSB5zMaoQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SW1ZDIXiuS4

black-man-kkk-outfit-placard-1For what it’s worth, there’s still a black community myth going back decades that the “KKK owns Circle K grocery stores,” and anything you buy there funds the Klan. The truth about the KKK of course, is that it consists of about 300 inbred yokels married to their cousins in the backwoods of Appalachia who are lucky to manage one rally a year just for the photo-op, and can barely afford their own mobile homes, much less manage a national convenience market empire.

http://www.csmonitor.com/1999/1025/p2s1.html/(page)/2

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2012/03/ku_klux_klan_in_decline_why_did_the_kkk_lose_so_many_chapters_in_2010_.html

http://www.questia.com/library/1P2-32575760/the-disruptive-face-of-a-dwindling-kkk-saturday-s

The hysteria over Trayvon Martin isn’t the first time the “black community” got it entirely wrong en masse. Forty years ago there were massive riots in Newark New Jersey, over downloadrumors that police had arrested and killed a black cab driver. 23 people were killed, 700 were injured and acres of property were devastated by fire and riot. The fact that the rumors turned out to be entirely untrue didn’t matter to the “black community” then either.

http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/07/08/nyregion/20070708RIOT_SLIDESHOW_1.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/08/nyregion/08riots.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

When the white working class started migrating to the suburbs of Detroit in the 1950’s, the 6a00e54fdb30b98834019104691d4a970cblack population that moved into the city likewise devolved into riot and self destruction. There was no Jim Crow south to blame, just a lot of unhappy niggas who migrated there themselves to get out of the Jim Crow south and still weren’t happy. That resulted in some pretty spectacular riots, but the very first race riots in Detroit actually go back to 1943. Even before then, at the outbreak of World War II, there was an influx of workers, black, white, and mixed ethnicities emigrating to the city to work in the defense industry406049607_510d6f22c2. That led to Polish and black fighting in the streets and escalated to full scale riots over jobs and business territories. These however, seemed purposed and personal. They were designed to gain liberty, assert civil rights, and accomplish specific social and political gains for the black population, which was being overtly and very physically repressed by a white majority. It wasn’t feral youth doing the organizing, and it wasn’t rioting for the sheer hell of it or to show they were pissed off at Whitey. I’m not conceding that a riot is ever a good thing. I’m just saying sometimes riots are prompted by actual grievances, and sometimes they’re not.

https://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwart/clio/detroit_riot/DetroitNewsRiots1943.htm

http://bellwork-inprogress.blogspot.com/2013/07/watching-white-flight-cops-soldiers-and.html

And there are recent black riots in both the UK and Sweden, all claiming to be due to blatant, repressive white racism.

oprah-winfrey-wears-giant-afro-for-o-magazine-coverBut how’s that sort of overwhelming white “racism” doing these days? Oprah Winfrey, the most powerful woman in modern media, worth some 2.9 billion at last check, couldn’t get the attention of a sales clerk at a high-end fashion boutique in Switzerland the other day, (where she shelters her income from oppressive, white US taxes) and cried all over the US media about that for a week, calling that racism. Or as she described it, she just knows instinctively it must have been because of her race. Just like she says, as she takes her place at the dais or at the head of the table in an office or boardroom, often as the only black person there, that all those white folks around here are thinking she doesn’t deserve to be there. Black people can read your mind Whitey, and they know you’re just hatin’ ‘em 24-7.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2013/08/09/swiss-tourism-office-apologizes-to-oprah-for-racism/2634673/

Since she owns and runs the company in most of those situations, you’d have to admit it’s got to be some pretty subtle “racism.” And I guess if there are no black people around her it’s her own fault. Hire some. And for that matter, the entire nation of Switzerland apologizing to you because some clerk in a shop didn’t show you the handbag you wanted to see, is an extremely asinine example of “racism,” so if that’s the best you can come up with in all your years raking in “Whitey’s” dough, you need to look into psychiatric help for your paranoia.

(But then, she has also offered to go with “sexism” as an alternate explanation for her persecution.)

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/World_News_3/article_9907.shtml

http://www.matthewnewton.us/communication-breakdown/when-riots-and-freedom-are-used-to-sell-jeans/

But Oprah almost “outed” herself, when it became clear that her entire racial pondering spree in the public eye, was clearly motivated by her attempt to garner attention and sympathy for her role in the “coincidentally” just released motion picture in which she was featured, The Butler.  The film tells the story of a black butler who raises a family waiting on “The Man” and examines the attitudes of wife, family, and offspring relative to the benefits of this honest work in a “demeaning” position. Go figure. Money, money, money Oprah. Poor baby.

Over thirty years after the insanity of Compton and South Central, you’d think the national “black community” would have developed a bit of sophistication. A bit of discernment. Adownload (1) shred of skepticism or self-criticism. A sense of proportion. But clearly not. Not if Oprah Winfrey is any indication. And she’s one of the bright ones.

Today, in Chicago, we still have to suffer the likes of Monique Davis, one of the Windy City’s highest “black community” representatives, and she still manages to invent out of her backside alone notions that top most previous black community myths for sheer idiocy, by claiming that it’s not really black-on-black crime plaguing her home town, it’s not Trayvon-killing-Trayvon, or Trayvon killing somebody’s little sister in a drive-by. That’s not it at all. It’s really white cops going around, secretly killing all those 500 black young men every year.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/01/bill-orelly-goes-after-chicago-democrat-for-publicizing-suspicions-about-police-killing-black-children-during-tense-interview/

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2013/07/19/state-rep-maybe-the-police-are-killing-some-of-these-kids/

By the way homies, that chemical in malt liquor is called “alcohol.” It doesn’t make you go imagescrazy, it releases inhibitions and lets out your true nature without the filter of a brain to temper your thoughts or actions. If you riot, beat up helpless truck drivers, and burn down your own homes, shoot each other, and tend to slap around your “bitches and hoes” when you’re drunk, it’s probably just you being yourself. Statistically. Demographically speaking. Nothing personal. Nothing inherently racial about it.stides_cube

And yes, George Zimmerman did turn up at the scene of a truck rollover a week after his release from Sybrina Fulton’s bondage, and he did indeed help rescue the occupants trapped in the vehicle. Like I said, it’s a statistical probability for his personality type, social, political, and ethnic demographic. That’s just George being George. Statistically. Demographically speaking.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/22/george-zimmerman-rescued-man-from-truck-crash-last-week-police-say/

http://www.theroot.com/buzz/family-saved-george-zimmerman-cancels-press-conference

Historical disturbances in the racial fabric of America are often hard to pin down and rationalize. But Trayvon Martin’s case is right here and now, in the most information-based society in history, in the world. It would seem unlikely that anyone could not understand what it was all about. Yet, so many Americans, most of them black, choose to know nothing about the case and simply join into the riots and protests for cultural and ethnic reasons of fellowship.

From a national perspective, nobody could at first be expected to know that local law enforcement and the original district attorney’s office privately knew “Sybrina’s Folly” (as the whole “Justice for Trayvon” exercise should have been called) was little more than the  self-indulgence of a grieving mother. But the Martin rumor mill, disinformation and misinformation factory, exploited the ignorance of the national sentiment. They had the nation by the heart, its balls would eventually follow, and they didn’t need to trouble the nation’s brain with the matter at all.

The Sybrina Fulton attack plan was not an exercise in critical thinking. Their publicity download (3)machine spewed forth more than enough credible-seeming bullshite to make the whole “Justice for Trayvon” enterprise look reasonable. At first blush, of course their conspiracy theories sounded plausible given their southern locale and America’s overt history of racism. Even a race-baited and civil-rights-weary white America initially conceded that much. But in the cause-starved, eager-to-protest university campus centers full of eager, self-hating liberal young white kids were magnetically attracted to the young black community, the “Hood,” and the hip, hop, fresh def and happenin’ cause of Trayvon Martin. It was the “progressive” cause of all causes.

The religious fervor that formed around the myth of Trayvon Martin’s martyrdom, immediately characterized him as the archetypal pure innocent black victim of white supremacy. That market didn’t have to be sold. It was easy to believe. That market would believe it even if Sybrina Fulton broke down and confessed she’d made it all up with Rachel Jeantel just to get money and attention. So promoting Trayvon Martin to Black Sainthood was no trouble at all, especially in the context of the rapidly evolving Martin team’s flurryimages (9) of finger-pointing bullshite. This included the media’s edited 911recordings, anecdotal “witness” fabrications, speculations, completely ignorant, revisionist theorizing about Zimmerman’s “connections” that got him off the charges, “experts” who read his body language, a train of Martin-team pretended re-creations, hired voice “experts,” cascades of lying, social-media bigotry on all sides, and a modern ADD/ADHD-based news cycle that has cultivated a press and electronic media that eagerly lapped up the drama and heartbreak of the Martin narrative.

The legend of George Zimmerman as the world’s most heinous racist and killer, originated shortly after Trayvon’s death. It started forming from a couple of vague witnesses who jumped to conclusions without actually seeing anything, and not knowing for sure what they were actually hearing. The longest, clearest evidence of Trayvon Martin’s final encounter with George Zimmerman is a much-promoted 911 call in which somebody is calling for help, lasts only 40 seconds. Other audio witnesses also heard these cries outside their houses and contributed to the false narrative by claiming it was the voice of a “little boy.” Trayvon was also on the phone to Rachel Jeantel, a “friend” some four minutes before this allegedly damning 911 recording timestamps the still invisible struggle. A lot has been made of her testimony about this call, but the only verifiable thing about that call is the timestamp when it started and the timestamp when it ended.

While it’s certainly fair enough to assume there was a struggle taking place between Martin images (2)and Zimmerman during the recorded 911 call, we only have Jeantel’s word, and her often unintelligible recollection to vouch for the content of her own call. Many smartasses on the internet think she really nailed it, but never listen to the cross-examination and aren’t really as clever as they think they are. Just smart enough to be dangerous.

It’s easy developing these theories and crafting testimony to support them in the freedom and supportive environment of family, friends, and an eager prosecution team. The media was certainly willing to accept anything handed to it without question. In the courtroom however, Jeantel first claims she heard Trayvon say some guy was following him and then heard him yell to somebody to “get off.” She tried to say she heard some man, ostensibly Zimmerman gruffly asking Trayvon what he was doing there. Then she heard the phone bump. Or maybe it was wind noise, or Trayvon hanging up. In any case, she went on to conjure up a sketchy script in which she was certain she had heard Trayvon being assaulted by George Zimmerman, who she had decided was a sexual predator about to rape Trayvon, and then go home and rape his little brother. Combined with the 911 recording and the witnesses who had assumed a “little boy” was crying for help, this testimony was supposed to be absolute proof of Zimmerman’s guilt.

The Rachel Jeantel story is worth a whole dissertation in and of itself. She’s wrangled her story all around the block several times before trial and then embellished it on several talk shows after the verdict came out and jurors started saying she wasn’t credible. Apparently Tracey Martin didn’t think so either, and began to chuckle and hide his face in court when she began to voice her narrative of Trayvon and George’s alleged confrontation.

http://conservativeblackchick.com/blog/2013/07/03/zimmerman-trial-star-witness-rachel-jeantel-and-the-politics-of-soft-bigotry/

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/06/27/will-rachel-jeantels-testimony-determine-george-zimmerman-trial-day-4-fate

If you want to hang George Zimmerman anyway, this sort of “proof” is just fine and dandy. You just don’t bother to mention that the struggle Rachel Jeantel claimed started as George Zimmerman ran up and accosted little Trayvon while she talked to him on the phone, took place well over four minutes before what is actually known to be the timeimages (3) stamped moment of death for Trayvon from the live recording via 911 from far across the neighborhood in an entirely different location. The “little boy” alleged to be begging for help on the 911 recording, started doing his screaming over four minutes after Rachel Jeantel claimed that George Zimmerman had latched onto Trayvon Martin. Jeantel’s alleged start of the struggle was located a football field away from where Trayvon actually died. Far, far away from where we know the actual recorded struggle started and the on-site witnesses heard the cries for help first start.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/06/27/witness-8-rachel-jeantel-scheme-participation-dot-connection/

In order for Jeantel’s scenario to work, George Zimmerman would have had to accost Trayvon Martin about a minute or at least 30 seconds before anyone heard anything, and download (4)then continue to either drag and wrestle, or struggle and chase Trayvon down the sidewalk past the T Intersection, and continue to fight and man-handle the kid for another 40 seconds before deciding to shoot him just for the hell of it, seconds before Zimmerman knew the cops should be arriving because he’d called them himself, and after several neighbors had very openly come outside and told him to knock it off.

http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2013/07/16/juror-b37-rachel-jeantel-wasnt-a-good-witness/

But it’s not even that easy. The crime scene is only a few yards long between the first encounter of the two and the end of the fight where Trayvon bought the farm. If Jeantel’s phone call cuts off with Zimmerman’s “attack” at the T intersection where Zimmerman and all the evidence says it did, apart from the greeting and who threw the first punch,images (7) you have Zimmerman and Jeantel pretty much telling the same story to that point. The problem with Jeantel’s version, is that she claims repeatedly that Zimmerman followed Trayvon to his daddy’s doorstep, came up and attacked him there. That’s about 100 yards away and around a corner from where the actual incident took place.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/04/02/us/the-events-leading-to-the-shooting-of-trayvon-martin.html?_r=0

So let’s play Rachel Jeantel’s game. She says Trayvon Martin told her he was already at his father’s (adulterous lover’s) house already. She claims Zimmerman had followed him all the way to this  temporary home, came up and confronted him. She claims she heard all off this through the phone. But this isn’t possible, even conceivable given the timing and actual distance from the scene of Trayvon’s death. So, let’s imagine that Rachel wasn’t just making up a good story to help her dead friend. Let’s imagine that Trayvon Martin was lying to her over the phone. Obviously, she had no way of telling where he really was so that much would be easy. But then, why would he do that?

West asked why Trayvon Martin “decided to approach this man and say ‘why you following me,” when he could have “just run home.”

“He was already by his house,”Jeantel replied. “He told me.”

“Of course, you don’t know if he was telling you the truth or not,” West speculated.

“Why he need to lie about that, sir?” Jeantel asked, skeptically.

West paused for a few seconds, then offered, “Maybe if he decided to assault George Zimmerman, he didn’t want you to know about it.”

Jeantel, whose testimony has been characterized by blunt language and irritability with the defense attorney, told West “That’s real retarded, sir,” and added “You don’t know the person. You do not know him.”

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/witness-rachel-jeantel-rebukes-defense-attorney-theory-thats-real-retarded-sir/

Perhaps, as West suggested, Trayvon Martin didn’t want to just come out and tell her he’d doubled back, and was planning to confront Zimmerman on his own terms with the advantage of darkness and surprise. Even so, the prosecution’s best witness clearly claims that it was Trayvon Martin who approached Zimmerman and initiated an agitated verbal exchange. Not even Rachel claims it was George who came up to Trayvon and started the hostile interrogation. It was Trayvon Martin who turned and snapped at Zimmerman, demanding a justification for his presence, not the other way ‘round.

But, one thing’s for certain, if at any time before his death Trayvon Martin had actually made it all the way home as he allegedly told Jeantel, the only way to ever meet up with George Zimmerman at the fatal T intersection is to spin off his doorstep almost immediately, and very deliberately decide to book it back down three lengths of houses and around a corner at a very brisk pace to catch George at the T where Zimmerman had just exited his truck to see if Trayvon was still wandering around the area. It’s absolutelydownload (5) clear that Trayvon Martin never went home, never intended to, and never dropped off the snacks he was still carrying, allegedly intended for his little brother. It’s clear that at the moment on the police non-emergency tape where Zimmerman tells the cops he’d lost him, that he was “running,” what Trayvon was doing is rabbiting around corners and buildings in the dark to shake Zimmerman off his tail so he could come back under cover and surprise him.

In other testimony-and there’s hours of it–Jeantel claims Trayvon never saw Zimmerman get out of the truck and that later in the conversation he couldn’t see George any more. That’s probably true. Trayvon spent four minutes sneaking around somewhere in the dark before he got pissed off or curious enough to turn around around and came back to find George unexpectedly standing there on the sidewalk at the T. I don’t know why this is so hard to conclude. Rachel Jeantel’s testimony puts Trayvon Martin at his father’s (girlfriend’s) doorstep at the moment of Zimmerman’s alleged assault. That’s a timed, recorded moment. A fixed time that agrees with other timed 911 tapes. It’s only the alleged location that is utterly bogus.

Because either Rachel Jeantel or Trayvon Martin was lying and making up a scenario about the assault of George Zimmerman to make Martin look better. One or both of these were attempting to say Zimmerman had hunted Trayvon down to his doorstep. That implies malice, and tends to justify Martin’s beat-down of Zimmerman. Neither Trayvon nor Rachel however, had any foresight to suspect that Trayvon would get himself shot, which screwed up their overall story in the end.

Zimmerman lost Trayvon Martin for four minutes shortly after his initial contact. Nobody contests that. That’s plenty of time for Trayvon to get get his tall, athletic butt home. And if that’s the story Trayvon wanted to tell Rachel Jeantel over the phone, fine. But then,images (10) why wouldn’t Trayvon just go inside and stay? Or call the cops. And where was Trayvon’s dad and adulterous lover all this time? Why would Trayvon make it “home” to safety, and then inexplicably turn back at his front stoop and confront some stranger who presented no immediate danger and was following him at a distance? If George Zimmerman really did follow Trayvon Martin right to the door, as Rachel Jeantel’s testimony implies, how is it then, that Trayvon’s death struggle and ultimate demise, actually occurred at the exact time Rachel Jeantel’ phone records suggest, yet not on his front porch, but some 100 yards away and around a couple of corners on the other side of several housing units?

The answer to these questions is a simple one. The entire Rachel Jeantel-inspired George Zimmerman as a killer-stalker scenario is a fable. It’s the way Rachel Jeantel wishes it happened. It’s the way Sybrina Fulton Inc. hopes it happened. It’s the only scenario that makes brave little Trayvon a heroic figure. If it didn’t happen that way, if it happened the way the actual evidence suggests, then Trayvon Martin is just another jumped-up, hooded-up black punk who did himself in playing gangsta with the wrong hankie.

So what we have here, clearly, is that Trayvon lied to, or to put it politely, was just bullshitting his friend Rachel over the phone to justify a thumping he was planning to put 6358724_f260on George Zimmerman. Or, alternately, Rachel lied to everyone after the fact to make her friend Trayvon look more like a victim. Or both. What actually happened that fateful night however, is almost inescapable. Zimmerman spotted Trayvon looking suspicious. Trayvon Martin spotted his observer, and found it very annoying that some “Creepy ass cracker” was giving him the eye. So he dodged Zimmerman, skulked around in the dark a while, doubled-back and came up out of the shadows exactly as described by Jeantel through the phone, and confronted George: “Why you following me?!!”

Some say Rachel Jeantel got her friend Trayvon killed that night by planting the seed in him mind that George Zimmerman was a gay rapist and if he let him follow him back home he’d rape both Trayvon and his little brother. I wouldn’t lay too much blame on Jeantel, given Trayvon’s history of  street fighting and apparent eagerness to engage in thug-like behavior. But I would again pose the question: where the hell then was Tracey Martin all this time? Apparently not home.

Apparently Trayvon had left his little brother unattended for an hour, home alone, and gone off eventually to the store, however long that took him to reach. And from the store, it was another hour roughly before he met his end in the Zimmerman conflict. There was no rush to get back home to watch an important athletic contest on the television as the Martin faction frequently claims. No rush at all. Over an hour of milling around in the dark in the rain is not a “rush to get home.” That daddy didn’t even report him missing until late into the next morning suggests it was no big thing for Papa Martin simply not to see Trayvon all night anyway.

No, the truth is, his daddy was out, probably partying with the mutually-adulterous girlfriend, and Trayvon was wandering around, scouting the new neighborhood in the dark for some reason only known to himself, and in the process of talking crap with a friend on the phone, noticed George Zimmerman watching him, and eventually became concerneda-woman-holds-a-sign-calling-for-the-arrest-of-george-zimmerman-during-a-protest-in-los-angeles about being followed home by a homicidal, perverted, cracker, rapist. The chain of events from that point on are fairly well documented and witnessed.

Zimmerman obviously never got closer than the length of a football field to Trayvon’s house. It was completely behind several other buildings. Zimmerman would have had no idea where Martin lived, and clearly Martin never went home. So Zimmerman was never there. Nobody confronted anyone there. The Martin/Zimmerman wordplay and fatal scuffle never started there.

In order to make the Jeantel-Fulton-Martin story work, George Zimmerman would have to have accosted the fictional little baby Trayvon (whom you’ve seen from all the public photographs) at his front doorstep, grabbed him up and run the hundred yard dash with a struggling kid in his arms in ten or twenty seconds, set him down at the T intersection, and then laid on his back so baby Trayvon could climb on top and start beating his head against the sidewalk. This would have to have happened because, a few short moments after Rachel’s phone goes dead, the instant she and/or Trayvon claim that Zimmerman “hit” our little baby Trayvon Martin, 911 calls are recorded of the struggle, and witnesses observe Zimmerman getting the crap beaten out of himself by a very large not-baby Trayvon Martin, who had assumed a “pound and ground” MMA position pinning George almost helplessly on his back.

There’s not a hope in hell anything like that at all happened between the real George trayvonmartyrdomZimmerman and the real Trayvon Martin. Trayvon Martin wasn’t a little boy. Zimmerman could have never commanded control of him. Neither George or Trayvon could have ever been close to Martin’s place of temporary residence. Painting George as a hulking adult and Trayvon as a little kid doesn’t work either. Witnesses saw Trayvon on top of Zimmerman beating him all to hell. Trayvon was not struggling, not just fighting, but Trayvon was beating George Zimmerman’s ass.

The comical part of Rachel Jeantel’s testimony, inasmuch as so many Trayvon Martin fans think it so conclusively proves Trayvon’s innocence, is that even if Rachel Jeantel actually heard the correct version of the actual Martin/Zimmerman meet-up over the phone, you still have a pissed-off Trayvon Martin angrily confronting George Zimmerman over why he was following him. And at worst, you only have a George Zimmerman asking what Trayvon was doing around the place in response. You still haveimages (14) no idea who smacked who first, or who grabbed who or what the fight was even about from that testimony. And more importantly, letting the actual words exchanged pass for the sake of the argument, Rachel Jeantel’s testimony is entirely supportive of George Zimmerman’s contention that Martin came up out of nowhere and with a few words slugged him in the nose out of the blue.

“Trayvon got hit,” said Jeantel.

“You don’t know that, do you?” West shot back.

“No sir,” said Jeantel.

“You don’t know if Trayvon got hit, do you?” asked West.

“No sir,” said Jeantel.

“You don’t know that Trayvon didn’t, at that moment, take his fist and drive it into George Zimmerman’s face, do you?”

No sir,” said Jeantel. West also challenged Jeantel several times over whether Zimmerman approached Martin the night of the shooting, but she maintained her story.

“If he was going to confront the man he would have told me, ‘I am about to confront the man and see what he wants.’ He did not tell me that, sir. He just told me he tried to get home, sir. But the man was still following him, sir,” said Jeantel.

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/06/27/will-rachel-jeantels-testimony-determine-george-zimmerman-trial-day-4-fate

Rachel’s first problem with credibility comes with the several versions of her basic story, in which new details seem to be constantly appearing the more she tells it. She originally article-2364794-1AD4E417000005DC-337_634x469hadn’t told anyone Trayvon had called Zimmerman a “creepy ass cracker,” or that he’d observed, “this nigga’s still on me.” The dialogue in which she and Trayvon talked about Zimmerman’s obvious homosexual desires towards the youth came up in some interviews, and not others. Those and other fairly important details went and came back again between repeating it to several recorded groups of people.

Zimmerman’s defense team pointed out that she’d made some 9 other calls to Trayvon that night.  When questioned about them, she couldn’t remember a single word of any of those, or even where Trayvon was when they were talking. Oddly enough, she has very article-2120504-1258523D000005DC-944_296x403precise memories of every word spoken, even by Zimmerman, who wasn’t even near the phone, and where exactly Trayvon was at the time of the one call most helpful to making Trayvon Martin out to be a martyr. Nevertheless, through Rachel’s phone records, and using other time markers like the time stamp on the video and register tape, from the market where Trayvon bought his now famous snacks, it became apparent that Martin checked out of the store at 6:23PM. Zimmerman’s first call describing Trayvon roaming the night and looking “suspicious” came in at 7:09PM. That’s giving Trayvon Martin 46 minutes at that point simply to walk a few blocks home. But he wasn’t anywhere near home, in fact he was slinking around an entirely different area of the complex over 100 yards from his doorstep.

Trayvon 7-11

Whatever else he was doing that night, he hadn’t just run down to the corner quicky mart to buy candy and tea for his little brother. And he wasn’t skipping merrily home. What he seemed to be doing is rambling around George Zimmerman’s housing development in the dark, in the cold, in the rain for the better part of an hour. If we assume it took him 46 minutes to dawdle back from the store, we can easily assume he dawdled his way over to it, loitering around the complex the same way for another 46 minutes. He still had therachel-jeantel-drudge Skittles and tea (Actually it was berry drink) in his pocket, unopened, undelivered to baby brother. And you have to ask yourself, what would be the point of wandering around in the dark and the cold and the wet for even the known 46 minutes, even if you were talking to your girlfriend on and off?

The least nefarious explanation would be that he was “talkin’ nigga shit widdiz hoe” and wanted to keep it private. Otherwise most normal folk would have just gone home to their comfy room, cracked open the goodies and had that lengthy conversation in a civilized environment. No crime in that, but props to George Zimmerman, that’s gotta look like pretty odd behavior to a night watch volunteer.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/15/star-witness-rachel-jeantel-speaks-out-for-first-time-after-trial/

Rachel Jeantel claims however, that apart from the fact that she remembers every word of her last conversation with Trayvon, she thought so little of that last call that she hung up, continued doing her hair and getting ready to go out to socialize that night. Even though in her final tellings of her final version of the call, she now claims she was convinced Trayvon was probably cut off while under attack by a gay, killer-rapist, for some reason, she never followed up with that possibility after the abrupt ending of the call.

Which leaves us with the only other alternative: Did Trayvon at least in some sense, get what he had coming? Was the whole Zimmerman/Martin encounter just a case of nature weeding out the stupid?  Was George Zimmerman in the final analysis, just less stupid or perhaps, just better prepared for his own stupidity than Trayvon Martin?

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/george-zimmerman-lawyer-94610.html

While the nation’s first “black” president plays another round of golf, why is it so Obama Vacationdesperately necessary that all the plain dumb white folks and all the day-to-day simple brown, yellow, red, and slightly less-tanned Americans have to keep guilting-away their dwindling cash through donations, apologies, and pretending to tolerate violent, deadly, black-based and black-on-black based stupidity simply because it hurts Sybrina Fulton’s feelings?

Fact: a lot of crime and criminal behavior centers around idiotic black youth, and sillyObamaGolfAP (1) assed black males like Trayvon “NO_LIMIT_NIGGA” Martin. Is it really worth destroying race relations across all American ethnic strata to avoid hurting the feelings and pride of two politically and ideologically motivated Florida parents determined to turn their son’s tragic death into a Black-Power corporate empire? How does selling Rachel Jeantel’s farce of a storyline do anything at all to help other thick-headed black youth escape their own stupidity?  Is it just too much to have to accept the fact that some of these nappy-headed little black American angel boys are not so much the victims of a repressive white conspiracy, as they are the casualties of their own ignorant, sub-cultural idiocy?

http://dailycaller.com/2013/08/05/ted-nugent-trayvon-martin-got-justice-video/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/04/ted-nugent-trayvon-martin_n_3704747.html

You can’t pretend to have followed the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case at all and not know that the girl “friend” Trayvon was on the phone with just  before he got himself shot is Rachel Jeantel. Rachel appeared on Piers Morgan’s very accommodating, white-liberal-guilt-driven leftist cable talk show shortly after the “not guilty” verdict came down for George Zimmerman. She essentially admitted what nobody has even really contested: Trayvon Martin was indeed a gang-banging poser. Her only defense for130714-trayvon-cash2 Martin’s lifestyle choice, is that while he deliberately looked, acted, talked, wrote, published, bragged, boasted and gave every impression that he was a “thug,” she maintains that deep-down he was a very kind youth who wasn’t “really” a thug and only occasionally smoked dope. (Probably only just enough to make him slightly paranoid about creepy ass crackers stalking him…) The fact remains that Jeantel did neither the prosecution nor the memory of Trayvon Martin much good once she finally dragged her substantial ass out into daylight and had to sputter and grunt out a coherent narrative of some sort that people could at least try to follow in public. No doubt, until she showed up in court, it was Rachel Jeantel driving the whole narrative of Trayvon’s untimelyresize demise.

I’d say, consider the source, but by the time Rachel Jeantel materialized, the scenario was long fixed and non-negotiable.

Now, in the course of her Piers Morgan mutterings, Rachel Jeantel claims “they” changed it up some nine, ten, or so years back and now I can use the word “nigga” all I want. Not “nig-ger,” mind you but “nig-ga.” This new use of the word, she contends, means a “male,” any male, even if he’s Chinese. No negative or racial connotations with that at all she asserts. Just like “cracker.” That’s not racial at all either she maintains. Except it still only applies only to white guys, and specifically to cops or prison guards or security officers or other white rednecks who think they’re in charge. Nothing at all ethnically or racially demeaning about that at all any more. So she says.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dH5iEsO7Hls

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w44bH1ihLRg

I agree with Rachel to some extent about the evolution and usage of slang, but not entirely. “Nigga” is an easily identified concept connected to both current  and longstanding black 085355_181945_trayvonmartinfingers1402x293slang. It has indeed lost a lot of it’s hatred and racist overtones whoever is using it. However, she’s whitewashed (pun intended) her definition somewhat. To understand it’s full meaning, you have to in most contexts subconsciously connect the prefix “dumb” to almost every use of the word “nigga.” That’s the way the word is really, and almost universally understood in the “black” community, particularly when used by a white guy. This, perhaps, except, as Rachel points out, in the “New School.” So, Rachel, if that’s our future, then that’s who I’m going to address here.

Yo, nigga. Zup?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuYd9pA8LIY

Rachel Jeantel’s assertions notwithstanding, I’m not going to be excused however much faith I put in her claims of current “black” homey vernacular. Not a chance of that. Not even by the “New School” thug-gangbanger posers she calls her closest friends. The rulesdownload (7) of correctly using the word “nigga” in truth, don’t apply if you’re both white and you don’t agree with them. If you’re black, even though not technically a “nigga,” you can say what you want. It’s niggas talking ’bout niggas. If you’re white however, a different rule applies. In that case: They may be niggas, but they’s our niggas.

I defer to “Boondocks” for any further definitions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3m8eqwQ-Ds

I’m not saying this. I can’t. I’m white. Boondocks however, makes it clear that “niggas” often engage in a thought process that is entirely foreign to the average “cracker.” The “white” population will never understand how Barack Obama for instance, non-governs the way he non-governs and gets away with it in the “black” community, or how he can be loved by them in spite of massive poverty and unemployment rates in that community. Rush Limbaugh has coined the term, “The Limbaugh Theorem,” to explain this phenomenon, in which he proposes that Obama deliberately avoids ever being seen in a position of running anything, or leading anything. Instead he’s constantly selling the black, liberal masses on the proposition that he’s lobbying the Powers that Be, trying to fix these injustices and broken governmental systems that have so obviously failed his constituency.

Even the great Limbaugh misses the bit point. It’s simpler than that. Barack Obama never 0ran for the office of president of the United States of America. As far as he’s concerned he’s been elected the Head Nigga in Charge. The Head Nigga is only in charge of the other niggas. He’s never actually the Boss Man. The Boss Man works for the Master of the House. Head Nigga is therefore always twice removed from feeling any actual ownership of the plantation itself except insofar as it’s welfare, and that of the Boss Man and Master, kicks back around to benefit all the little niggas working on it. And of course, the Head Nigga.

The Boss Man, well, that’s Bush. That’s the Republicans. That’s the House. That’s them. That’s THE MAN. The Head Nigga doesn’t run the place. He lobbies THE MAN on behalf of his lower-caste niggas. Head Nigga is friend to all the little niggas. Head Nigga is not THE MAN. Ever. Head Nigga is not even capable of ever even becoming THE MAN. That’s the way a community organizer thinks. Get the niggas up-in-arms, take their issues to THE MAN, and extract some concessions from the Boss. That’s what EOE and civil rights lawyers and lobbyists do. That’s what lawyers do in general. That’s what the Obamas do, or did, for a living. They are civil rights, community activist lawyers. Barack Obama has achieved the status of Head Nigga in Charge of all America’s hard-workin’ field niggasobama_poppin_caps. When Clint Eastwood talked to an empty chair and an invisible president, that’s exactly how Obama himself sees it. That’s the Boss Man’s chair, that’s where Bush sat. That’s the guy I’m lobbying against. It’s not my chair.

The notion that all those little working-class niggas out there, black, white, brown, all multi-colored and multi-racial, are actually the owners of the American Plantation in this analogy totally escapes Barack Hussein Obama. So does the fact that in the old days when niggas got a little bonus it was because niggas worked their backsides off to impress Massuh. You might think the lack of any cotton-pickin’ goin’ on in the civil rights plantation today would be an obvious hole in their negotiating platform, but the truth is, they’ve convinced all the little white and brown and non-black niggas out, there, all we collective Americans, that we owe them retro-actively for all the cotton their great great great great grand pappy theoretically picked a hundred and fifty years ago or so. Some of us buy that I suppose, but mostly we just pay them off so they don’t riot. Barack Obama, like the Al Sharptons and the fossilizing race-industry hangers-on like Jesse Jackson only know how to get hold of money, how to get ahead, or wield power in Trayvon-Martin-Thugtheir lives and communities one way: you exploit the civil rights dodge the way it has worked since the Kennedy era. You hearken back to the days of an overtly, Jim Crow era system of black oppression by whites and pretend nothing’s changed. A black president only makes that a bit harder to illustrate. So you have to gin-up a little racial injustice and disharmony to keep the pot bubbling and the income trickling into the coffers. That’s the mentality that embraces Trayvon Martin’s political machine. Trayvon Martin isn’t a martyr and patron saint of lost black youth, so much as a  symbol of the continued employment of career lawyers and “community leaders” in the race business. He’s the little black kid hunted down by the evil white power structure in American’s institutional system of racism and killed for just being black they can all point to and say–see, nothin’s changed. Ka-ching, ka-ching. Just make that out to the Trayvon Martin Foundation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2v5KRcvFvhc

There is only one sure truth in the inter-play between Trayvon Martin from Martin’s perspective–from the perspective of any “at risk” young black male. From the perspective of the “black community.” Trayvon Martin had absolutely no control over what George Zimmerman was thinking that fateful night. Trayvon Martin had absolutely no control over what George Zimmerman was doing out there that night, good bad, armed, justified or not. But Trayvon Martin had absolute control over what Trayvon Martin was thinking and doing out there in the dark and the rain. And the truth is, George Zimmerman wasn’t “Whitey.” He wasn’t the fictional hillbilly racist invented by the Race-Baiting Industry. That entire theme vanished in the actual trial because there was no evidence for it at all.

Short of the sinister, baby-killing redneck monster created by the Sybrina Fulton Corporation, George Zimmerman’s race or racial biases had almost no opportunity to figure much into Trayvon’s death in any case. Zimmerman could have been Haitian or Zambian and had skin as black as a bowling ball. Trayvon wasn’t being “stalked.” Trayvon was being observed by the local night watch because he looked suspicious for whatever reason, call it “profiling” or not. But that didn’t get him killed.The Trayvon Martin shooting

Clan Martin and company desperately tried to sell the world on the notion that little baby Trayvon was snacking on candy on his front stoop and minding his own business when some huge, vicious white racist ran him down and shot him dead in cold blood. That was a lie. That was a lie they continued to tell with the help of a willing media, an overtly ignorant public sentiment (black and white) and a pandering, leftist political class. The Martin team sold this complete fabrication for a full year after it was known to be entirely baseless for fame and profit. This lie began at best as a mother’s hope and delusion to avoid having to face the simple fact that Trayvon Martin found out the hard way that Nigga Moments can be fatal. Martin may have only been “playing” the thug. But George Zimmerman had know way of knowing the difference between “playing” and “being” while he was getting his head beat into the sidewalk.

“Can I help you sir? Yes sir. No sir. I live right over there sir. No problem. You have a good evening…”

That’s the conversation that would have kept Trayvon Martin alive. You can say Trayvon doesn’t owe some “crazy-ass cracker” that courtesy because it’s none of his business what he’s doing out in the dark, skulking around the housing complex. Maybe not. But Trayvon Martin owes Trayvon Martin that conversation. I obviously can’t understand “black” culture entirely. But, this is the same advice I’ve frequently given my own large, Jordan-Davis-21dangerous-looking sons. That’s because, in the “White Community” we generally teach our children to avoid saying that one thing that will get them shot or beaten-down. In my experience however, in the “Black Community” be it with cops, bouncers, security details, community watch, or just heavily armed fellow homeys, the ethos or social standard seems to reward lipping off with just exactly the right thing to inflame violence. In my casual observations, one of the reasons more black guys get arrested than white guys on similar charges, is that the white guy knows what not to say to get thrown in jail for the night.

If you as a “black community” want to continue to argue the case that “Whitey” has no business asking questions or otherwise “profiling” large black teenaged males roaming the dark and rainy night, in a crime-plagued housing complex where they are clearly strangers, if you wish to continue to argue that “Whitey” has a beat-down coming for daring to be concerned about the character of big black youth dressed like thugs prowling around the darkness, then you will simply have to continue to make that argument weeping over a slab in the morgue.

Posted in That "Race" Thang, Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment